Ukraine must take back Crimea and Donbas. And yes, that is crushing Russia. That is a total Ukrainian victory. Then EU can get natural gas from Ukrainian reserves, not Russia. As Europe diversifies. However, this goes against the US policy to stop a strong independent EU that surpasses the US in power. The UK/US goal is to keep Germany down, not rivaling the UK/US.
Excluding Russia’s gas reserves in Asia, Ukraine today holds the second biggest known gas reserves in Europe. As of late 2019, known Ukrainian reserves amounted to
1.09 trillion cubic meters of natural gas, second only to Norway’s known resources of 1.53 trillion cubic meters. Yet, these enormous reserves of energy remain largely untapped. Today, Ukraine has a low annual reserve usage rate of about 2 percent. Moreover, more active exploration may yield previously undiscovered gas fields, which would further increase the overall volume of Ukraine’s deposits.
A resolute development of Ukraine’s untapped reserves in the production, export and storage of energy would be in the interest of all sides involved.
hir.harvard.edu
The war in Ukraine is not about Russians living in Ukraine vs "Nazi Jew Zelensky". It is against EU independence from Russian gas, to steal the areas of Ukraine with gas that can replace the need of Russia. Russia is obsolete with Ukrainian gas sold to Europe. And Putin wants to destroy the EU for the cia Pompeo/Trump agenda. The hatred of Putin and Putinites concerning the EU predates the finding of the gas reserves in Ukraine. The Putin policy is the US policy of keep Germany and EU weak.
It’s time to say it: Donald Trump is a mortal threat to the Western alliance.
www.politico.eu
Europeans are more hated by the US deepstate than China is hated. China is easily manipulated for 50 cents. As a lifeless puppet, the US can easily pull the strings of China for US ends. Europeans have morals and values that don't include supporting totalitarianism, that include freedom and democracy and the ability to be successful nations that rise above the US/UK. For that this is in progress:
(BTW, Quigley who taught at Georgetown [teaching Bill Clinton and the both Pelosi husband and wife], wrote the book on much of the information in the above video. Peter Hof and Docherty also referenced and accurate too. As are the other primary sourced books that are used. The narrator and producer of the video offers no evidence that UK in the 1890s started Franco-Russian alliance, no book that I am aware of touches this topic. I am not saying that it did or did not happen. I am saying Quigley does not mention this. And the two authors interviewed actually infer the opposite, that UK, as the history books show, was a late arrival into the Franco-Russian alliance. The famous scholar interviewed, Docherty, in the book tells that France and Russia were anti-UK when the Dual Alliance was signed. Corbett is a very poor researcher. Taking most of the best resources out there and arriving at the conclusion that Putin is the best fuhrer for Europe. I studied this extensively and that one piece of info I have been unable to find from the many scholars Corbett takes and puts the Corbett name to. Corbett is really a shotty "journalist". Taking the best well researched articles and twisting it, this is typical of the alt-wrong. Taking the modern classics and arriving at completely wrong conclusions that trump is fighting the deepstate and Putin should be your hero. The problem is not with the information provided by published authors and scholars, the leaders in the field. The problem is with Corbett. Could have the early Rhodes Round Table before the Franco-Russian alliance used connections to craft that agreement, perhaps. There is no evidence provided by Quigley and other scholars. There is evidence that the UK made sure to keep the Franco-Russian alliance continuing and having the UK join into the Triple Entente. Then the UK used crisis after crisis to blame Germany. This is referenced and sourced. Historians are taught the Franco-Prussian War and French revenge are reasons enough for France to side with Russia, who was jolted by Germany. Until primary sourced info is out, Corbett is to believed wrong on saying the UK crafted the Franco-Russian alliance, since it started in secret, it would difficult to pin on the UK even with UK involvement. What Corbett should have stated is the UK kept the Franco-Russian Alliance going and made it stronger in UK quest to destroy the rise of Germany. Corbett does zero investigative journalism, does shotty journalism, shotty research taken from those who are leaders in the field. Corbett gathers together already known info for well researched authors and journalists, then adds alt-wrong stuff into it)
The US/UK/Russia have been involved in an over 100 year project, known as the Entente, to keep down Germany and European states from banding together to rival UK and US. France and Russia are tools of the UK and US. Only during the late Soviet Union era was Russia free from UK and US control and manipulation to destroy Europe. Such a USSR eventually collapsed because they were cut-throat stalinists. Because Gorbachev did not want a war to destroy Europe, he let the USSR and empire collapse.
Chabad cia own Russia with the Bush cronies that own hundreds of billions in the oil and gas from project hammer.
www.wnd.com
