Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[sidkhan2]

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyhas issued a strong warning to Russia following the recent launch of long-range, U.S.-made ATACMS missiles targeting Russian territory. In his statement, Zelensky emphasized Ukraine's enhanced military capabilities, declaring, "We now have the long-range 'Neptune' missile, and not just one. And now we have ATACMS. And we will use all of this."

Key Developments​

• First Use of ATACMS: The Ukrainian military recently launched six ATACMS missiles into the Bryansk region of Russia, marking the inaugural deployment of these advanced U.S. missiles in the ongoing conflict. This action follows a decision by the Biden administration to lift restrictions on Ukraine's use of long-range weaponry against Russian targets, which had been a point of contention for Ukrainian officials seeking greater operational flexibility.
• Missile Interceptions: According to reports from the Russian Defense Ministry, five of the six missiles were intercepted by Russian air defense systems, while debris from one missile caused minor damage and ignited a small fire at a military facility. Fortunately, there were no reported injuries from this incident.
• Zelensky's Statement: During a presentation in the Verkhovna Rada, Zelensky highlighted the significance of Ukraine's missile capabilities and reiterated that they would be utilized effectively against Russian forces. He noted that both the Neptune and ATACMS missiles are crucial components of Ukraine's strategy to counter Russian aggression.

Broader Implications​

• Escalation of Tensions: The use of ATACMS marks a significant escalation in the conflict, with potential repercussions for U.S.-Russia relations. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov warned that such actions could lead to a "new spiral of tensions" between Russia and the United States.
• Nuclear Doctrine Update: In response to these developments, President Putin has revised Russia's nuclear doctrine to broaden its options for nuclear responses. The updated doctrine states that any conventional attack supported by a nuclear power could be interpreted as a coordinated assault on Russia, justifying a nuclear response.
• International Reactions: The international community is closely monitoring these developments as they could reshape military strategies and alliances in the region. The involvement of advanced weaponry raises concerns about further escalation and the potential for broader conflict.

Conclusion​

Zelensky's announcement regarding Ukraine's missile capabilities underscores a pivotal moment in the ongoing conflict with Russia. As Ukraine prepares to leverage its newly acquired long-range weapons, the implications for regional security and international relations remain significant. Both sides are poised for potential escalations as they navigate this complex and evolving situation.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1858924529747382365

 

[HamzaWaseem]

Former top UN war crimes prosecutor Dr. Francis Boyle has revealed a bill of impeachment against President Joe Biden, aimed at preventing a potential escalation to World War III. Boyle's actions are rooted in his concerns over Biden's military decisions and the implications they hold for global peace.

Key Points​

• Impeachment Bill: Dr. Boyle has articulated that the impeachment bill is a response to what he perceives as Biden's reckless military strategies, particularly regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the use of U.S. military support in this context.
• Concerns Over Military Actions: Boyle has been vocal about his apprehensions regarding Biden's authorization of long-range missile strikes against Russian territory, which he argues could provoke a catastrophic escalation in hostilities. He highlights the risks associated with escalating tensions between nuclear powers.
• Background on Dr. Francis Boyle: A professor of international law at the University of Illinois, Boyle has a long history of involvement in human rights advocacy and international law. He has previously called for the impeachment of other U.S. presidents based on their military actions, emphasizing adherence to constitutional principles and international law.
• Historical Context: Boyle's call for impeachment is not unprecedented; he has previously advocated for similar actions against former presidents for military interventions that he deemed unconstitutional or illegal. His stance reflects a consistent critique of U.S. foreign policy and military engagement.

Broader Implications​

• Political Landscape: The introduction of an impeachment bill by Boyle may resonate with certain factions within the political landscape that are critical of Biden's foreign policy decisions. It underscores ongoing divisions regarding U.S. involvement in international conflicts.
• Public Discourse: This development adds to the discourse surrounding U.S. military actions and their consequences, particularly as concerns about nuclear escalation grow amid heightened tensions with Russia.
• Call for Accountability: Boyle's actions highlight a demand for accountability among U.S. leaders regarding decisions that could lead to significant global conflict, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of military engagements.

