Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tanks on border , i rather they deployed enough man beside them , those tanks will have hard time countering lancet and atgmsThe wagners zombies are dangerous. They are much like fanatics islamic suicide bombers. It’s good move Poland deploys tanks to the border. Putin is a psychopath. He looks ways to widen the war on global scale.
you probably don't want to deploy lancet and atgm when Poland and NATO probably would have undisputed air superiority....ergo, you are going to get butt raped by gunship and mover if you deploy anthing that closetanks on border , i rather they deployed enough man beside them , those tanks will have hard time countering lancet and atgms
if you want deploy an organized army there . do you consider Wagner an organized army ?you probably don't want to deploy lancet and atgm when Poland and NATO probably would have undisputed air superiority....ergo, you are going to get butt raped by gunship and mover if you deploy anthing that close
if you want deploy an organized army there . do you consider Wagner an organized army ?
i wonder won't they adopt a strategy of attack and scatter there , more like harassing Poland army than confronting it
wasn't there some complaint of them infiltrating inside Poland ? and lancet and ATGMs can be fired by small disguised team
that is debatable . the atgm is fired in one or two second the f-16 is not always there , the Apachee can be interesting target for man pads and the lancet can be controlled from anywhere not necessarily from where it launched and the launch itself hardly can be noticed by anythingCan you outrun an Apache or F-16? Because once you launch those platform inside Poland, they will pick up a green trail on those platform and they can deploy those asset faster than you can say "oh shoot"
The Apache is even a target for the Lancet itself, if it is on the ground or flying slow and in a predictable manner. The same story with Ka-52, some got downed by Ukrop ATGM, because they flew slow and at low altitude.that is debatable . the atgm is fired in one or two second the f-16 is not always there , the Apachee can be interesting target for man pads and the lancet can be controlled from anywhere not necessarily from where it launched and the launch itself hardly can be noticed by anything
you are welcome try to locate the launch site like missile launch
actually a small group can easily smuggle those on foot , its not convenient way to use them but it can be done
There is a reason russia has not harmed an inch of polish land despite it being a logistical and transport hub for ukraine.that is debatable . the atgm is fired in one or two second the f-16 is not always there , the Apachee can be interesting target for man pads and the lancet can be controlled from anywhere not necessarily from where it launched and the launch itself hardly can be noticed by anything
you are welcome try to locate the launch site like missile launch
actually a small group can easily smuggle those on foot , its not convenient way to use them but it can be done
Russia NEVER gave nukes to Belarussia. You Nato NPC can't even get the simplest facts straight. These nukes are based in Belarussia, but all of them are fully under the control of the Russian Armed Forces. No Belarussian Soldier has access to them and especially not to the codes arming the implosion charge in the correct symmetrical way.There is a reason Russia gave nukes to Belarussia.
Putin can claim Wagner is illegal group who has no tie with Russia . after all they attempted a coupe and they get exiled .There is a reason russia has not harmed an inch of polish land despite it being a logistical and transport hub for ukraine.
There is a reason Russia gave nukes to Belarussia.
This is all hot air.
I actually hope Wagner/Putin is stupid enough to try something as it gives poland an excuse to do the same with irregular group or “the new belarussian liberation front”.
Well ofcourse not 100%. But would be nice if they give more then the half-1 percent they currently give.What do you really expect?
USA sends 6500 out of 6500 Bradley? Then itself will remain unarmed with that vast lands that they have.
So far this conflict is indeed in US benefit.Moreover, USA has always acted smartly. They throw their European dogs under the bus. They can easily manipulate Europeans and turn them against each other. Their soldiers raped French women while supposed to be allies with French LMAO. From their pov, there is no difference between French or Ukrainian cannon fodders just like the WW2 Europeans will kill one an other and at the last moment when they are all on their knees USA will appear to save them (read occupy them).
EU is no more than a biting dog for American thinktanks.
What do you really expect?
USA sends 6500 out of 6500 Bradley? Then itself will remain unarmed with that vast lands that they have.
Moreover, USA has always acted smartly. They throw their European dogs under the bus. They can easily manipulate Europeans and turn them against each other. Their soldiers raped French women while supposed to be allies with French LMAO. From their pov, there is no difference between French or Ukrainian cannon fodders just like the WW2 Europeans will kill one an other and at the last moment when they are all on their knees USA will appear to save them (read occupy them).
EU is no more than a biting dog for American thinktanks.