Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1710918566780825855

 

[aziqbal]

https://x.com/gabezzozz/status/1710923460094919024?s=46&t=y0OFodoGxInwRRrH23SIWA

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1710943003039146362

https://twitter.com/x/status/1710968119059976702

https://twitter.com/x/status/1710960304220221566

 

[Vergennes]

so beautiful

https://twitter.com/x/status/1710994871622766647

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

That's because of patriot act after 9-11, and that's national security issue, not the same thing.


Seeking employment is volunteer, but you cannot discriminate people because of their political belief, and believing in 4A is a political believe.

Show me a case where an employer is convicted for asking for ID then…

An employer has the right to have a CV, a right to get references.
They also have the right to verify the contents of the CV.
Do You think the CIA would hire someone without a background check?
The 4th amendment bans unreasonable behaviour, not reasonable behaviour.

If someone would sue, then they would be called up as a witness, and anonymous witnesses are an anomaly in Western law. You have to have a strong case for that.
”I don’t want the CIA to know I am a Russian FSB agent”, is not going to be a strong argument. So you would have to show proof who you are in court.

So no, you cannot post an employment ads saying applicant need to show their ID or valid identification are require for hiring. That's violate 4A right because you took away that right, not the person in question. You can ask them, and they can say no, and that cannot have any consequence if they say no.

I’d like some proof of that.
That you cannot verify a CV is enough reason not to hire someone.

The problem here are you think it's reasonable to ask people for ID and they have to show it, it's not, that is not one of the reasonable act to show people ID, in fact, the issue of getting an ID so you can show anyone themselves is unreasonable, it's unreasonable to have assume every American Citizen to have any form of ID to show you when you hire people. Let alone as I explained that a 4A violation.

If they want to do it, fine, but it's not up to the employer to decide.

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1711003524035641671

 

[vizier]

I think the next big zelensky show for the investors to show that they are "winning" would be some spectacular attack on Crimean bridge with numerous stormshadow and kamikaze drones. That being said Ukranian bridges over Dnieper are also totally vulnurable.

List of crossings of the Dnieper - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Russia can come up with their own version of Glonass guided unmanned sea drones something like the sea baby drone of Ukraine. Their drones have starlink real time video feed but glonass would be enough I think since bridges are static tatgets unlike ships that they use to hit. Damaging-destroying the columns of Dnieper crossings would definetly reduce Ukranian military supply chain. Drones can be dropped from Kherson or North from Balerus depending on the targeted bridge.

or better under water drone similar to this one and Ukranian bridges are much more vulnurable to this kind of attack.

The difficult part is the bridges are dual use so hitting during civilian traffic(which Ukraine did several times) would not be suitable. Giving prior notice would increase defenses but giving large time window and multiple targets would still be quiet effective.

 

[The SC]

The Fall |Russian Breakthrough In Kupiansk. S300 Destroyed In Nikolaev. Military Summary 2023.10.8​

 

[MeFishToo]

I think the next big zelensky show for the investors to show that they are "winning" would be some spectacular attack on Crimean bridge with numerous stormshadow and kamikaze drones. That being said Ukranian bridges over Dnieper are also totally vulnurable.

List of crossings of the Dnieper - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Russia can come up with their own version of Glonass guided unmanned sea drones something like the sea baby drone of Ukraine. Their drones have starlink real time video feed but glonass would be enough I think since bridges are static tatgets unlike ships that they use to hit. Damaging-destroying the columns of Dnieper crossings would definetly reduce Ukranian military supply chain. Drones can be dropped from Kherson or North from Balerus depending on the targeted bridge.

or better under water drone similar to this one and Ukranian bridges are much more vulnurable to this kind of attack.

The difficult part is the bridges are dual use so hitting during civilian traffic(which Ukraine did several times) would not be suitable. Giving prior notice would increase defenses but giving large time window and multiple targets would still be quiet effective.

I believe the Glonass has a 5-10 meter horizontal precision and the russian battle damage assassment has been close to none existent outside drone reach. Given the amount of western supplied air defence systems to Ukraine since the beginning of the russian invasion, Russias ability to actually destroy every bridge over the Dnieper is quite slim.

 

[vizier]

I believe the Glonass has a 5-10 meter horizontal precision and the russian battle damage assassment has been close to none existent outside drone reach. Given the amount of western supplied air defence systems to Ukraine since the beginning of the russian invasion, Russias ability to actually destroy every bridge over the Dnieper is quite slim.

Air defence cannot detect sea drones and much less likely underwater drones traveling under Dnieper. Glonass precision may not be enough to hit the column of the bridge. In that case terminal guidance can be with image pattern recognition for surface drone and maybe a sonar range finder-scanner for underwater drone to hit the column of the bridge to bring it down.

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1711083845167067523

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1711257165258727720

 

[altafahmed]

Russia will lose this war of attrition.

The Russians fired 60,000 artillery rounds per day during the last year summer offensive, now 4,000 rounds per day, same amount of Ukraine artillery firing rate rounds per day. Russia can only make 1-2 million rounds per year.

Russia lose 4-5 tanks per day, but can make max. 1 tank per day. In total 9,100 tanks and armor vehicles are lost since the war began. 280,000 Russian soldiers dead or wounded.

Russia last hope is the US giving up on Ukraine.

This is the most probable ending of the war.

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1711374473377513821

 

[Viet]

This is the most probable ending of the war.

Ah that’s far from over. Biden still has a joker even if the congress stops the fundings. He can give the presidential order to give weapons to Ukraine direct from the US army.