What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

an episode of a battle of a Russian unit, during the storming of a stronghold of the Ukrainian army located in a former livestock complex. The video allows you to immerse yourself in the real atmosphere of the war in Ukraine. The authors did not report the location of the shooting and which Ukrainian and Russian units participated in the battle. The video is shortened, the music inserted by the authors has been replaced, where possible, the original sound of the battle was left. Judging by the video, the assault was carried out by several Russian units from different directions, they were attacked by Ukrainian drones of the Baba Yaga type and DJI mavic drones. Presumably, mobilized military personnel participated in the battle. Armored vehicles supported the attack from the other side during the assault.

 
The Russian army has begun using the Inokhodets UAV, a strike version of the Orion UAV, to protect the Crimean coast. In the video, the Inokhodets UAV attacks an X-UAV, a Ukrainian sea drone, with a missile. The video was filmed on February 1, the model of the Ukrainian sea drone is unknown. Presumably, the MAGURA V5 sea drone from Spetstekhnoexport was used. Technical information about the Orion UAV and the Ukrainian sea drone is in the links to the video in the comments to the video.

 
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has expressed concerns regarding the substantial gap between the promised and actual aid received from the United States. In a recent statement, he noted that Ukraine has only received approximately $75 billion of the $177 billion pledged by the U.S. since the onset of the Russian invasion. Zelensky's remarks highlight ongoing frustrations with the aid delivery process, suggesting that issues such as "lobbying" and "corruption" may be contributing to the delays.

Key Points​

  1. Aid Discrepancy:
    • Zelensky's comments underscore a significant shortfall in aid delivery, with less than half of the promised funds reaching Ukraine. This gap raises questions about the efficiency and accountability of the aid distribution process.
  2. Concerns Over Accountability:
    • The Ukrainian president has called for greater transparency and efficiency in how military and financial assistance is allocated and delivered. He emphasized that understanding where the remaining funds are is crucial for Ukraine's ongoing defense efforts.
  3. Military Aid Challenges:
    • Zelensky mentioned his attempts to expedite weapon deliveries by suggesting that Ukraine use its own cargo planes instead of relying solely on U.S. transport aircraft, but these requests were not accommodated.
  4. Impact on Ukrainian Defense:
    • The delays in receiving promised aid have implications for Ukraine's military capabilities as it continues to face challenges on the battlefield against Russian forces. The need for timely support is critical as Ukraine seeks to maintain its defense posture.
  5. Broader Context:
    • The situation reflects broader concerns about international support for Ukraine amid shifting political landscapes in donor countries. As new administrations take power, there may be changes in foreign policy priorities that could affect ongoing support.
  6. Future Implications:
    • As discussions around military and humanitarian aid continue, Zelensky's statements may influence future negotiations with U.S. lawmakers and other international partners regarding the urgency and necessity of delivering promised support.

Conclusion​

Zelensky's acknowledgment of the discrepancies in U.S. aid highlights critical issues surrounding international support for Ukraine amidst ongoing conflict. As the situation evolves, ensuring that promised assistance is delivered effectively will be vital for Ukraine's defense strategy and overall stability in the region.

 
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has raised serious concerns regarding the discrepancy between the military aid promised by the United States and what Ukraine has actually received. In a recent statement, he noted that while the U.S. approved approximately $177 billion in aid, Ukraine has only received around $75 billion. Zelensky expressed frustration, stating, "I don’t know where all this money is," emphasizing that about $100 billionof the pledged funds have not reached Ukraine.

Key Points​

  1. Aid Discrepancy:
    • Zelensky's comments highlight a significant gap between the funds allocated by the U.S. government and those actually delivered to Ukraine. He clarified that much of the aid received has come in the form of military equipment rather than cash.
  2. Acknowledgment of Support:
    • Despite the shortfall, Zelensky acknowledged and expressed gratitude for the support Ukraine has received, particularly in military assistance. However, he stressed that claims of receiving $200 billion are inaccurate and misleading.
  3. Concerns Over Accountability:
    • The president's remarks have sparked discussions about potential corruption or inefficiencies within the aid distribution process. Zelensky suggested that there may be issues related to lobbying or mismanagement affecting how funds are allocated and tracked.
  4. Impact on Military Operations:
    • The lack of sufficient funding could have serious implications for Ukraine's ongoing military operations against Russia, especially as the conflict continues to evolve.
  5. Call for Transparency:
    • Zelensky urged for audits and greater transparency regarding U.S. aid programs to ensure that funds are utilized effectively and reach their intended purposes.
  6. Broader Context:
    • This revelation comes amid broader discussions about U.S. foreign aid, particularly as political dynamics shift in Washington, which may affect future support for Ukraine.

