What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

lol you are funny.

The avant garde of the deepstate are the Trumpers and fellow partners - Putin and supporters. Wanting to burn down the globe for the Trump agenda, cia Pompeo agenda, and Putin agenda.

Trumpers and Putinites are fifth columnists for mi6 Brexit Tories and cia Pompeo Trump Russia Republican agenda against Europe.

The Real Deep State Is Trump​

How the president has used William Barr and other officials to turn the government into his personal fiefdom


And cia vetted Putin. And Farage. And Tucker is the deepstate. Once you know Trump is the cia Bush/Pompeo Republican deepstate, then you know buddy Putin is the deepstate, because cia deepstater Trump backs Putin. And you know Brexit was cia deepstate against the EU, because it was the first agenda of cia Republican Trump. The very morons "fighting the deepstate", are the deepstate. The Bush cia in 2008 with historic low approval ratings, decided the PNAC neocons to lead the popular resistance/tea party/patriots to be the new Republican party, as potential future replacements of the Christian zionists. The Christian zionists failed twice in 2008 and 2012; and neoconservatism became a failed ideology. The very same publications and media that promoted neoconservatism of the Bush cia are the very same media (Fox News, New York Post) that promote Trump and Putin, and yes, Bitcoin. When the main projects of the Bush cia have been Trump, cia vetted Putin, and bitcoin.
Called it again. The new neoconservative deepstate is trump, putin and bitcoin.


The same media of old that promoted the neocon agenda have embraced Trump and Bitcoin, along with promoting the defeat of Ukraine.

Bitcoin is gonna be the global money that is worth hundreds of millions of dollars per bitcoin. That is the deepstate agenda. To replace dollars, euros, yen and yuan with bitcoin. When gold and silver were the anti-dollar investment, the deepstate did as much market manipulation to suppress the price of gold and silver using banks:

Suppressing Silver Prices Has Been Official U.S. Policy Since 1965​


Now that the deepstate have their dollar replacement, bitcoin, to own the globe, it does not bother Washington if currencies collapse.
 
Last edited:
.
S300-400+ systems are static systems and can be targeted by all long range means after they are detected by satellites. Best strategy for evolution of these systems is decoupling the radar antenna and missile tubes which need to be exposed outside from the other parts like power-source, command control vehicle and all other radar electronics parts and station these inside a mountain complex or underground bunker network far away from the frontline. This way only the radar antenna or missile tubes which must be exposed outside would be destroyed and other parts-personnel will be secure inside the mountain bunkers.

Another last move by Zelensky and co. will possibly be get submarines and use them against Russian fleet. He was telling about getting submarines several weeks ago. Russia can buy midget submarines from North Korea. Also locally produce them like Geran drones. Station those submarines in Crimea. They can be targeted from above so entrance into the underground submarine hangar should be under the sea level. Iran also has midget submarine fleet and capabilities but "officially" North Korea can provide which is nuclear and other countries dont risk anything against NK as we see with their tactical ballistic missiles provided for Russia. It is better to provide technology to Russia to produce them like Geran drones or do partnerships with NK to make them build better midget submarines for Russia (disguised as space technology cooperation maybe). Odeassa can be kept in check when Russia controls Crimea this way. As well as these types of deals giving Russia the upper hand, zionist plan of reelecting trump after zionist previous election of democrats to initiate this current conflict and future Usa threatening against Russia to stay silent towards trump initiated military attacks against Iran or maybe China wont have much effect so they may need to change their plans.

 
Last edited:
.
There are also signs that a ceasefire deal is cooking up between Russia and Ukraine but in initial stages only. Ceasefire is the best option to end this conflict. It doesnt mean that final situation will be like this forever. Future governments of Ukraine and Russia can make new deals like Minsk 3 and some territories can be gained back by Ukraine after some time there is still possibility of this. Ukraines non-nato status and continuation of ceasefire will possibly make Russia take more flexible steps closer to the initial territorial agreement in Istanbul maybe after 5+ years.


