What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

. .
Not sure where the full 3500 years came from.
They just make it up. But they dont need to. The Anglo empire has given them that patch of land. that 17,000 sq/km and they will keep it until the empire says no more. Or the empire weakens.
Comes from the fact not all Jews were exiled and Jews always had presence in this land.

until the Freemasonry empowered the Jews to seize the Holland in 1948.
Lol
 
.
Stupidest statistic. A nation could invade a nation, kill one civilian, then leave without a fight and be at the top of the list. Genocide is decimating the population. Decimate is to kill 10% of the civilian population. Moscow has genocided many ethnic groups, some over and over again. Some to the applause of the Iranians in support of genocide. This was before the cia zionist wars in the middle east. Before George Bush started the taking out Putin regimes in the Middle East. Iran supported Moscow genocides of ethnic groups. If Iran supports this genocidal war on Ukraine, which is the continuation of the subjugation by Moscow, then Iran supports the holodomor genocide by Moscow. No people should be ruled over by those that genocided them, not Chechens, not Crimean Tatars, not Ukrainians, not Circassians (Soshi must be returned to Circassians), and not the many conquered tribes, conquered by the genocidal Romanovs and Russians.

Does Washington/London have the right to invade and annex Iraq. If not, neither does Moscow have any privileges to do that to Ukraine.

Revenge! Revenge! Revenge! against those nations that supported Moscow genociding the Chechens in the 90s. Since Iran supported the ACTUAL genocide of Chechens, REVENGE against Iran. Bomb pro-genocide Iran. So McCain was right and proper in wanting to bomb Iran, by Iranian standards.

Add to that the 18-19th centuries Circassian Genocide.

Ah no, Mr. Putin is not a Jihadist-loving warrior, unlike some radicals have come to believe.


The Circassian genocide,[6][7][8][9][10] or Tsitsekun,[a] was the Russian Empire's systematic mass murder, ethnic cleansing, and expulsion of 80–97%[6][10] of the Circassian population, around 800,000–1,500,000 people,[6][7][8] during and after the Russo-Circassian War (1763–1864).[4][12][13] The peoples planned for removal were mainly the Circassians, but other Muslim peoples of the Caucasus were also affected.[12] Several methods used by Russian forces such as impaling and tearing the bellies of pregnant women were reported.[4][14] Russian generals such as Grigory Zass described the Circassians as "subhuman filth", and glorified the mass murder of Circassian civilians,[4][15][16] justified their use in scientific experiments,[17] and allowed their soldiers to rape women.[4]
 
Last edited:
.
Comes from the fact not all Jews were exiled and Jews always had presence in this land.


In 637 AD, Muslims led by Omar Bin Khaddab (ra), the Second Leader of Islam after the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah (swt) be upon him), seized the Holy Land from the Byzantium Christian rulers. Under the Treaty signed by Khalif Omar (ra) and Byzantium Patriarch Sophronius, "No Jews were allowed to live in Jerusalem". (Source: https://www.islamicity.org/11511/capture-of-jerusalem-the-treaty-of-umar/)

Let us not forget under the Byzantium Christian rulers, who ruled the Holy Land between 70 BCE - 637 AD, no Jew was allowed to live in the Holy Land.

In your faith, you call it living in the diaspora between the time the Second Temple was destroyed (70 BCE) till the formation of the current Israel in 1948.

So my question is, if you believed in living in the diaspora for over 2000 years and Byzantium rulers didn't even allow you to live in the Holy Land for the time they controlled, how can you justify the continued 3500 years of presence that you claimed? That is 2700 years that Jews didn't have a presence or their existence in the Holy Land was very minuscule.

Fyi, I am not denying Jewish presence in the Holy Land in different times depending upon their situation; I am just questioning the new claim that has been manufactured recently that states 3500 years of continued presence when the facts show otherwise.
 
Last edited:
. . .
In 637 AD, Muslims led by Omar Bin Khaddab (ra), the Second Leader of Islam after the Prophet (peace be upon), seized the Holy Land from the Byzantium Christian rulers. Under the Treaty signed by Khalif Omar (ra) and Byzantium Patriarch Sophronius, "No Jews were allowed to live in Jerusalem". (Source: https://www.islamicity.org/11511/capture-of-jerusalem-the-treaty-of-umar/)

Let us not forget under the Byzantium Christian rulers, who ruled the Holy Land between 70 BCE - 637 AD, no Jew was allowed to live in the Holy Land.