Conclusion​

Zelensky's statement underscores critical concerns regarding U.S. aid to Ukraine amidst an ongoing war with Russia. As he calls for clarity on the whereabouts of unreceived funds, the situation highlights the complexities of international support mechanisms and the need for enhanced oversight to ensure that promised assistance effectively reaches those in need.

 
Footage of two Russian FPV drones, controlled via fiber optic cable, striking a Ukrainian Challenger 2 tank. The video was filmed in the Kursk region of Russia, the exact date of filming is unknown. The Challenger 2 tank entered service with the UK in 1995. Ukraine has received 14 Challenger 2 tanks, but these tanks are rarely used. The result of the drone attack is unknown. Russian units using the Vandal FPV drone rarely use a second drone for surveillance, so the results of drone attacks are often unknown.

 
Footage of a Russian kamikaze drone "Lancet-51" hitting a Ukrainian M1A1 SA Abrams tank has been published. Production of M1 Abrams tanks began in the United States in 1980. The video was filmed near the village of Viktorovka, Kursk region of Russia. The tank was used by the 47th separate mechanized brigade "Magura" of the Ukrainian army. The M1A1 SA Abrams tank is additionally equipped with protection against drones in the form of a miniature "Barbecue" made of bars. As a result of the attack by the Russian drone "Lancet-51", the M1A1 SA Abrams tank was hit in the rear of the turret, in the area of the ammunition stowage of shells. Presumably, due to the lack of shells, or the defocusing of the cumulative jet, the shells did not explode. Judging by the video, the M1A1 Abrams tank is out of order.

 
An episode of a battle between two Ukrainian stormtroopers and one Russian soldier. The location of the shooting is not reported, the video is filmed and commented on by a Russian drone, but another unknown drone is also visible in the frame. As reported, the Russian stormtrooper captured a Ukrainian dugout. After that, Ukrainian servicemen tried to push it out of there. As a result of the battle, the Ukrainian stormtroopers retreated. The Russian soldier also later left the dugout due to shelling by Ukrainian artillery. As reported, the positions were later captured by Russian units, but this is not shown in the video.

 
The Ukrainian army has launched a new February counteroffensive in the Kursk region. This is the second counter offensive of the Ukrainian army, the first in January was previously shown. Fighting is taking place in the area of the settlements of Ulanok, Makhnovka, Konopelka. The goal of the offensive is to enter the rear of Russian troops and preserve the supply lines of the troops. There are no results yet, but there is video of drone attacks. Russian troops are using classic FPV drones and drones "Prince Vandal Novgorodsky", controlled by fiber optic cable. As reported, the drones attacked T-64 tanks, the Wisent 1 MC engineering vehicle, Cougar H armored vehicles, the M113 armored personnel carrier, and the Kozak armored vehicle and other equipment. At the moment, this is not complete data.

 
High-quality footage of a strike by a Russian FPV drone "Prince Vandal Novgorodsky", controlled via fiber optic cable, on a Ukrainian self-propelled gun Panzerhaubitze 2000. The Pzh 2000 self-propelled gun is equipped with a 155-mm cannon and has been produced in Germany since 1998, information about it is on the channel. The video was filmed near the village of Fedorovka, for an unknown reason, the Pzh 2000 self-propelled artillery gun ended up at the front line, at a distance of 8 km. Perhaps this is due to the lack of long-range active-reactive projectiles V-LAP or M982 Excalibur projectiles. Naturally, the Pzh 2000 self-propelled gun was immediately noticed by Russian drone operators. Judging by the video, the FPV drone "Vandal" struck the aft part of the howitzer, the place where the shells are stored. As a result of an attack by a Russian FPV drone, ammunition exploded in a Ukrainian Pzh 2000 howitzer.

 
Footage of an incredible breakthrough of a Russian, presumably BMP-2, under attack by Ukrainian drones. It is worth noting that Russian BMPs are often criticized for their weak protection, but even with minor modifications, the BMP can withstand multiple drone attacks, which is confirmed by this video. This is the second video on the channel showing that BMPs equipped with protection can withstand not only RPGs, but also drone attacks. In this case, the BMP-2 is equipped with screens on the sides and a "Mangal", protecting the combat vehicle from ammunition drops from above. The Russian BMP-2 is attacked by Ukrainian FPV drones, two Baba Yaga-type drones also drop ammunition on the BMP. The BMP crew skillfully uses one of the advantages of the combat vehicle, high speed, simultaneously firing suppressive fire. The location of the shooting is not reported, presumably the BMP broke through to the Ukrainian stronghold located in the forest belt. After which, it landed troops and retreated to its original positions.

