I think You misunderstand ”standing”.
View attachment 959009
This rule does not force you to carry an ID all the time.
You just have to show it
once to Your employer.
It does not force you into a religion, stop you from protesting, join an assembly etc.
You do not have to do what the government tells you.
It does stop illegal aliens from being legally employed, making it much less attractive to enter the US.
It can certainly be implemented in such a way that you provide you SSN somewhere to get employed without the employer actually knowing your SSN, but it is also impossible to get an employment without an SSN.
That really depends on what amendments are done.
Forcing people to have a valid id which needs to be shown in a few situations is really not restricting freedom.
If people believe that the government should not be able to track illegal aliens, then those people should stop whining about it.
I think You misunderstand ”standing”.
View attachment 959009
Well, call it jurisdiction or whatever you want, it does not change the fact that the court cannot hear that case because it does not take side on any proceeding, again, Supreme Court only can hear matter related to the Constitution.
This rule does not force you to carry an ID all the time.
You just have to show it once to Your employer.
It does not force you into a religion, stop you from protesting, join an assembly etc.
You do not have to do what the government tells you.
It does stop illegal aliens from being legally employed, making it much less attractive to enter the US.
Dude, the question is why would I have to show the ID to the employer, even the government cannot ask for my ID unless there is a probable clause or reasonable suspicion as per 4A, what rights are given to the company? 4A is a very serious amendment we follow as an American. It's not going to be chipping away that easy to just to require to show it here and there.
It can certainly be implemented in such a way that you provide you SSN somewhere to get employed without the employer actually knowing your SSN, but it is also impossible to get an employment without an SSN.
Again, why we want that to begin with? And even so, how? We aren't talking about the internet when you can provide an API instead of your detail, you either have to be able to verify who you are, which mean you need to be able to identify yourself, or it would be a moot point showing anything to anyone, I mean tell me in what way I can verify your employment status without asking information from you that you can identify yourself?
That really depends on what amendments are done.
Forcing people to have a valid id which needs to be shown in a few situations is really not restricting freedom.
If you are requiring showing ID to the employer, it already meant
YOU ARE FORCED TO HAVE ONE. Otherwise, how would I get an employment if I do not process any form of ID? Again, you can apply for an ID if you want to be it Driver License, or Passport, but whether or not you use them or whether or not you actually need to apply for them is YOUR CHOICE. Also, the SSN is designed NOT TO BE a form of ID. So even if you know my social security number it wouldn't mean shit.
Forcing people to show ID, which you may not have even if you are US Citizens, which is within your right to do so, mean forcing you to do something you don't want to do.
If people believe that the government should not be able to track illegal aliens, then those people should stop whining about it.
The issue here is not whether or not people want the government to track Illegal, the issue is how, in a perfect world, you would stop them at the border, and you don't have illegal mixed into your community. But we aren't living in a perfect world. The problem here is, you should do your job and secure the border, not limiting my right and taken away my free will so you can do the stuff we pay you to do. You may be okay to have a piece of paper to identify you, a lot of other people, including me, don't.
www.telegraph.co.uk
