What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

The unintended consequence as the construction of LNG facilities in US (plants and ship terminals) has made the US largest LNG exporter (emphasis is on liquid). Rapid construction in Europe has made it possible to utilize this.

Its still not cheap but its there. A friend recently came back from Copenhagen and people are sitting out in bars and restaurants with heated lamps. That is pure stupidity and waste but it shows that they can afford it and hasn't hit the people hard enough to adjust their social habits.

Remains to be seen if putting oil cap strategy in Dec is going to help anybody or have the oppsite consequence.


The United States became the world’s largest LNG exporter in the first half of 2022

Monthly U.S. liquefied natural gas exports (Jan 2016�&Jun 2022)

Data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Liquefaction Capacity Table, and U.S. Department of Energy LNG reports
Note: June 2022 LNG exports are EIA estimates based on tanker shipping data. LNG export capacity is an estimated peak LNG production capacity of all operational U.S. LNG export facilities.

Reposted July 26 to correct footnotes and minor text edits.
The United States became the world’s largest liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporter during the first half of 2022, according to data from CEDIGAZ. Compared with the second half of 2021, U.S. LNG exports increased by 12% in the first half of 2022, averaging 11.2 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d). U.S. LNG exports continued to grow for three reasons—increased LNG export capacity, increased international natural gas and LNG prices, and increased global demand, particularly in Europe.


According to our estimates, installed U.S. LNG export capacity has expanded by 1.9 Bcf/d nominal (2.1 Bcf/d peak) since November 2021. The capacity additions included a sixth train at the Sabine Pass LNG, 18 new mid-scale liquefaction trains at the Calcasieu Pass LNG, and increased LNG production capacity at Sabine Pass and Corpus Christi LNG facilities. As of July 2022, we estimate that U.S. LNG liquefaction capacity averaged 11.4 Bcf/d, with a shorter-term peak capacity of 13.9 Bcf/d.


International natural gas and LNG prices hit record highs in the last quarter of 2021 and first half of 2022. Prices at the Title Transfer Facility (TTF) in the Netherlands have been trading at record highs since October 2021. TTF averaged $30.94 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) during the first half of 2022. LNG spot prices in Asia have also been high, averaging $29.50/MMBtu during the same period.


Since the end of last year, countries in Europe have increasingly imported more LNG to compensate for lower pipeline imports from Russia and to fill historically low natural gas storage inventories. LNG imports in the EU and UK increased by 63% during the first half of 2022 to average 14.8 Bcf/d.

Most U.S. LNG exports went to the EU and the UK during the first five months of this year, accounting for 64%, or 7.3 Bcf/d, of the total U.S. LNG exports. Similar to 2021, the United States sent the most LNG to the EU and UK during the first half of the year, providing 47% of the 14.8 Bcf/d of Europe's total LNG imports, followed by Qatar at 15%, Russia at 14%, and four African countries combined at 17%.


In June, the United States exported 11% less LNG than the 11.4 Bcf/d average exports during the first five months of 2022, mainly as a result of an unplanned outage at the Freeport LNG export facility. Freeport LNG is expected to resume partial liquefaction operations in early October 2022.


Utilization of the peak capacity at the seven U.S. LNG export facilities averaged 87% during the first half of 2022, mainly before the Freeport LNG outage, which is similar to the utilization on average during 2021.

Daily U.S. LNG export capacity (peak) utilization (Jan 2017�&Jun 2022)

Data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Liquefaction Capacity Table, and U.S. Department of Energy LNG reports
Note: Daily utilization of U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) export capacity is calculated as a 30-day moving average.


Principal contributor: Victoria Zaretskaya
 
.
Last edited:
. .
.
The
Ukrainians have been owned in these battles. They were suicidal to attack a well-prepared defensive position of the LPR (Luhansk People's Republic). As a result, the attacking Ukrainian forces were wiped out.





I said wiped out!
sad loss of life.

However you do realize that “friendly brothers of the russian world” just drove towards trenches in apc and civilian cars, crawled closer under mortar and artillery fire…then to trench fighting (part 4) despite heavy fire and losses?

That is how strong their motivation to fight against the russian invaders is.
 
.
They recive Gepard, recovery tanks, bridge layer tanks... and most of the T-72 Ukraine recive are a circle deal with Germany were the donating country recive Leo2 for their T-72 given to Ukraine(same with BMP1 Marder ring exchange)... problem is...the Ukraine armed forces know the T- series tanks very well... would take a long time of training to adop a new tank which opens up completely new tactical possebilitys ... the Leo2 opens up completely new options the T-64, T-84, T-72 or T-80 can not deliver ... the next problem is logistic.... different ammunition for the main gun... and maintenance and repair.