 
Footage of the fall of a Russian Su-25 attack aircraft near the village of Zaitsevo in Donbass. According to Ukrainian media, the plane was shot down by a Ukrainian MANPADS. But when watching the video, you can notice inconsistencies: when the missile was launched from the MANPADS, the sky was covered with clouds, while at the time of the fall of the Su-25, the sky was clear. Also in the video, the flying plane catches fire before the MANPADS missile is launched. Perhaps the video used associative footage, but the launch of the MANPADS missile is shown from another episode of the battle. A search and rescue team was sent to the site of the Su-25 crash on an Mi-8 helicopter, which was covered by an Mi-35 helicopter. At the time of the evacuation of the pilot, the Russian Mi-8 helicopter was attacked by three Ukrainian FPV drones, judging by the video, the Ukrainian drones were unable to hit the helicopter and the pilot was evacuated.

 
President Zelensky has reportedly positioned Ukraine's natural resources, including rare earth elements and other critical minerals, as part of a potential deal with the U.S., specifically with former President Trump.

Here's a breakdown:
  • Ukraine's Mineral Resources: Ukraine is rich in critical minerals essential for modern technologies. These include titanium (largest reserves in Europe), lithium (a third of Europe's reserves), graphite (20% of global resources), as well as rare earth elements like beryllium, tantalum, and niobium. Other resources include gallium, uranium, zirconium, apatite, fluorite, and nickel.
  • Value of Resources: Estimates of the value of these resources vary, ranging from $12 trillion to $26 trillion. However, these figures should be viewed with caution, as many deposits are unexplored, and the quality and quantity of resources are still speculative.
  • Zelensky's Offer: Reports indicate that Zelensky's team delayed a deal on critical materials with the Biden administration to potentially offer it to Trump if he won the election.
  • Trump's Interest: Trump has signaled he is interested in negotiating an agreement where Kyiv guarantees supplies of rare earth metals. Some reports suggest he may trade aid to Ukraine for access to these minerals.
  • Russia's Control: A significant portion of Ukraine's mineral resources (up to 70%) are located in regions controlled by Russia, particularly in the Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, and Luhansk regions.
  • US Dependency: The U.S. relies on imports for some critical minerals, with China being a leading producer of rare earths. Ukraine's resources could provide an alternative source.
  • Ukraine's Strategic Importance: The EU Commission has described Ukraine as "a potential source of over 20 critical raw materials".
In summary, Ukraine possesses significant mineral resources that are of interest to the United States, and Zelensky has reportedly considered leveraging these resources in exchange for a security deal or aid from Trump. However, the extent and accessibility of these resources are subject to ongoing conflict and require further exploration

 
An episode of Russian special forces snipers at work in the Kremensky forest. There is no actual battle, the group is waiting for the return of three scouts who went ahead to reconnoiter Ukrainian positions. Judging by the video, the scouts started the battle, after which they retreated to the positions of the main group, shown at the end of the video. A Ukrainian mortar fired at the scouts. As a result of the battle, one scout was wounded, at the end the group presumably went on the attack, the video is shortened.

 
Footage of the attack of Russian modified FPV drones VT-40 Sudoplatov, controlled via fiber optic cable, on the Ukrainian IFV AIFV-B-C25. The AIFV-B-C25 infantry fighting vehicle is based on the M113A1 armored personnel carrier. The AIFV-B-C25 IFV was produced in Belgium, developed in 1979. One of the armament options of the AIFV-B-C25 IFV is a 25-mm Oerlikon KBA cannon paired with a 7.62-mm FN MAG machine gun. These IFVs were previously used by the Ukrainian 15th Mechanized Brigade "Steel Cordon". The Ukrainian IFVs were hidden in a hangar in the village of Kolodeznoye, in the Kupyansk direction. A Ukrainian armored car Roshel Senator was also stored there, they are produced in Canada. Judging by the video, all the equipment was destroyed by drones.

 
Ukrainian servicemen witnessed the impact of a Russian ODAB-500 bomb equipped with a UMPK module. The video is rare and archival, the location of the shooting is not reported, the bomb was presumably dropped by a Su-34NVO aircraft, the bomb exploded over the target. The ODAB-500 bomb was developed by GNPP Bazalt in the late 1980s, it contains ethylene oxide or piperylene, depending on the version. There are 4 versions of bombs in total: ODAB-500, ODAB-500P, ODAB-500PM and ODAB-500PMV. The damaging factor of the ODAB-500 bomb is a blast wave with a pressure of up to 120 atmospheres and thermal radiation of up to 2000 degrees, some call the bomb a vacuum bomb. The radius of destruction of the ODAB-500 bomb is from 30 to 300 meters, depending on the altitude of the explosion and the weather. The ODAB-500 bomb weighs 500 kg and can be equipped with a parachute. The bomb's TNT equivalent reaches one ton.

 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom