Much much more later ...
Partially banning slavery for white, Christians, neighbors countries, just shows the west Hypocrisy...
Britain marks 200 years on March 25 since it enacted a law banning the trans-Atlantic slave trade, although full abolition of slavery did not follow for another generation.
www.reuters.com
From banning slave trade fully or partially early 1800s to abolishment including colonies 1860-1890
And dont lie (again) in 1833 the brits also freed sa and caribean slaves. And atlantic slave trade was outlawed before that which suprise suprise is not about white slaves…
Lolz, how can Arabs bans slavery when their under west occupation
that still practice slavery in its colonies? ??
Barbary states stopped when forced to stop. Same for most of the gulf states, though much later.
Your “custodian” of the holy sites the saudis continued till what 1960?
But please try to wriggle around overwhelming evidence more. It amuses me.
Funny how your Racism tend you to point Ottomans (not Arabs in between) and the Gulf "mini states" and forget mighty U.S.A, can you tell me when slavery was abolished in USA ??? And In Germany as you are a German
.
Usa 1865 (bulk of them atleast)
Most arabs and ottomans considerably later. And/or forced to do so instead of from own abolitionist volition.
All your initial statements are falses concerning Arabs and slavery, that's what's important for me.
Main point stands. Arab practiced slavery for longer. We are talking about millions of slaves. And They were more often then not pressured or forced to stop.
Again you are missing completely the point, and calling it "Arab slave trade", i don't balme you too much, being a racist won't help you to have clear ideas.
en.m.wikipedia.org
Its the historic name….
But you only read those parts that you want to read and rip out the rest of the pages i understand…
Where was the biggest slaves concentration, in the Arab or in the west world ?
Well castrated slaves, more slaves dying from the transport, slave children being freemen faster, transporting slaves instead of end destination….
kinda plays against the creation of a distinct group/large concentration.
Does nothing to the amount of people slaved and killed. But an explanation on why this horror is “forgotten” so much compared to atlantic slavery.
But Nice try though. Semantics are all you have. Morals are long gone.
The west didn't banned slavery for democracy or human rights, they needed cheap labour after the industrial revolution.
Ripping out history pages on the motivation of the abolitionist and the debates (sometimes religious) around it? Again?
Arabs where small employees in the hands of the West big traders and business-men.
Estimation of a million european slaves.
Estimations of 9 million black slaves
Slavery from well before and well after the europeans started and stopped it.
Doesnt add up does it?
But please..wriggle more…