BTW why people only tell Germany to send Leo 2... no one ask USA to send M1, UK to send CR2, France to send Leclerc or Italy to send Ariete
Ukraine has the support by 50 nation contact group. I am pretty sure Ukraine asks every country for tanks. It’s just Germany has the most lethal tanks, Ukraine likes them first and foremost.
 
. . . . . . .
You do not watch Fox News in Sweden, and CNN, while available, is a very small contributor.
The US destroyed the illegal Baath regime.

This is not the figures of a destroyed state.
View attachment 899537
Or this.
View attachment 899538

so please show statistics that prove Iraq is a destroyed state.

I actually followed the takeover of the Taliban on the news, and they were trained, funded and armed by Pakistan. That something the Pakistani government has claimed as well. The takeover happened years after the US left the area.
A lot of PDF members make the outrageous claim that because the US funded the Mujahedin, they are responsible for the Taliban. This is like blaming a car instructor if one of his pupils drives into a crowd. The Taliban ran training camps inside Pakistan.
Trying to be more pro American than Americans themselves? Even Americans are ashamed of fake wars yet there are diehard dummies brainwashed by CNN who keep repeating their lies.


You are trying to manipulate your own graph. Who brought down the Iraqi GDP in the first place? Those were the most murderous sanctions anywhere in the world. If the sanctions are lifted then GDP will grow. Nothing to brag about there.
Why don't you apply the same GDP growth model to your own country to bring more progress?

USA destroyed "illegal" baath regime. Who helped them into power in the first place?

You know everything about taliban because you "followed the takeover of taliban". Time to change your channel.


Why would taliban need weapons and money from Pakistan?
- Billion + dollars of USA aid to Afghan puppet regime went to Taliban.
- Afghan puppet army sold their weapons to taliban.
- Under USA occupation, poppy trade grew bringing more cash for taliban.
- CIA organized weapons from all over the world for taliban worht billions of dollars.
- Russia left a huge weapons dump in Afghanistan.
- Afghan puppet government + US military paid protection money to taliban. Instead of fighting they found it much easier to pay to maintain peace.
- taliban collected taxes from all over Afghanistan under USA occupation.

+ Saudi money:

In this situation they could supply weapons and money to Pakistan and still be rich and armed.
 
Last edited:
.
Anyway such an invasion is very unlikely, Russia has a hard enough time with Ukraine for them (Putin) to start another foolish/very costly invasion elsewhere.
I think invasion of Kazakhstan is almost a certainty. Kazakhs stand no chance of defending themselves.
Ukrainians have been owned in these battles. They were suicidal to attack a well-prepared defensive position of the LPR (Luhansk People's Republic). As a result, the attacking Ukrainian forces were wiped out.





I said wiped out!
I see about 12 Ukranian casualties in all those videos. Most of them are similar to Armenian videos, where they show a close up of enemy soldiers and then they show unrelated explosions in other places.

Ukranian and Azeri videos, you actually see the other side blown away. Just something ive noticed.
 
.
Trying to be more pro American than Americans themselves? Even Americans are ashamed of fake wars yet there are diehard dummies brainwashed by CNN who keep repeating their lies.


You are trying to manipulate your own graph. Who brought down the Iraqi GDP in the first place? Those were the most murderous sanctions anywhere in the world. If the sanctions are lifted then GDP will grow. Nothing to brag about there.
Why don't you apply the same GDP growth model to your own country to bring more progress?

USA destroyed "illegal" baath regime. Who helped them into power in the first place?

You know everything about taliban because you "followed the takeover of taliban". Time to change your channel.


Why would taliban need weapons and money from Pakistan?
- Billion + dollars of USA aid to Afghan puppet regime went to Taliban.
- Afghan puppet army sold their weapons to taliban.
- Under USA occupation, poppy trade grew bringing more cash for taliban.
- CIA organized weapons from all over the world for taliban worht billions of dollars.
- Russia left a huge weapons dump in Afghanistan.
- Afghan puppet government + US military paid protection money to taliban. Instead of fighting they found it much easier to pay to maintain peace.
- taliban collected taxes from all over Afghanistan under USA occupation.

+ Saudi money:

In this situation they could supply weapons and money to Pakistan and still be rich and armed.
CNN is actually anti-Iraqi war......as they were left leaning.


And CNN is known to hire Middle Eastern Activists such as Octavia Nasr, which ironically was fired by CNN for her supportive message on Hezbollah leader using CNN blog after public pressure, similar to what Chris Cuomo went thru last year before the cut.


On the other hand, both CNN and Fox are actually fringe media, they don't have that big of a following and both were not considered mainstream in the US.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom