What's new

Russia says wants Syria elections, ready to help Free Syrian Army

Hindustani78

BANNED
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
40,471
Reaction score
-47
Country
India
Location
India
Updated: October 24, 2015 18:26 IST
Russia says wants Syria elections, ready to help Free Syrian Army - The Hindu

"Russia hit the factions of the Free Army and now it wants to cooperate with us, while sticking by Assad? We do not understand anything from Russia," he said.


Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the Kremlin wanted Syria to prepare for parliamentary and presidential elections, as Moscow intensified its drive to convert its increased clout with Damascus into a political settlement.

In comments which mark a shift in Russia's position, he also said that Russia's air force, which has been bombing Islamist militants in Syria since Sept. 30, would be ready to help Western-backed Free Syrian Army rebels, if it knew where they were.

The Kremlin, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's strongest foreign ally, has spoken broadly about the need for elections in Syria before. But Mr. Lavrov's comments were its most specific call for political renewal yet and came just days after a surprise visit by Mr. Assad to Moscow.

"External players can not decide anything for the Syrians. We must force them to come up with a plan for their country where the interests of every religious, ethnic and political group will be well protected," Mr. Lavrov told Russian state TV in an interview broadcast on Saturday.

"They need to prepare for both parliamentary and presidential elections."

Mr. Lavrov said the Kremlin has discussed the need for political progress with Mr. Assad during his Moscow visit and that his army's increasing success on the battlefield, with Russian air support, would consolidate his government, making it more interested in pursuing a political path.

Mr. Lavrov's interview was broadcast a day after a meeting in Vienna between Russia, the United States, Turkey and Saudi Arabia where a political solution to Syria's civil war - now in its fifth year - was discussed.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said after that meeting he expected new talks on Syria to begin as soon as next week, and did not rule out the participation of Iran, something Moscow has pushed for.

REBEL SCEPTICISM

Mr. Lavrov said he wanted Egypt, Jordan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to be included as well as Iran, and spoke of the need for the European Union to start to play a bigger role too.

He said he felt other countries were finally beginning to better understand the Syrian situation despite their continued criticism of Mr. Assad, a shift he said gave Moscow hope that the political process could move forward in the foreseeable future.

Washington has criticised Moscow for so far focusing most of its firepower on armed groups supported by the United States and others rather than Islamic State, angering the Kremlin which has said it is impossible to make a distinction between terrorists.

But Mr. Lavrov said Russia now stood ready to provide air support to the Free Syrian Army if the United States would help it identify where what he called "the patriotic opposition" was.

His offer drew deep scepticism from FSA commanders.

The commander of an FSE-affiliated rebel group that has been bombed in recent weeks by Russian warplanes dismissed the idea.

"I will not talk to my killer," Hassan Haj Ali, the head of the Liwa Suqour al-Jabal rebel group, told Reuters.

Ahmed al-Seoud, head of another FSA-affiliated group, the 13th Division, was equally bemused.

"Russia hit the factions of the Free Army and now it wants to cooperate with us, while sticking by Assad? We do not understand anything from Russia," he said.

The Free Syrian Army is a loose alliance of groups, most of them with a Syrian nationalist outlook, that are often led by Syrian army defectors but have no central command structure.

Russia's planes have flown 934 sorties and destroyed 819 militant targets in Syria since the start of its operation on Sept. 30, the Defence Ministry said on Saturday.

Mr. Lavrov called Washington's refusal to coordinate its Syria campaign with Moscow "a big mistake."
 
.
Updated: October 24, 2015 18:26 IST
Russia says wants Syria elections, ready to help Free Syrian Army - The Hindu

"Russia hit the factions of the Free Army and now it wants to cooperate with us, while sticking by Assad? We do not understand anything from Russia," he said.


Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said the Kremlin wanted Syria to prepare for parliamentary and presidential elections, as Moscow intensified its drive to convert its increased clout with Damascus into a political settlement.

In comments which mark a shift in Russia's position, he also said that Russia's air force, which has been bombing Islamist militants in Syria since Sept. 30, would be ready to help Western-backed Free Syrian Army rebels, if it knew where they were.

The Kremlin, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's strongest foreign ally, has spoken broadly about the need for elections in Syria before. But Mr. Lavrov's comments were its most specific call for political renewal yet and came just days after a surprise visit by Mr. Assad to Moscow.

"External players can not decide anything for the Syrians. We must force them to come up with a plan for their country where the interests of every religious, ethnic and political group will be well protected," Mr. Lavrov told Russian state TV in an interview broadcast on Saturday.

"They need to prepare for both parliamentary and presidential elections."

Mr. Lavrov said the Kremlin has discussed the need for political progress with Mr. Assad during his Moscow visit and that his army's increasing success on the battlefield, with Russian air support, would consolidate his government, making it more interested in pursuing a political path.

Mr. Lavrov's interview was broadcast a day after a meeting in Vienna between Russia, the United States, Turkey and Saudi Arabia where a political solution to Syria's civil war - now in its fifth year - was discussed.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said after that meeting he expected new talks on Syria to begin as soon as next week, and did not rule out the participation of Iran, something Moscow has pushed for.

REBEL SCEPTICISM

Mr. Lavrov said he wanted Egypt, Jordan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to be included as well as Iran, and spoke of the need for the European Union to start to play a bigger role too.

He said he felt other countries were finally beginning to better understand the Syrian situation despite their continued criticism of Mr. Assad, a shift he said gave Moscow hope that the political process could move forward in the foreseeable future.

Washington has criticised Moscow for so far focusing most of its firepower on armed groups supported by the United States and others rather than Islamic State, angering the Kremlin which has said it is impossible to make a distinction between terrorists.

