No but there are always good Taliban and bad Taliban, good Nazis and bad Nazis.
Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments
- Thread starter T-SaGe
- Start date
- Status
Guess what, the Russians are surrounded by Ukrainian Nazis. Why do you think they having a hard time taking control of the major cities?
Theres really nothing that the Russians already have. MiGs, Russian made helos, artillery, tanks, etc.
The SC
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2012
- Messages
- 32,233
- Reaction score
- 21
- Country
- Location
They can't wait till they loose the conventional war against NATO.. too many Russian officials have stated that it will be a first option .. not the last.. it can be a deterrent talk, or even bluff.. but it is consistent throughout the Russian leadership and high ranking officials,, it seems that Russia is just fed up with NATO..
Last edited:
Foinikas
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2021
- Messages
- 12,710
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Ooooh here comes the Zionist American fanboy Muslim who knows everything.
The Russian trolls are practically speechless on this. Lol
LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS - WW2 saying" ...
Wood
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
- Messages
- 4,839
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
Today I saw an interview of an active Ukrainian pilot. He said that they are able to fight against Russians even in encounters where the numbers are not in their favor by using tactics that they have learned from American partners. He also said that Ukrainian military has been preparing for the war for the last 8 years. They were not exactly caught off guard.
So I think America has been working with Ukranians for some time now.
Clutch
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2008
- Messages
- 17,023
- Reaction score
- -3
What is a good Nazi?
Had they really taken the possible invasion seriously, then the Ukrainians would have been in more advantageous position then they are already in. All the personnel would have been in fortified positions and the cities more fortified, I mean you see for example Odessa having to be fortified weeks after the invasion instead of being out of position when the president called for mobilization. More chokepoints and ambushes as the military columns try to push in. Less cities fallen. I mean the Ukrainian President himself was pretty much shocked that Russia was willing to invade its neighbor.
The Azovs
jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
NATO is not Physically intervening (actually they kind of did by providing military aide to Ukraine) is because they don't want to give Putin any excuse to diversify this war. This war, is still small compare to the scale of other war (Russia uses only 1/7 or 1/9 of national strength), which is for them and Ukraine being manageable. Any intensify of this war will be unpredictable, it could range from an all out conventional war (Which will devastate Ukraine and the Baltics), to WW3, to thermonuclear war.If russian forces are so weak and losing and losing then its great opportunity for nato to intervene as ukraine alone according to their vigorous claim are beating hell out of russians. But nato is not intervening does it mean nato and ukraine is lying about russian losses ?
See most of russian weapons are useless according to ukraine and west then what is stopping them ?
Russia has no guts if nato enters ukraine and will use nuclear bombs in ukraine cause nuclear missiles are last resort or maybe not. But then again if russia uses nukes means they admit conventionally they are really weak
On the other hand, NATO already say there are no base line for nuclear attack, launching a nuke , regardless how small is the yield in Ukraine, will most likely trigger NATO response, which again, would either mean WW3 or nuclear exchange.
Both side are crazy,, but not that crazy to wanted the world to end..
Name me another one?
There were like 5 or 6 Neo Nazi group in Ukraine, and Azov wasn't even in the top 3.
John Mearsheimer on why the West is principally responsible for the #Ukrainian crisis
economist.com
John Mearsheimer on why the West is principally responsible for the Ukrainian crisis
The political scientist believes the reckless expansion of NATO provoked Russia
It is so clear to me.
John Mearsheimer spelt it out so well.
I cannot understand the fervor of some here that championed the Nazis in Ukraine and the USA and NATO hell bent
on trying to destroy the peace of the world for their own misguided self interest.
What John Mearsheimer said is fact and on the dot (note: he was also in the US Armed Forces and West Point Graduate I would give him more credence than some others on this forum trying to project another angle). The media is doing a legit half *** job not giving a broader picture of the causes that led to this conflict. But I’m not surprised majority of common western folks are born idiots just look at one of the comments in the comment section of that twitter post after being presented with proofs he comes out saying, Putin had no reason, non sense.
@Meengla
I remember watching a movie "War Games" Nuclear war is like tic-tac-toe - No winners so west don't want to get involved in something they cannot win.
Well that their problem if they decide to attack NATO. You don't want to give them a reason to do so. If they bomb a supply point where they are helping Ukraine in Poland, expect a response like bombing Russian vehicles and supply columns as well as Russian bases or outposts in Ukraine. Trust me, it won't be pretty for the Russians. And if they use tactical nukes to deter NATO from keep on supplying, then U.S. will respond as well with tactical nukes. They develop the new tactical nukes for just this reason.
Yes the ship fire was just an accident. no missile involved. No US involvement. just an accidental fire on 3 ships. at the same time.
Wotanjugend is another but then whats the point so long they serve western interest and are good nazis
- Status
Similar threads
