What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

~


Ukrainian SeaBaby drone hits Russian Samum missile warship in Black Sea



Details: The sources said the SSU's SeaBaby USV hit the Samum near the entry to Sevastopol Bay.


The USV hit the rear right side of the vessel, causing significant damage, which resulted in the ship losing power.

The sources stated that the Russians had to tow the Samum away for repairs "with a significant tilt at the stern and listing to starboard".




1b1493f579193616ed9dace5f6cfcf0b




SeaBaby drone :




~
 
Last edited:
Russia has attacked healthcare infrastructure and children at a rate of a hundred times that of USA in afghanistan.

During Nato control, life expectancy and education greatly improved for the afghan population.


Yet here you are…defending Russian atrocities while critisizing America.
Are you just that much of a hypocrite?
Or is it “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” and you view ukranian lives as stepping on ants?
So your saying US made up figures about life expectancy in taliban ruled afghanistan then added a few numbers after the US bombed and killed hundreds of thousands so it made them look good?

In a war between US/Muslim countries, taking data from US about Muslim countries is straight up retarded

Irrelevant, because the United States had the legal right to fight a War of Self-Defense since September 1998.
Mullah Omar was too stupid to understand legal matters.
So why didn't US invade Pakistan since Pakistan was harbouring Bin Laden and Taliban ?

Oh wait because Pakistan can actually hurt America with their nukes and America only invades countries that can't fight back

You are allowed to attack an ally which actively supports acts of war against you.
So China can attack and annex India because they harbour Dalai Lama who killed hundreds of thousands of Tibetans and put the rest in slave caste?
So Turkey can attack America for harbouring and protecting Kurdish militants?
And 1000x more examples if required too
 
Last edited:
So why didn't US invade Pakistan since Pakistan was harbouring Bin Laden and Taliban ?

harbouring definition ; to shelter or hide (a criminal or wanted person).

e.g : "he was suspected of harboring an escaped prisoner"


Do you have anything to suggest that is what Pakistan was doing ?


~
 
So your saying US made up figures about life expectancy in taliban ruled afghanistan then added a few numbers after the US bombed and killed hundreds of thousands so it made them look good?

In a war between US/Muslim countries, taking data from US about Muslim countries is straight up retarded


So why didn't US invade Pakistan since Pakistan was harbouring Bin Laden and Taliban ?

Oh wait because Pakistan can actually hurt America with their nukes and America only invades countries that can't fight back


So China can attack and annex India because they harbour Dalai Lama who killed hundreds of thousands of Tibetans and put the rest in slave caste?
So Turkey can attack America for harbouring and protecting Kurdish militants?
And 1000x more examples if required too

If someone is idiot enough to believe Bin Laden has something to do with 911 attacks, then they believe any another other stupid thing from his authority.

"If you believe that their real intention is to kill you, it isn't unreasonable to believe that they would lie to you" -Henry Kissinger

Afghanistan war was just a way to train troops killing real people and keep USA world leadership making all vassals repeat the lie of 911 [self]attacks, even Russia repeated the stupid lie, USA world power in 2001 was absolute.

But now there is China, hehehe.
 
So your saying US made up figures about life expectancy in taliban ruled afghanistan then added a few numbers after the US bombed and killed hundreds of thousands so it made them look good?
It is estimated that the US killed around 10,000 civilians and the Afghanis, mostly Taliban. killed 45,000 civilians.
Around 50,000 Taliban were killed as well. You ”hundreds of thousands” are pure fantasy.
In a war between US/Muslim countries, taking data from US about Muslim countries is straight up retarded


So why didn't US invade Pakistan since Pakistan was harbouring Bin Laden and Taliban ?

Oh wait because Pakistan can actually hurt America with their nukes and America only invades countries that can't fight back

Because Musharraf ran a war game and realized it was a better idea to pretend to be an ally.

So China can attack and annex India because they harbour Dalai Lama who killed hundreds of thousands of Tibetans and put the rest in slave caste?
So Turkey can attack America for harbouring and protecting Kurdish militants?
And 1000x more examples if required too
Chinas illegal occupation of Tibet does not give it any rights.
Are Kurdish militants running training camps in the US to attack Turkey?

Laws of War/neutrality are covering combatants. Anyone reverting to civilian life is no longer a combatant. Neutral states are not required to intern civilians to maintain neutrality.
 
Repaired like the Moskva :whistle:
Assessment seen by the satellite, the ships are damaged beyond repair. That’s almost impossible to repair or would take months. Without the landing ship and the Kilo sub, Russia navy in the region is finished. Putin has ordered the rest of Russia Black Sea fleet be evacuated to eastern sea port of Russia mainland.

Turkey will not allow Russia to send new ships via Bosporus.
 
So your saying US made up figures about life expectancy in taliban ruled afghanistan then added a few numbers after the US bombed and killed hundreds of thousands so it made them look good?

In a war between US/Muslim countries, taking data from US about Muslim countries is straight up retarded

I am talking about sources like the UN and WHO you fool.

Where are you getting your sources from, the madrassah friday afternoon sermon?
 

Basically,Russia tried to find a peaceful solution with NATO initially,but the Westerners insisted on this war. They insisted on expanding NATO and surrounding Russia with allied countries. They provoked the war. Was the invasion of Ukraine a good move? No. They could have achieved what they wanted with other means,perhaps. But the arrogance of a Freemasonry-led Western leadership wanted war. They wanted war. And Putin just fell for their trap. Although who will prevail in the end,we will see. I'm afraid it might turn into a nuclear war. Russia and Westerners cannot trust each other anymore.

The ones on the West kept pushing and pushing and the ones on the East couldn't find a good solution to make their people happy (the ex-USSR countries).
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom