Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[Hack-Hook]

what i see is that two projectile get intercepted by Ukrainian infrastructures not Ukraine air-defense one at 00:21 and another at
what you see from 00:32 is not interception but some sort of flak cannon detonating and try to make a wall of shrapnel in front of the incoming projectiles and again at 00:46 another infrastructure successfully intercept an incoming projectile
Its clear that Air-Defense failed again wonder in which second actually Iranian drones get destroyed (well obviously beside the destruction of those two projectile in 00:21 and 00:46)

 

[jhungary]

what i see is that two projectile get intercepted by Ukrainian infrastructures not Ukraine air-defense one at 00:21 and another at
what you see from 00:32 is not interception but some sort of flak cannon detonating and try to make a wall of shrapnel in front of the incoming projectiles and again at 00:46 another infrastructure successfully intercept an incoming projectile
Its clear that Air-Defense failed again wonder in which second actually Iranian drones get destroyed (well obviously beside the destruction of those two projectile in 00:21 and 00:46)

It's quite obvious they are the same interception just differnet angle.

And You can see the object exploded in the air if you stop the video at 0:20, also at 0:49. you can see the blast radius is above the skyline and behind the building, suggested the object exploded in the air.

Unless that is an Russian airburst, whatever is shooting at was intercepted.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585206315772960768

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585218820599590914

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585216638390968320

 

[Hack-Hook]

It's quite obvious they are the same interception just differnet angle.

And You can see the object exploded in the air if you stop the video at 0:20, also at 0:49. you can see the blast radius is above the skyline and behind the building, suggested the object exploded in the air.

Unless that is an Russian airburst, whatever is shooting at was intercepted.

in 21 the explosion is clearly on the ground , you can see it by the fact that the brightest point in video is on the ground not in sky and then you see something on the ground on fire

its also the case about 00:46 so I say no the interception occurred by infrastructure not Air-Defense

 

[jhungary]

in 21 the explosion is clearly on the ground , you can see it by the fact that the brightest point in video is on the ground not in sky and then you see something on the ground on fire

its also the case about 00:46 so I say no the interception occurred by infrastructure not Air-Defense

I don't know what you are looking at

This is not a ground det......You can see the reference point at the time of explosion, the center is above ground.

And the one at 47 second is the same explosion just on a different angle....

You count the explosion the moment it exploded. Which is between 0:19 to 0:20. Whatever it is would have been drop to the ground in a fireball, that's why you saw it on the ground at 0:21...in fact, you can see the fireball gone down.

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585253803145965568

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585258653833367552

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585261755902697472

Russian army no longer looks like an army,but a ragtag militia

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585189105201483777

 

[Hack-Hook]

I don't know what you are looking at

View attachment 889469

This is not a ground det......You can see the reference point at the time of explosion, the center is above ground.

And the one at 47 second is the same explosion just on a different angle....

You count the explosion the moment it exploded. Which is between 0:19 to 0:20. Whatever it is would have been drop to the ground in a fireball, that's why you saw it on the ground at 0:21...in fact, you can see the fireball gone down.

If you compare it to the rest of the video you see the red line is buildings tops and the blue line is water line
the explosion is in line with buildings tops , your mistake is that because its above water line you think its above the ground .

by the way your theory don't explain the explosion and the fire after it .
secondary fire
before

after

this two photo clearly shows the explosion is on building tops .
in your photo the camera become blind , so it cant be used as a good photo for studying what exactly happened

 

[Hack-Hook]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585253803145965568

Thanks for posting this exact example of war Crime
@A.P. Richelieu please add this to your list of War crimes

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585253803145965568

International Criminal Court 2002​

Firing upon a Combat Medic with clear insignia.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585276460981444614

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585250782756352003

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585280082855317505

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585278786219786240

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585268173670080513

 

[RoadAmerica]

I wonder why is Russia going easy on Ukraine , it can easily withdraw from kherson and other places and bomb it to stone age but Russia is not resorting to it , they may have other plans either way the only loser will be Ukraine while the Jewish pm and president of Ukraine will settle in Israel or somewhere in US who were brought into power by usa

They’re not going easy, they simply don’t have the ability

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Spoiler: Graphic

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585283142365204481

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585254001779826688