In your faith, you call it living in the diaspora between the time the Second Temple was destroyed (70 BCE) till the formation of the current Israel in 1948.

So my question is, if you believed in living in the diaspora for over 2000 years and Byzantium rulers didn't even allow you to live in the Holy Land for the time they controlled, how can you justify the continued 3500 years of presence that you claimed? That is 2700 years that Jews didn't have a presence or their existence in the Holy Land was very minuscule.

Fyi, I am not denying Jewish presence in the Holy Land in different times depending upon their situation; I am just questioning the new claim that has been manufactured recently that states 3500 years of continued presence when the facts show otherwise.
Why do you bother with him. Even if you convince him you are right, he’s not going to pack up and go back to Poland or Romania or wherever he comes from. He’s found his place under the sun with the protection of the empire and he will do what he has to do to keep his country.

Just don’t forget that these people have been genocided and kicked out of every empire that has come into contact with them for last 3,000 years, starting with Egypt and ending with Europe.

The Anglo empire is one political crisis away from turning into an orgy of torch lighting, book burning Nazi rally type of stuff. Just look at parts of America where the white people feel marginalised.

So history is likely to just repeat itself, sadly.
 
.
Last edited:
.
Need more strong camo nets! Make it wider to cover the angles of the attack to make it harder to hit.


Tanks are becoming a thing of the past for countries at war that cant replace or/and fix them fast enough- and this is why Ukraine is using alot more pickup trucks on the frontline, which is obviously more risky, because they are less protected, and Ukraine is asking for "western tanks", so even NATO and Ukraine know tanks are relevant, but also Orynx tells us that Russia has lost 8500 tanks and military vehicles- so how then are Russian troops today still using and riding around with T72/T90/T6x etc tanks and BTRs and BMPs, etc? War is logistics!!
Uh because Russia has a lot of tanks. 20k plus tanks. Course many are in bad condition but they still able to bring old tanks like T64s into the war. Was expecting thousands of T90s and the newer T14s being brought into the war. Not happening.
 
Last edited:
.

>> are the migs about to be finally retired and ”sold” to Ukraine? Will they be upgraded to operate jdams(if not already.)….

According to wiki Poland has 23 mig -29 in it's service.



Why do you bother with him. Even if you convince him you are right, he’s not going to pack up and go back to Poland or Romania or wherever he comes from.


You are aware that most of the Israelis that live here today , where actually born here . It will make as much sense for them to go to Poland as you to Zimbabwe . And what ever part of the story you agree too , it is understandable why they feel a strong historical and religious connection to this land.

You are aware that you are explaining stuff to a person, who is " on the fence " on whether the holocaust happened or not , while his only vision or solving this conflict is by some sort of Armageddon.


~
 
Last edited:
. .
So NATO lost to Taliban?
Yes. But the issue was not military might yet being unable to further nation-build/prop up a lasting alternative to the taliban.

We thought afghans would “naturally” flock to western culture/ideals in mass. That we could easily reform a broken/tribal/corrupt society. This was a mistake/too arrogant.
 
.
Putin isolated as neutral powers join West in anti-Russia rhetoric

TOKYO -- As it has little chance of defeating Ukraine with conventional arms, Russia is destroying the country's vital civilian infrastructure, such as power plants and housing units, to make people freeze and lose their will to fight.

Russia's action is tantamount to torture of the Ukrainian people and must be stopped as soon as possible. For that, it is necessary to further isolate Moscow to weaken President Vladimir Putin's will and ability to carry on the war.

 
.
Russia will meet it's objectives at any cost. It's as simple as that. They have the manpower and resouces.
The question is how much is the West willing to sacrifice for one of the most corrupt country's in the world to the cost and detriment of it's own civilians?

Russia never was or has never been a threat to the West as the MSM wants us to believe. They simply wanted to live on fair terms and specified certain red lines that were not to be crossed. Unfortunately, the West belligerently crossed those lines despite multiple promises and so Russia had no choice but to act.

The only logical actor here is Putin. He wants peace but once Ukraine accepts certain terms. The puppet clown Zulensky is just prolonging the suffering of his people but he couldn't give a toss as he's in his fully heated underground office meeting and greeting Hollywood stars. Ukrainians need to kick the tracksuit wearing clown out ASAP for the greater good of Ukraine. Peace talks are the only sensible way out of this whole mess otherwise it's looking like the escalation ladder can be climbed very quickly. Is it really worth it? I think not.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom