Deino
INT'L MOD
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2014
- Messages
- 12,780
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
Well, the Russians always in good faith to their own ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, the Russians always in good faith to their own ...
I am not surprised. Usually, having a career in the military is less attractive to the folks living in more developed areas where other opportunities are more abundant. It is even more pronounced among foot soldiers as officers are more likely to be from the more developed areas. This is a pattern everywhere including China. If China ever goes into a war, the proportion of resulting casualty will certainly be higher in the less developed areas than the more developed areas.Well, the Russians always in good faith to their own ...
1 or 2 confirmed T-90 losses..50 is not much. But I agree they may also not have trained crews for sophisticated tanks.
You either see wrong, or you simply just buy into Russian perspective.
From what I have seen when i was living over there early 2010s, and the people I know, there were never large enough of population in the occupation region (Crimea, Donbas) are ethnic Russian, bear in mind the term "Ethnic" Russia is people who of Russian root, themselves born or have generation of family member living in Russia. Those are about 20-25% in the East, less than 10% in the West.
Russia counted Russian Speaking Ukrainian as "Ethnic" Russian, if that is the case, then even Zelenskyy himself could be and should be considered as Ethic Russian. Because he was brough up in Kryvyi Riv, which is a Russian Speaking part of Ukraine.
It's different between Russian Speaking Ukrainian and Ethnic Russian Ukrainian. The first one identify themselves as Ukrainian, they may or may not sympathizes with Russian position (I personally know a dozen of them in Kharkiv who condemn Maidan) and I even show a post from my Facebook feed from one of the most Pro-Russian Ukrainian I know who was actually born in Transnistria
Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments
Why would China support the west when they west is constantly sabatoging, demonizing and vilifying China on a daily basis? Do you think China exists in a vacuum, totally unaware of which countries are trying to hurt it and which countries bankroll billions to create a regime of fake news to...defence.pk
She supports annexation of Crimea, she denounced Maidan, and she ran back to Transnistria when the war started (her own word) which is another enclave for Pro-Russian movement in Moldova and she sign off that Facebook post with #FuckyouRussianWarship (the message those snake island defender send to Moskva) and you know she is typing Russian because she uses 24 февраля instead of 24 лютого
it's one thing you think you are pro-Russia, it's another when Russian bomb just destroyed your home and killed your dog.
I mean, i have no trouble for you or anyone to be pro-Russia, but don't buy into stuff that you never understand, it's a lot more complicated than your think, it's not just "These people are Pro-Russia" and Russia is legit to use force to recapture those places.
I see you have bought the russian narrative, eventhough you somehow pretend to be objective, it is still obvious.
You do realize that many people from Kherson to Kharkiv can speak Russian right? Even Zelensky? Thats the worse excuse to claim that they wanted to be liberated. Considering how the people of Kherson were celebrating with the Ukrainian troops en masse compared to Russians being there. As you said, the Russians failed to win over the Ukrainians. Just remember, the Afghans beat the Soviets when they lost millions of Afghans and the Russians controlled most of the country.
You don't see that kind of welcome for the Russian troops.
AFP is biased, so the chance this map is accurate is 0%. Keep feeeding your confirmation bias-supporting habit!!View attachment 918048
Outside of a few kms in Bakhmut, the frontline has been stable since Kherson was liberated.
then what? more rubbish opinions? lmao.I state that if China ships weapons…
Neither is the neutrality of NATO and US- caught with their "hands in the cookie jar"..in 3D too.The neutrality of Iran in the war is not governed by what is proved on PDF or not.
they make decisions and take actions, but they are usually not potent enough for a beast like Iran.The West has plenty of intelligence sources and will make decisions based on those sources.
they already doIf they have reliable intelligence that Iran is supplying weapons,
like what? order Kurds to fire 3 pathetic small drones within Iran to hit factories in Isfahan?they can take action,
it was illegal, and they still did it, but Iran brushed it off like some dirt off its jay-z shoulder.and since that will be part of a war of self-defense, it will be legal.
irrelevant blabbling but you again.The UN charters puts limits on acts of war.
when US does it its not and when others like China do it its wrong right?Sanctions may or may not be acts of war.
more irrelevant blabbing.Sanctions which are not acts of war, are not the business of the UNSC.
irrelevant blabbing.Sanctions which are acts of war are legal, as long as they are part of a war of self defense - until the UNSC comes up with solution to the problem.
so do you.As usual, you make claims and without any sources.
stop distracting from the fact that US and NATO cant take any serious action on Iran now- for one not whjen they are low on ammunition, but mainly because they lack the soldier ratio to take serious military action against Iran- with over 400K ground forces available in the middle east, US and NATO would need at least 1 million soldiers for an Iran military contingency, (and that would be a 2:1 ratio too, which is horrible),but US doesnt even have 100K soldiers in the middle east right now, and probably no aircraft carrier (other than the 1 that goes close to PG when there is hot tension with Iran, but runs 800miles away when weapons are turned on).State which clause in which law/treaty says that sanctions must come from the UNSC.