North Kherson region is strategically not holdable by Russia as it is closer to Ukr supply lines and can be bombarded densely by Ukraine with Dnieper seperating from Russian areas and supplies. Ukraine military can retreat about 10kms from all frontline directions including Sumy,Kharkiv and these areas can be buffer zones for multinational ceasefire observers gathered by UN.

-Ukraine has many potential guarantors as we know. Russia can have Iran, China, North Korea as guarantors. If ceasefire is meaningfully breached (observers should be accurate some small amount of mortar-rocket fire by proxies does not count as well) by Ukraine guarantor countries will be free to supply equipment to Russia and vice versa.
-Countries can produce equipment by themselves. They should document what they purchase. If Ukraine buys atacms missiles for example Russia would be able to buy tactical bms from Iran with the same amount.
-There should be Ukraine F16 upper limit like 50 depending on the negotiations. If ceasefire is breached by Russia then Poland, Romania etc. can provide additional F16s to Ukraine.
-Ukraine nuclear non proliferation treaty is a must. Even if they get Zaporijia npp back(in possible future deals like Minsk 3) part of the inspectors should be Russian checking the activities.
-Ukraine non-nato status should be a must.


A stable ceasefire deal will work for everyones benefit except some power groups benefitting from this and future potential wars(trump biden it doesnt matter if the strings are the same acting them). Every party will claim a win as they gain advantage from it.
 
Last edited:
.

Russian motorcycle tactics are good. The bikers can escape from direct artillery hits by continious zig-zag maneuvring making the unguided artillery target calculation by Ukranian drones highly complicated and difficult.

However they are open to other forms of attack like fpv drones and anti-personnel artillery. An ap artillery shell can spread fragments even if it doesnt hit directly.

A lightly armored tricycle motorbike or a lightly armored quad atv will be more beneficial in future conflicts. AP artillery shell exploding nearby cannot penetrate the armor as well as a grenade dropped from fpv drone cannot penetrate the vehicle. High maneuvrability will make it zig zag and escape from direct artillery hits. It is too small for atgm hits. The difficulty would be make the armor hard enough to protect from anti personnel sharapnel fire but light enough to not to reduce maneuvrability of the vehicle. Fpv drone direct hits is still possible but maneuvrability, zig zag and speed changes would somewhat protect from direct hits. most fpv direct hits are from the back of the vehicle. A mesh cage behind the vehicle can protect as well.
 
.
Gps jamming is another field that has improved a lot in this conflict. Russia generally uses ground based high power gps jamming to spoof glsdb and similar threats. However air based jamming seems to be more effective.



As seen in 29:00 anti jam passive antennas block gps jamming signals below horizon and certain angles. These types of antennas are possibly used in gps guided bombs as well as atacms.

This anti-jam antenna of gps guided bombs-missiles can be defeated by high altitude balloons(or drones) transmitting fake gps jamming signals. As they are above the bomb falling down the antenna cannot distinguish between the fake gps satellite signals by using direction data. The higher the balloon fake-gps transmitter the better. However even 1-2 kms high tethered balloon would protect a very large radius from falling gps guided bombs underneath it.
 
.
Footage of a Russian Su-35 aircraft attacking, presumably with a Kh-35U missile, a Ukrainian ATCR-33S radar at an airfield near Kharkov. The Kh-35U missile has a range of up to 260 kilometers and has a 145-kilogram warhead, we previously wrote about them. The ATCR-33S radar was developed in Italy and is designed to control the air traffic of aircraft at a range of up to 83 km. The radar can be equipped with a G-33 parabolic antenna or an antenna with an ALE phased array. The radar's operating range is from 2700 to 2900 MHz, and its azimuth coverage is 360 degrees. As a result of the Kh-35U missile strike, the ATCR-33S radar was completely destroyed. The video also shows the impact of another Russian Kh-35U missile, near the Ukrainian Skala-M air defense radar; the radar was possibly hit by shrapnel.