Conclusion​

Dr. Francis Boyle's revelation of an impeachment bill against President Biden reflects deep concerns about the direction of U.S. foreign policy and its potential ramifications for global security. As tensions continue to rise, this situation emphasizes the importance of dialogue and accountability in addressing military actions that could lead to broader conflicts.

https://www.infowars.com/posts/brea...achment-against-biden-in-order-to-prevent-ww3

x.com

x.com

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Russia has begun mass production of nuclear bomb shelters as part of its preparations for potential nuclear conflict. This initiative comes amid escalating tensions with the West, particularly following the U.S. decision to allow Ukraine to use long-range missiles against Russian targets.

Key Developments​

• Mass Production of Shelters: The Russian Emergency Ministry has announced the construction of KUB-M shelters, designed to provide protection against nuclear threats and other emergencies. These mobile bomb shelters can accommodate over 50 people and are engineered to withstand radiation and other hazardous conditions.
• Context of Increased Tensions: This move follows President Biden's authorization for Ukraine to utilize U.S.-made ATACMS missiles, which recently resulted in strikes inside Russian territory. The use of these long-range missiles has heightened fears of escalation, prompting Russia to bolster its civil defense measures.
• Nuclear Doctrine Update: Concurrently, President Vladimir Putin has revised Russia's nuclear policy, lowering the threshold for using nuclear weapons. The updated doctrine stipulates that any conventional attack on Russia, especially one supported by a nuclear power, could trigger a nuclear response. This change reflects Russia's strategy to deter perceived threats from Western nations.

Implications​

• Increased Civil Defense Measures: The production of bomb shelters indicates a significant shift in Russia's approach to civil defense amid fears of a potential nuclear confrontation. It suggests that the government is preparing its citizens for worst-case scenarios, which may include military

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Ukrainian forces have conducted their first strike inside Russian territory using American-supplied ATACMS missiles, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict. This development follows President Joe Biden'srecent authorization allowing Ukraine to utilize these long-range missiles against Russian targets, a decision that has drawn sharp reactions from Moscow.

Key Details​

• First Strike Inside Russia: The Ukrainian military successfully launched an ATACMS missile strike in a border region within Russia, targeting military assets. This operation is seen as a response to the increasing threats posed by Russian forces, particularly with the deployment of North Korean troops to support Russia's military efforts.
• Biden's Authorization: Biden's decision to permit Ukraine to use ATACMS missiles represents a major shift in U.S. policy, aimed at bolstering Ukraine's ability to defend itself and counter Russian aggression. This authorization allows for strikes deeper into Russian territory, which had previously been restricted.
• Military Implications: The ATACMS missiles, which have a range of approximately 300 kilometers, are capable of targeting critical military infrastructure, logistics hubs, and troop concentrations. Analysts suggest that this capability could significantly enhance Ukraine's operational effectiveness against Russian forces.

Reactions​

• Russian Response: Moscow has condemned the U.S. decision, warning that it could escalate the conflict further and potentially lead to broader military confrontations. Russian lawmakers have characterized the move as unacceptable, with some suggesting it could provoke a third world war.
• Ukrainian Perspective: Ukrainian officials and military personnel have expressed relief and gratitude for the support provided by the U.S., emphasizing that these capabilities are crucial for countering Russian advances and protecting Ukrainian sovereignty.

Broader Context​

• Ongoing Conflict: The use of ATACMS comes amid a backdrop of intensified fighting in Ukraine, with Russia launching extensive missile attacks on Ukrainian cities. The situation remains fluid, with both sides preparing for potential escalations as winter approaches.
• International Dynamics: The decision by Biden also reflects broader geopolitical considerations, including the need to deter further aggression from Russia and its allies. The involvement of North Korean troops alongside Russian forces adds another layer of complexity to the conflict.

Conclusion​

The first use of ATACMS missiles by Ukraine inside Russia marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing war, potentially altering the dynamics of the conflict. As both sides brace for further confrontations, the international community will be closely watching how this escalation impacts regional stability and security.

View attachment 1034428

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has publicly stated that Italy does not support U.S. President Joe Biden'srecent decision to authorize Ukraine to strike military targets inside Russia with long-range missiles. This stance reflects Italy's commitment to a more restrained approach regarding the use of military aid supplied to Ukraine.

Key Points​

• Italy's Position: Meloni emphasized that Italy's military support for Ukraine is focused on defensive measures and that Italian-supplied weapons should only be used within Ukrainian territory. This aligns with comments made by Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani, who reiterated that Italy's position has not changed regarding the limitations on the use of its military supplies.
• Differing Approach from the U.S.: While the U.S. has allowed Ukraine to utilize long-range missiles for strikes deep into Russian territory, Meloni has articulated a different approach, prioritizing air defense and avoiding actions that could escalate the conflict further. She acknowledged the U.S.'s response to Russian aggression but maintained that Italy would adhere to its policy of using weapons strictly for defense within Ukraine.
• Concerns Over Escalation: Meloni's comments reflect broader concerns about the potential for escalation in the conflict if Ukraine were to strike Russian territory with Western-supplied weapons. There is apprehension that such actions could provoke a stronger military response from Russia, complicating the already tense situation.

Broader Implications​

• Impact on NATO Unity: Italy's position may create rifts within NATO, as member countries navigate their responses to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. While many allies support robust military assistance, differing views on the use of such aid can lead to tensions in collective strategy.
• Political Reactions in Italy: The decision not to support Biden's authorization may resonate with certain factions within Italian politics, particularly those advocating for a more cautious approach to military involvement and emphasizing diplomatic solutions.

Conclusion​

Prime Minister Meloni's rejection of Biden's decision underscores Italy's distinct stance on military support for Ukraine. As NATO allies grapple with how best to respond to Russian aggression while maintaining unity, Italy’s cautious approach highlights the complexities of international relations in the context of ongoing conflict.

 

[HaiderAfan]

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has publicly stated that Italy does not support U.S. President Joe Biden'srecent decision to authorize Ukraine to strike military targets inside Russia with long-range missiles. This stance reflects Italy's commitment to a more restrained approach regarding the use of military aid supplied to Ukraine.

Key Points​

• Italy's Position: Meloni emphasized that Italy's military support for Ukraine is focused on defensive measures and that Italian-supplied weapons should only be used within Ukrainian territory. This aligns with comments made by Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani, who reiterated that Italy's position has not changed regarding the limitations on the use of its military supplies.
• Differing Approach from the U.S.: While the U.S. has allowed Ukraine to utilize long-range missiles for strikes deep into Russian territory, Meloni has articulated a different approach, prioritizing air defense and avoiding actions that could escalate the conflict further. She acknowledged the U.S.'s response to Russian aggression but maintained that Italy would adhere to its policy of using weapons strictly for defense within Ukraine.
• Concerns Over Escalation: Meloni's comments reflect broader concerns about the potential for escalation in the conflict if Ukraine were to strike Russian territory with Western-supplied weapons. There is apprehension that such actions could provoke a stronger military response from Russia, complicating the already tense situation.

Broader Implications​

• Impact on NATO Unity: Italy's position may create rifts within NATO, as member countries navigate their responses to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. While many allies support robust military assistance, differing views on the use of such aid can lead to tensions in collective strategy.
• Political Reactions in Italy: The decision not to support Biden's authorization may resonate with certain factions within Italian politics, particularly those advocating for a more cautious approach to military involvement and emphasizing diplomatic solutions.

Conclusion​

Prime Minister Meloni's rejection of Biden's decision underscores Italy's distinct stance on military support for Ukraine. As NATO allies grapple with how best to respond to Russian aggression while maintaining unity, Italy’s cautious approach highlights the complexities of international relations in the context of ongoing conflict.

View attachment 1034497

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Melonihas emphasized the need for the European Union to intensify its efforts toward achieving a ceasefire in Ukraine. This statement comes in the context of ongoing discussions about the conflict and the role of various international actors in facilitating peace.

Key Points​

• Call for EU Action: Meloni expressed that the EU should take a more proactive stance in mediating a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia. She highlighted the importance of diplomatic efforts to bring about a resolution to the conflict, which has resulted in significant humanitarian and geopolitical challenges.
• Support for Ukraine: While advocating for a ceasefire, Meloni reaffirmed Italy's commitment to supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression. She reiterated that Italy's military assistance is aimed at helping Ukraine defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
• Complexity of Peace Negotiations: The Prime Minister acknowledged that achieving a ceasefire is complicated by the ongoing hostilities and differing positions among key stakeholders. She stressed that any negotiations must respect Ukraine's sovereignty and not lead to any form of capitulation.
• International Collaboration: Meloni's remarks align with broader discussions among European leaders about the necessity of united efforts to support Ukraine while also seeking pathways to peace. This includes engaging with other global powers that could influence the situation, such as China and India.

