Russian propaganda is also well known. Due to behaviour of america you excuse similar behaviour of the russian empire.
Show us a concrete example of proven, indisputable disinformation by Russia leading to the sort of catastrophes the US regime has been provoking with its lies.
Thats my point. An ukranian born with russian roots (stalin population politics), with pro-russian ties and tendencies.
A “russian/zionist puppet”.
Ah using your style of “argumentation” sure is handy and gives a simple view on the world…
And yet, your supposedly complex view of the world fails to account for hard facts like these. If Ukraine's Deputy Prosecutor General lied about his team not having found any evidence for poisoning, surely some of them would have raised their voices in protest, wouldn't they? Or was the entire department staffed by native Russian-speakers?
By the way, alleged demographic policies of Stalin are one of the reasons why the same Ukrainians you appear to be favorably biased towards, are now forming a majority in Galicia. So you may thank Stalin.
Also, what Russian-zionist nexus are you alluding to? Because with regards to Ukraine, Moscow and Tel Aviv are at loggerheads.
Last but not least I never claimed non-Russian speakers in Ukraine are predestined to be NATO and zionist puppets. It's not my style of argumentation.
sure like mere “puppets” controlled by their american overlord?
Why resort to rhetoric questions? You can read the papers instead, seeing how the answers you're looking for are contained therein.
Please, there is a reason ukranians are fighting so strongly now. After all the history with russia they have.
Sure, Ukrainians are fighting like supermen... we can see that from the staggering amount of videos which surfaced showing demoralized Ukrainian troops complaining about inadequate equipment and displaying obvious unwillingness to join the front.
Although I'll concede that this mostly applies to the regular Ukrainian military, neo-Nazis and other far right extremists mobilized within regiments of their own not conforming to this rule, high as they are on captagon and morphine, ideologically conditioned as they are to engage in completely futile, statically entrenched, irrational and nihilistic resistance, perfectly echoing the Wehrmacht's attempted defence of Berlin in 1945.
This of course does nothing other than to cause additional damage to Ukraine's civilian infrastructure - which in fact they don't really care about, considering that it's affecting Russian-speaking areas for now.
This is just your pet peeve. Annihilating statehood and flattening cities like russia does is quite a bit worse.
Except that the purpose of those "color revolutions" was to set the stage for wholesale destabilization of Russia down the road, utilizing the anti-Russian stooges brought to power by NATO throughout Moscow's vicinity. In that sense, Russian intervention was provoked by a concrete and palpable threat of existential nature, and Russian intervention effectively averted destruction of potentially much greater scale.
Whereas recent military interventions and nefarious meddling by NATO (Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Afghanistan etc) were not triggered by any realistic menace to the security and territorial integrity of member states. None of the nations attacked, invaded, plundered, balkanized by western regimes and their allies represented a real formidable threat to the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia or New Zealand.
The actual motivation behind these military adventures was to prolong the brutally enforced dominance of the empire. Key differences you opt to ignore.
But no earthly power, no matter how mighty, is eternal. And clearly, the zio-American empire has entered its phase of decline, much to the relief of mankind.
And for how “stable” a dictatorship is. This is temporary.
Russia's political order isn't dictatorial, it's democratic - just not liberal democratic. In many ways their model of governance is superior to the western one, and rather than trying to disparage it through clichéd catch-phrases, western regimes would benefit from taking the Russian system as a source of inspiration.
Such as?
The more we go back the more we run into russian influence and meddling. On all their federations/warsaw pact minions.
This must be sort of an ironic remark. For last time I checked it was the US regime which, in breach of its promise to Gorbachev, kept expanding NATO across central and eastern Europe, with Russia essentially staying passive to these provocations. But that's over. NATO from now on will be reaping what it sowed.
A ceasefire is seldom violated for the first time by two opposing sides at the very same moment. One party initiates the breach, and in the case at hand it was the Kiev regime.
Russia also refused to cooperate regarding the downing of a civilian airplane. Russia prefers to lie and destabilize the eu with internet campaigns/spying/paying nationalist parties
I wasn't aware that spying onto itself qualifies as destabilization. As for the alleged financing of political parties by Moscow, I addressed this contention in a previous reply: not only have EU regimes only themselves to blame if they aren't satisfied with their own national legislation in this area, but what is more, if these allegations are true then Moscow would only be paying back the EU regimes for their systematic interference in Russia's domestic affairs via support for Russian opposition figures and parties.
We do not see much difference in the russian MO. No suprise seeing how putin is a former kgb agent.
You may want to a have a closer look then.
Like now with ukraine…..
Chechnia is just an example on russia’s heavy hand to keep its “federations” in line.
There is a reason so many eastblock countries came running to nato.
Why sweden and finland come running to nato now.
If you truly believe Russia's conduct of military operations in Ukraine is heavy handed compared to standard NATO procedure, where everything is basically flattened first and questions asked later, you'll be pretty disconnected from ground reality.
Your whole stick is basically absolving russia based on american misconduct.
Handpicking what “claims” to use or not
I mention and describe the characteristics of US misconduct to highlight how far removed Russian policy is from that sort of misconduct, and that there are many decisive differences setting apart the behaviour of these two governments on the international stage.