 
.
The Russian Su-35S fighter jet shot down a Ukrainian MiG-29 for the first time with an R-37M missile at a colossal range of 213 km. This was reported by specialized Russian resources. It is worth noting that there are no photos or videos confirming this, in fact, it is impossible to confirm this, since the Ukrainian media do not publish footage of destroyed equipment. As reported, the Russian Su-35S fighter jet used ultra-long-range R-37M missiles, a link to a video about them is in the comments to the video. The MiG-29 was detected due to the fact that the Su-35S fighter jet is equipped with the N035 Irbis radar. The Irbis radar has a maximum peak power of up to 20 kW. Which allows it to detect targets at a range of up to 400 km. The MiG-29 has an RCS of approximately 5 m2, the N035 Irbis radar can detect an air target with an RCS of 3 m2 at a range of up to 400 km.

 
.
The Russian Su-35S fighter jet shot down a Ukrainian MiG-29 for the first time with an R-37M missile at a colossal range of 213 km. This was reported by specialized Russian resources. It is worth noting that there are no photos or videos confirming this, in fact, it is impossible to confirm this, since the Ukrainian media do not publish footage of destroyed equipment. As reported, the Russian Su-35S fighter jet used ultra-long-range R-37M missiles, a link to a video about them is in the comments to the video. The MiG-29 was detected due to the fact that the Su-35S fighter jet is equipped with the N035 Irbis radar. The Irbis radar has a maximum peak power of up to 20 kW. Which allows it to detect targets at a range of up to 400 km. The MiG-29 has an RCS of approximately 5 m2, the N035 Irbis radar can detect an air target with an RCS of 3 m2 at a range of up to 400 km.

Honestly it would be impossible to confirm from Russia's viewpoint
 
.
The Russian army has started using new ammunition for FPV drones in Ukraine. They can be called new conditionally, since they are homemade and created from sections of a hose with a powder charge used in the UR-77 "Meteorite" mine clearing units, also known as the "Snake Gorynych". Details in the video.

 
.
The strikes of kamikaze drones "Lancet" in Ukraine are shown quite often. The operators use the Russian kamikaze drone "Lancet-52", officially called "Product 52", this is the first, junior version of the drone that appeared in the Russian troops. Now kamikaze drones "Lancet-52" are able to independently target the target at the final stage of the flight, at the moment the drones "Lancet" are invulnerable to electronic warfare, there are no cases of their interception. Details of the use of drones "Lancet" in Ukraine in the video.

 
.
There are news that F16s are now actively being used by Ukraine. Plans seemingly changed to a2a option for F16s against SU34-35s on eastern part. Su-35s are equipped with
ground attack glide fab bombs. Their air to air configuration is low. Also F-16s are rumored to be equipped with high end classified ecm pods to give advantage to make hit-run attacks against Su-34s.

The weak spot in Ukraine approach is they have low numbers of F16s and even if they have they would be risking too much if they make a dense assault from the air. Also since they dont have awacs they need to be qued by ground radars to send F16s. Su-35s can fly low in their initial flight profile and then fly high and make the attacks. So ground radars cant catch them in time and vector the F16s. Another option is Mig21s and some older Russian jets can be converted to drones and can escort the Sukhois. F16s can be shooting fake low cost targets and they would be revealing their positions as well.

Another thing is I know it is a military operation, a kind of war but if objectives can be achieved by destroying equipment and destroying command centers then it is much better than destroying Ukraines manpower. For example if fab250-500 is used against artillery positions, hqs, ammo depots, supply lines which have much more range than fab-1500 fab-3000 or Tos-1-2 then Ukraine soldiers will possibly surrender. More Fab-250s can be carried by Sukhois in that case as well. Also having that option and not using it going for the alternative will give a better pr image and more revolts against govt inside Ukraine. The more soldiers are killed the easier it gets for Ukraine to recruit more soldiers who have anger against Russia like relatives etc. After the war ends also the public will not forget this type of choice. Fab-1500 3000 and Tos 1 2 is good for area denial like in Kursk area Ukraine forces entered and advancing. They can be massively used in that area. Ofcourse the lives of the soldiers are at stake so heavier equipment is used but depending on the risk analysis if same results can be obtained with much less by focusing on equpment hqs and ammo depots it is much better. Remote mining of Ukraine supply lines is also possible by Fab-3000 type of bomb if it can be converted to a remote mining bomb.
 
