Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[kingQamaR]

M

The possibility Putin resorts to Nuke is 50 percent. The only thing that can prevent him of using nukes are potential negative reactions of the US, West, NATO, China, India, Pakistan, NK and other when using nukes. Conventionally Russia already loses the war. Putin can avoid the immediate defeat by sacrificing more hundreds thousands of Russians. But he can’t avoid the defeat eventually.

The US, NATO have plans to respond to Soviet’s Nukes. They will use the same plans to respond to Russia nukes.

The US not committed to not using nuclear weapons in a first strike . Russia along with most countries have agreed to ONLY use nuclear weapons in defensive use!!! So this is only fantasy !!!

 

[Dalit]

It is a shame that a world leader is lying to his people like that.

Two million people are freezing in the cold right now cause this man wanted to play Napoleon.

~

Don't be so sour.

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1628036421209542657

 

[kingQamaR]

To level he gives up or uses nukes.
One would ask why would he use nukes?
Well why wouldn't he?
Ukriane doesn't has nukes
Unless Ukriane procures nuclear weapons nukes are on the table

If ukriane joins NATO or procures nukes then may be not

Very optimistic, if a nuclear war break out not only Europe will be destroyed but the whole world as we know it will come to an end . It’s incredible as this kind of dramatic propaganda try to look catastrophic but instead they clearly undervaluate the risks an consequences of a nuclear war….

 

[Viet]

M


The US not committed to not using nuclear weapons in a first strike . Russia along with most countries have agreed to ONLY use nuclear weapons in defensive use!!! So this is only fantasy !!!

Russia has changed the nuclear doctrine.
It’s now only the president of Russia or in the person of Putin to decide use or not use nuclear weapons. If he believes the country is under attack, or in danger, or at stake, then he will order the nuclear strike. No matter if the imaginary enemy is a nuclear armed country or not. Russia nuclear strike doctrine does not differentiate the nuance.

Putin today’s nation address says the war in Ukraine is about Russia’s survival.

 

[ziaulislam]

The possibility Putin resorts to Nuke is 50 percent. The only thing that can prevent him of using nukes are potential negative reactions of the US, West, NATO, China, India, Pakistan, NK and other when using nukes. Conventionally Russia already loses the war. Putin can avoid the immediate defeat by sacrificing more hundreds thousands of Russians. But he can’t avoid the defeat eventually.

The US, NATO have plans to respond to Soviet’s Nukes. They will use the same plans to respond to Russia nukes.

What negative reaction?
Russia is already under all and any sanctions imaginable

Only a military response is what can deter him but what military response. A conventional or non conventional response will lead to Russian reaction on Europe be it nuclear or not.

Remember Russia thinks of ukriane people as its own so it won't nuke it unless it's surely losing


Basically Europe USA doesn't care what happens to ukriane and neither does zelenasky

Very optimistic, if a nuclear war break out not only Europe will be destroyed but the whole world as we know it will come to an end . It’s incredible as this kind of dramatic propaganda try to look catastrophic but instead they clearly undervaluate the risks an consequences of a nuclear war….

That's a pessimistic view which will lead us to a nuclear war.

You are right if we are talking about two nuclear powers but that's not the case.

This is more a Japan USA 1940s situation

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1628031100751691776

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1627962419459883010

 

[kingQamaR]

Russia has changed the nuclear doctrine.
It’s now only the president of Russia or in the person of Putin to decide use or not use nuclear weapons. If he believes the country is under attack, or in danger, or at stake, then he will order the nuclear strike. No matter if the imaginary enemy is a nuclear armed country or not. Russia nuclear strike doctrine does not differentiate the nuance.

Putin today’s nation address says the war in Ukraine is about Russia’s survival.

What is the use of having nukes u can’t use them Putin he knows what will happen if he tries that sh*t

 

[Viet]

What negative reaction?
Russia is already under all and any sanctions imaginable

Only a military response is what can deter him but what military response. A conventional or non conventional response will lead to Russian reaction on Europe be it nuclear or not.

Remember Russia thinks of ukriane people as its own so it won't nuke it unless it's surely losing


Basically Europe USA doesn't care what happens to ukriane and neither does zelenasky


That's a pessimistic view which will lead us to a nuclear war.

You are right if we are talking about two nuclear powers but that's not the case.

This is more a Japan USA 1940s situation

Negative reactions means negative for Russia. About nukes, ah come, let’s wait if Putin will do it. China has nukes while in Vietnam we haven’t. How will we respond if Xi jinping drops nukes? I don’t know.
The US has told Putin how the US and NATO respond if Russia drops nukes in Ukraine.

 

[kingQamaR]

What negative reaction?
Russia is already under all and any sanctions imaginable

Only a military response is what can deter him but what military response. A conventional or non conventional response will lead to Russian reaction on Europe be it nuclear or not.

Remember Russia thinks of ukriane people as its own so it won't nuke it unless it's surely losing


Basically Europe USA doesn't care what happens to ukriane and neither does zelenasky


That's a pessimistic view which will lead us to a nuclear war.

You are right if we are talking about two nuclear powers but that's not the case.

This is more a Japan USA 1940s situation

There are an incredible spectrum of possible scenarios that could play out. Some are likely some are not. The one I said is firmly in the latter category.

Once the Nukes start flying , they will all fly . it’s MAD

 

[Clutch]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1627962419459883010

Which is made in China.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Ok, so you finally admitted that your initial claim was false.

the initial claim was the same as it was already , european built a factory to build chemical weapon for iraq , gave them the precoursor for running the factory and hide the manifest while pretty well knew what iraq is doing

nd now comes another claim without facts.
You have not proven that Iraq got instructions how to create Mustard gas from anyone. This is old technology. You can probably download this on internet.

you literally built the factory fore them

You should not have brought up the issue in thread in the first place.

but i didn't brought it up first , the issue brought up by you and another guy here , just go back in chain of the posts and you 'll see

You forget mentioning that people were prosecuted and convicted for violating export restrictions.

just 3 people and I'm sure they later pardoned , just like American soldiers for killing and raping Iraq citizen , they always get acquitted in USA court , the only time they sentenced in a USA court every one acquitted just one sentenced and the guy released in less than 1 year because he just raped and then killed a family of Iraqi.
people..

A ”Dutch Official” is not ”Europe” and official can also break the law.
And hiding a manifest of what? Ethylene, Chlorine, whatever?
Just claims - no facts.

Dutch government is

Can you explain why Denmark is responsible for someone in Netherlands violating the law? Why would they know about it in the first place.

The UK banks financed a factory to build Chlorine, not Mustard gas.
Just claims - no facts.

while uk government knew iraq is using mustard gas and every one knew why iraq want that factory , by the way who care about denmark when , british , france germany , dutch, and .....were in it

 

[F-22Raptor]

Which is made in China.

Assembled

 

[Clutch]

Assembled

No, .....components are also mostly Chinese, Taiwan, Malaysia, Thailand, and South Korea. It's a global value chain.