Broader Implications​

• EU's Role in Conflict Resolution: Meloni's call for stronger EU involvement underscores the bloc's potential role as a mediator in international conflicts. It reflects an understanding that diplomatic solutions are essential alongside military support.
• Political Dynamics within Italy: The emphasis on pursuing a ceasefire may resonate differently across political factions within Italy, where opinions on military support for Ukraine vary. Balancing support for Ukraine with calls for peace could shape domestic political discourse.

Conclusion​

Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's advocacy for increased EU efforts toward a ceasefire in Ukraine highlights the complexities of navigating international diplomacy amid ongoing conflict. As Italy continues to support Ukraine, the call for peace negotiations reflects a recognition of the urgent need to address humanitarian crises while ensuring that any resolution respects Ukraine's sovereignty.

 

[HaiderAfan]

Russia has begun mass production of nuclear bomb shelters as part of its preparations for potential nuclear conflict. This initiative comes amid escalating tensions with the West, particularly following the U.S. decision to allow Ukraine to use long-range missiles against Russian targets.

Key Developments​

• Mass Production of Shelters: The Russian Emergency Ministry has announced the construction of KUB-M shelters, designed to provide protection against nuclear threats and other emergencies. These mobile bomb shelters can accommodate over 50 people and are engineered to withstand radiation and other hazardous conditions.
• Context of Increased Tensions: This move follows President Biden's authorization for Ukraine to utilize U.S.-made ATACMS missiles, which recently resulted in strikes inside Russian territory. The use of these long-range missiles has heightened fears of escalation, prompting Russia to bolster its civil defense measures.
• Nuclear Doctrine Update: Concurrently, President Vladimir Putin has revised Russia's nuclear policy, lowering the threshold for using nuclear weapons. The updated doctrine stipulates that any conventional attack on Russia, especially one supported by a nuclear power, could trigger a nuclear response. This change reflects Russia's strategy to deter perceived threats from Western nations.

Implications​

• Increased Civil Defense Measures: The production of bomb shelters indicates a significant shift in Russia's approach to civil defense amid fears of a potential nuclear confrontation. It suggests that the government is preparing its citizens for worst-case scenarios, which may include military

War coming!! Russia is expanding its building of nuclear-resistant bomb shelters amid ramped-up threats of WW3.
Russia has conducted nationwide drills and training for its population in nuclear preparedness!
The US DHS has done nothing to prepare the US population for war! Literally nothing…

 

[Akbar26]

Recent reports from Ukrainian intelligence indicate that Russian forces may be preparing to launch the RS-26 Rubezh missile from the Kapustin Yar launch site in Astrakhan, potentially targeting Kiev. Here are the key details regarding the RS-26 and its implications:

Key Features of the RS-26 Rubezh​

1. Range and Capabilities:
   • The RS-26 Rubezh has a range of up to 6,000 kilometers, making it capable of striking targets deep within Europe, including major cities like Kiev.
   • It employs a solid-fuel propulsion system, which enhances mobility and reduces launch preparation time.
2. Accuracy:
   • The missile boasts an accuracy of approximately 150 meters, allowing for precise targeting of military installations and strategic sites.
3. Warhead Specifications:
   • The RS-26 can carry a warhead weighing around 1.2 tons, which can be equipped with a nuclear payload or conventional explosives, depending on the mission requirements.
4. Deployment and Mobility:
   • As a road-mobile missile system, the RS-26 can be launched from various locations, making it harder to detect and target before launch. This mobility contributes to its survivability against preemptive strikes.

Strategic Implications​

• Increased Tensions: The potential launch of the RS-26 towards Kiev signifies an escalation in hostilities between Russia and Ukraine, particularly as both nations continue to engage in military operations amid ongoing conflict.
• Deterrence and Response: The capability to strike major urban centers with high precision raises concerns for Ukrainian defense strategies. It may prompt Ukraine to enhance its air defense systems or seek additional support from Western allies.
• Geopolitical Context: The use of advanced missile systems like the RS-26 highlights Russia's ongoing commitment to maintaining a robust strategic arsenal capable of projecting power across Europe. This development could influence NATO's response strategies and defense postures in Eastern Europe.

Conclusion​

The reports of a potential RS-26 launch towards Kiev underscore the heightened risks associated with the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. As both sides prepare for possible escalations, the international community continues to monitor developments closely, emphasizing the need for diplomatic efforts to mitigate tensions and prevent further military confrontations.