.
Footage of a strike by a Russian Iskander 9M723-K5 missile with a cluster warhead on a Ukrainian Buk-M1 air defense system in the Sumy region of Ukraine. The Buk-M1 air defense system was covering the entry of a Ukrainian armored group into the territory of the Kursk region of Russia. The first strike by an Iskander missile did not destroy the Buk-M1 air defense system, but the missiles launched spontaneously in the system. After the abnormal launch of the missiles, the crew of the Buk-M1 air defense system decided to hide in the forest. The start of the Buk-M1 air defense system movement can be seen after the spontaneous launch of the second missile. The movement of the air defense system was tracked by a Russian drone, after which a second strike was carried out at the location of the Ukrainian Buk-M1 air defense system, but with an Iskander missile with a conventional warhead. As a result of the strike by the Iskander missile, the Buk-M1 air defense system was destroyed.

 
.
The main Ukr attempt in Kursk other than gaining foothold and hostages is if possible to approach and gain control of nuclear power site in Kursk. There are two concerns for Russia to defend that area. Shortage of manpower because of other fronts and shortage of equipment mainly drones.

-shortage of manpower mainly is tried to be fixed by transfer of ex wagner troops. Another option is to get soldiers from abroad especially to fortify and defend the proximity of nuclear installation. Syria for example can send unofficially trained soldiers by civilian planes. Iraqi Syrian resistance fighters can also be sent. Ukraine does not have much artillery support there in Kursk yet but fpv drones. Nuclear site is a large closed area that can be defended easily similar to avdievka plant.

-shortage of equipment. Mainly drones. Russia needs more Mohajeer 6 type of drones if possible armed. They can be transferred unofficially like transfer overhaul of some older S300 parts to Russia from Iran. Iranian older S300 Modernisation project for example can be a good disguise to transfer drones to Russia.Ukraine also does not have much ad there to take down drones flying higher than manpads.

This will also stop turning the conflict into a nuclear one. As I have said before Usa is strong but strong doesnt mean the things-offers made by democrats are true but much more possibly to play and gain time for trump election victory. Security agreements between allied countries is very necessary in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
.
Tactics of the Ukrainian army in the Kursk region of Russia. Mikhail Zvinchuk, the author of the project "Rybar", published a video of the tactics of the Ukrainian army in the Kursk region of Russia. According to him, Ukrainian troops entered in small groups of three to six armored vehicles. Tactics of action, a third of the group pins down a Russian stronghold, others bypass it, entering nearby settlements and organizing ambushes on the roads, mining them.
Russian reinforcements are attacked, after which the Ukrainian group leaves the village. Thus, it seems that many villages are controlled by the Ukrainian army. Which can lead to panic and misinterpretation of the military situation on the ground.
Let me remind you that the Ukrainian army, numbering up to a thousand people, attacked the border area of the Kursk region of Russia on August 6 at 5:30 am. Military operations in the Kursk region continue, the Russian army is pulling in reserves.

 
.
The Ukrainian army has published footage of the entry of military units into the Kursk region of Russia on August 6. The video shows a battle with a Russian stronghold and shows destroyed Ukrainian equipment and a military medical service vehicle. The Ukrainian army is bringing up reserves, and the Russian army is doing the same. In the video, you can also see the evacuation of a Ukrainian VAB armored personnel carrier in the Kursk region and the evacuation of an International Maxxpro armored vehicle by an M88A2 Hercules repair and recovery vehicle. In some cases, the evacuation is carried out without hindrance. The Ukrainian army has begun to dig in in the Kursk region and is bringing up heavy equipment. According to experts, if the situation does not change within a week, the fighting will turn into a positional war and will drag on for a long time. Against this background, rumors have emerged about the need for a new wave of mobilization in Russia, officials deny its necessity. But according to experts, the 1,500 km long front line, the entry of Ukrainian troops into the Kursk region and the threat to the Bryansk region indicate that there is a shortage of 700,000 personnel, especially units with drones.

 
.
Back
Top Bottom