 

[Akbar26]

War coming!! Russia is expanding its building of nuclear-resistant bomb shelters amid ramped-up threats of WW3.
Russia has conducted nationwide drills and training for its population in nuclear preparedness!
The US DHS has done nothing to prepare the US population for war! Literally nothing…

View attachment 1034525

Recent reports indicate that massive Russian strikes are underway across Ukraine, prompting air raid sirens to sound in multiple cities, including Kiev. This escalation follows a series of significant aerial assaults targeting Ukraine's energy infrastructure and civilian areas.

Key Developments​

1. Widespread Attacks: Russian forces have launched one of the largest aerial attacks in months, utilizing over 120 missiles and 90 drones aimed primarily at energy facilities. Major cities affected include Odesa, Dnipro, and Kyiv, leading to widespread power outages and damage to critical infrastructure.
2. Casualties and Damage: The recent strikes have resulted in at least five fatalities and numerous injuries across various regions. Reports indicate that two people were killed in Odesa, while drone strikes in Mykolaiv claimed additional lives. The attacks have significantly disrupted heating, water, and electricity services, particularly as winter approaches.
3. Ukrainian Response: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reported that Ukrainian defense forces successfully intercepted a substantial number of aerial threats during the assault, with over 140 targets reportedly neutralized. However, some facilities still suffered damage due to direct hits and debris from intercepted missiles.
4. Strategic Context: This wave of attacks coincides with ongoing territorial gains by Russian forces along the eastern front lines. Ukrainian officials have expressed concerns about a potential imminent Russian offensive, particularly in regions like Zaporizhia.
5. International Reactions: The international community continues to condemn Russia's actions, viewing them as violations of humanitarian law. There are increasing calls for accountability regarding the targeting of civilian infrastructure.
6. Escalation of Conflict: The situation is further complicated by Ukraine's recent use of U.S.-made ATACMS missiles to strike targets within Russia's Bryansk region. This marks a significant escalation in the conflict as Ukraine seeks to retaliate against ongoing Russian aggression.

Conclusion​

The current wave of massive Russian strikes across Ukraine highlights the intensifying conflict as both sides prepare for continued hostilities amid deteriorating conditions for civilians. With air raid sirens sounding across major cities, the urgency for effective defense measures and international support becomes increasingly critical as Ukraine braces for the challenges of winter warfare.

 

[Soldier35]

Combat use of Russian Kh-101 cruise missiles in Ukraine on November 17. The video shows Kh-101 cruise missile strikes on the Kremenchug hydroelectric power station, on the underwater part of the station and the consequences of the strike on the hydroelectric power station. At the end of the video there is an insert, strikes of Russian Kh-101 missiles on November 17, on the PS 330/110 electrical substation in the city of Rivne.
The Kh-101 missile has a range of up to 5,500 km, and a 400 kg warhead. Some versions of the Kh-101 missiles have an 800 kg warhead, the warhead of the missile was recently increased by reducing the fuel tank. The Kh-102 missile version can be equipped with a 250-kiloton nuclear warhead.
According to media reports, the damage to the Kremenchug hydroelectric power station in Ukraine is serious, including critical disruption of the hydro turbines, destruction of the shandor and local damage to the dam.

 

[RoadAmerica]

This guy below makes convincing argument.

@IlyaTERA 5 days ago
@Aijaleena Yeah but your point is invalid, because Russia hasnt even had full mobilisation. Literally just paid contract soldiers. Ukraine however is mobilising much more harshly by literally dragging people off the streeets into vans and delivering them straight to the trenches. Do some research and find out how many Russian soldiers entered Ukraine on day 1. It is not a number that is sufficient to try to take a massive country like that, simply because it wasnt the intention.

@yaahoo5041 5 days ago
@IlyaTERA no, you tell us for what they only need East Ukraine if you're so well informed.

@IlyaTERA 5 days ago
@yaahoo5041 Sure its extremely simple, the majority of the population in eastern ukraine is Russian-speaking and were oppressed by the Kiev regime, hence the 4 oblasts declared independence via a referendum and asked for help from Russia. They are happy to be in the Russian Federation now. Enjoy.


Russia has what they want. Trump will call off the war. He said he will sit with Putin and Zelensky.

Stopped reading after “Russia hasn’t mobilized just paying contract soldiers”.
seriously? It’s day 1001 of the 3 day special Military operation.
Russia is a joke and Putin proves it on a weakly basis with his nuclear saber rattling. His convention military is completely toast.

Genocide Joe wants to escalate the war before he leaves. Russia won't fall for it. Trump will end the war.

Yea trump will and not on putins terms.
Where are the nukes, Putin said he’d let them fly if ATACAMS were used. Well they were and crickets as expected.
Russia is a used up vassal state

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has publicly stated that Italy does not support U.S. President Joe Biden'srecent decision to authorize Ukraine to strike military targets inside Russia with long-range missiles. This stance reflects Italy's commitment to a more restrained approach regarding the use of military aid supplied to Ukraine.

Key Points​

• Italy's Position: Meloni emphasized that Italy's military support for Ukraine is focused on defensive measures and that Italian-supplied weapons should only be used within Ukrainian territory. This aligns with comments made by Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani, who reiterated that Italy's position has not changed regarding the limitations on the use of its military supplies.
• Differing Approach from the U.S.: While the U.S. has allowed Ukraine to utilize long-range missiles for strikes deep into Russian territory, Meloni has articulated a different approach, prioritizing air defense and avoiding actions that could escalate the conflict further. She acknowledged the U.S.'s response to Russian aggression but maintained that Italy would adhere to its policy of using weapons strictly for defense within Ukraine.
• Concerns Over Escalation: Meloni's comments reflect broader concerns about the potential for escalation in the conflict if Ukraine were to strike Russian territory with Western-supplied weapons. There is apprehension that such actions could provoke a stronger military response from Russia, complicating the already tense situation.

Broader Implications​

• Impact on NATO Unity: Italy's position may create rifts within NATO, as member countries navigate their responses to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. While many allies support robust military assistance, differing views on the use of such aid can lead to tensions in collective strategy.
• Political Reactions in Italy: The decision not to support Biden's authorization may resonate with certain factions within Italian politics, particularly those advocating for a more cautious approach to military involvement and emphasizing diplomatic solutions.

Conclusion​

Prime Minister Meloni's rejection of Biden's decision underscores Italy's distinct stance on military support for Ukraine. As NATO allies grapple with how best to respond to Russian aggression while maintaining unity, Italy’s cautious approach highlights the complexities of international relations in the context of ongoing conflict.

View attachment 1034497

Cool nobody cares about Italy

War coming!! Russia is expanding its building of nuclear-resistant bomb shelters amid ramped-up threats of WW3.
Russia has conducted nationwide drills and training for its population in nuclear preparedness!
The US DHS has done nothing to prepare the US population for war! Literally nothing…

View attachment 1034525

And you think that will save the Russia peasants?
Please educate yourself

 

[RoadAmerica]

In a significant escalation of the conflict, Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered the Black Sea Fleet to prepare for operations aimed at destroying American ATACMS missile launchers located in multiple areas of Ukraine. This directive comes in the wake of Ukraine's recent use of ATACMS missiles, which have been authorized by U.S. President Joe Bidenfor strikes against Russian targets.

Key Developments:​

• Putin's Directive: Putin's order emphasizes a proactive military strategy, focusing on neutralizing the threat posed by ATACMS, which have been used effectively by Ukrainian forces to target Russian military assets deep within their territory.
• Operational Readiness: The Russian Air Force, Navy, and missile launchers are reportedly on high alert, prepared to respond to any further Ukrainian missile strikes. This readiness indicates an expectation of continued hostilities and a determination to protect Russian interests in the region.
• U.S. Authorization for Ukraine: Biden's recent decision allows Ukraine to utilize ATACMS missiles against Russian forces, significantly altering the dynamics of the conflict. These missiles have a range of up to 190 miles (approximately 300 kilometers) and are capable of delivering substantial payloads, making them a formidable threat to Russian positions.
• Escalating Tensions: The authorization for Ukraine to strike inside Russia has raised concerns about potential retaliation from Moscow. Russian officials have warned that such actions could lead to severe consequences, potentially escalating the conflict further.

Implications:​

• Strategic Impact: The use of ATACMS by Ukraine could significantly affect the operational capabilities of Russian forces, particularly in regions where they have concentrated their military assets. Targeting missile launchers could hinder Russia's ability to conduct effective operations against Ukraine.
• International Reactions: This escalation is likely to draw attention from international observers and may prompt discussions among NATO allies regarding further support for Ukraine. The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for regional stability.
• Military Dynamics: As both sides prepare for potential escalations, the conflict continues to evolve, with each side seeking to leverage their military capabilities effectively. The introduction of advanced weaponry on both sides complicates the battlefield dynamics and raises the stakes for all involved.

This development underscores the ongoing volatility in the region and highlights the challenges of managing a conflict that has drawn in multiple international actors and interests.

View attachment 1034437View attachment 1034438

so putler has been waiting 3 years to take out the ATACAMS?
Go home Putin, you’ve shown the world how weak Russia really is

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Stopped reading after “Russia hasn’t mobilized just paying contract soldiers”.
seriously? It’s day 1001 of the 3 day special Military operation.
Russia is a joke and Putin proves it on a weakly basis with his nuclear saber rattling. His convention military is completely toast.


Yea trump will and not on putins terms.
Where are the nukes, Putin said he’d let them fly if ATACAMS were used. Well they were and crickets as expected.
Russia is a used up vassal state


Cool nobody cares about Italy


And you think that will save the Russia peasants?
Please educate yourself

This is the joke

Russia hits 700,000 casualties in Ukraine says Britain

British intelligence reveals over 700,000 Russian casualties in Ukraine plus the destruction of 3,558 tanks, 147 helicopters, 132 fixed-wing aircraft, more than 8,500 armoured vehicles, 1,750 artillery systems, and 26 warships.

ukdefencejournal.org.uk

Casualties sound grossly inflated. Putin eagerly awaits Trump as President. Wonder why. He is in the driver's seat and Trump knows it. It is already a win for Putin because Trump has promised to meet him. At the moment he cannot travel to the West. The world will get to know the true picture of Ukraine's defeat when their territory shrinks.

 

[sidkhan2]

Recent developments indicate that Ukraine has escalated its military operations by using UK-supplied Storm Shadow missilesagainst targets inside Russia for the first time. This action follows a significant shift in policy from Western allies, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, allowing Ukraine to target Russian territory directly.

Key Points​

1. First Use of Storm Shadow Missiles: Ukrainian forces reportedly launched Storm Shadow missiles at Russian military targets, marking a notable escalation in the conflict. This comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had long advocated for the use of long-range missiles to strike deep into Russian territory.
2. Recent Authorization: The use of these missiles coincides with a recent authorization from U.S. President Joe Biden, who approved the deployment of American long-range ATACMS missiles against Russian targets just days prior. This shift reflects a broader strategy among Western allies to enhance Ukraine's military capabilities.
3. Targets and Impact: Reports suggest that the missiles were aimed at military installations in regions such as Kursk, which is near the Ukrainian border. The Storm Shadow is designed to penetrate fortified positions, making it effective against military command centers and munitions depots.
4. Response from Russia: The Kremlin has condemned these actions, stating that using Western weapons to strike within its territory constitutes a significant escalation of hostilities. Russia has warned that such developments could increase tensions and potentially lead to broader conflict.
5. Geopolitical Concerns: The timing of these missile strikes raises concerns about the potential for escalating conflict, especially with former President Donald Trump's return to office on the horizon. Some analysts fear that increased military actions could provoke a more aggressive response from Russia, leading to wider regional instability.
6. Public and Military Reactions: Ukrainian officials have emphasized their commitment to defending their territory and responding forcefully to Russian aggression. Meanwhile, there are calls for continued support from Western nations to ensure Ukraine can maintain its defensive operations.

Broader Implications​

• Potential for Escalation: The deployment of long-range missiles into Russian territory could provoke a stronger military response from Moscow, raising fears of a wider conflict.
• International Dynamics: The situation complicates international relations as Western nations balance their support for Ukraine with concerns about provoking Russia further.
• Military Strategy: Ukraine's use of Storm Shadow missiles signifies a strategic shift in its approach to countering Russian advances and may influence future military tactics on both sides.

Conclusion​

The reported use of UK-supplied Storm Shadow missiles by Ukraine against targets in Russia marks a critical escalation in the ongoing conflict. As both sides prepare for potential repercussions, the international community watches closely, aware that these developments could reshape the dynamics of the war and influence geopolitical stability in the region.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1859253924038922480