But Mr. Lavrov said Russia now stood ready to provide air support to the Free Syrian Army if the United States would help it identify where what he called "the patriotic opposition" was.

His offer drew deep scepticism from FSA commanders.

The commander of an FSE-affiliated rebel group that has been bombed in recent weeks by Russian warplanes dismissed the idea.

"I will not talk to my killer," Hassan Haj Ali, the head of the Liwa Suqour al-Jabal rebel group, told Reuters.

Ahmed al-Seoud, head of another FSA-affiliated group, the 13th Division, was equally bemused.

"Russia hit the factions of the Free Army and now it wants to cooperate with us, while sticking by Assad? We do not understand anything from Russia," he said.

The Free Syrian Army is a loose alliance of groups, most of them with a Syrian nationalist outlook, that are often led by Syrian army defectors but have no central command structure.

Russia's planes have flown 934 sorties and destroyed 819 militant targets in Syria since the start of its operation on Sept. 30, the Defence Ministry said on Saturday.

Mr. Lavrov called Washington's refusal to coordinate its Syria campaign with Moscow "a big mistake."

Great move; an election should unite the country.
 
.
yup it will help the whole country and plus the war must finish fast
 
. .
lol russia saw what a huge mistake they did and now they try to save face hahahaha


Make no mistake. Alliance has all the time in the world. Insurgents have no MANPADS and cannot shoot down a single Russian aircraft.
 
. .
But Mr. Lavrov said Russia now stood ready to provide air support to the Free Syrian Army if the United States would help it identify where what he called "the patriotic opposition" was.

that is different from putin's position.

the original source for this news is reuters... can it be believed??

Great move; an election should unite the country.

elections are not automatic way to peace and progress... we in south asia should know that better than anyone else.

even though most syrians will support bashar al-assad or at least the baathists, western-style "representative democracy" with multi-party elections are fake-democracy and will create instability that will remove syria from being the last country in west asia that opposes nato.

iraq, libya, syria were destabilized for a reason.
 
.
Syria should have a Christian as president, a Shia as PM, a Sunni as speaker of the house, a Kurd as VP. That way everyone is happy.
 
.
Syria should have a Christian as president, a Shia as PM, a Sunni as speaker of the house, a Kurd as VP. That way everyone is happy.

no, rather than do the mistake of having western-style "representative democracy" and having a obsolete "power vested with the few" government structure, they should dismantle all parties and deliver power to the people via direct-democracy within progressive/socialist guidance, which will automatically take care of involving all ethnicities and sects there.

i don't see why the syrian opposition or nato should object to "authority of the people" true democracy. :D
 
.
that is different from putin's position.

the original source for this news is reuters... can it be believed??



elections are not automatic way to peace and progress... we in south asia should know that better than anyone else.

even though most syrians will support bashar al-assad or at least the baathists, western-style "representative democracy" with multi-party elections are fake-democracy and will create instability that will remove syria from being the last country in west asia that opposes nato.

iraq, libya, syria were destabilized for a reason.

This is just a PR move.

Everyone in the world knows that with big Sunni around, most democracy will bring tyranny against minorities because Sunni want to kill and rape every single of them.
 
.
that is different from putin's position.

the original source for this news is reuters... can it be believed??



elections are not automatic way to peace and progress... we in south asia should know that better than anyone else.

even though most syrians will support bashar al-assad or at least the baathists, western-style "representative democracy" with multi-party elections are fake-democracy and will create instability that will remove syria from being the last country in west asia that opposes nato.

iraq, libya, syria were destabilized for a reason.
Its not a fake democracy, its just muslims cant take politics unless its iron fist.
 
.
This is just a PR move.

Everyone in the world knows that with big Sunni around, democracy will bring tyranny against minorities because Sunni wanted to kill and rape every single of them.

i am sunni and i support bashar al-assad... libya was a sunni vs sunni war too... the syrian majority supporting the syrian government forces and bashar, most of those would be sunni too.

come on, the famous "syrian girl" is sunni... even bashar's wife is sunni.

i don't know why you have this automatic hate against sunnis and consider the syria war to be sunni vs shia fight... it is not... the syria and libya wars were about capitalism vs socialism... simple.
 
.
i am sunni and i support bashar al-assad... libya was a sunni vs sunni war too... the syrian majority supporting the syrian government forces and bashar, most of those would be sunni too.

come on, the famous "syrian girl" is sunni... even bashar's wife is sunni.

i don't know why you have this automatic hate against sunnis and consider the syria war to be sunni vs shia fight... it is not... the syria and libya wars were about capitalism vs socialism... simple.

The fact that Syrian under Assad can change religion and no rape evangelism compared to most other Sunni states tells all.

Right now, Pakistan is still wiggling and talking her way out, how she is not able to stop conversion to Islam by rape.
 
.
its just muslims cant take politics unless its iron fist.

we must understand that most muslim countries were either born out of progressive/socialist revolution/liberation movements or the governments there are anti-democracy repressive ones assisted by western governments... it is indeed sad that either way hard rule or hard options were called for.

Its not a fake democracy

western-style multi-party "representative democracies" are essentially capitalist dictatorships, especially in the west, where establishment-loved parties turn in the merry-go-around of elections waiting for their turn at presidentship or prime ministership.

in usa, it will be either republican or democrats, with not much difference between them in terms of internal policy and foreign policy... will the establishment there be comfortable or allow for a alliance of the "communist party of usa" and "occupy" and perhaps the "green party" to become a transitionary president, to transition towards direct-democracy?? the alliance should be allowed, yes?? after all, the minimal welfare system in usa will be enhanced by the alliance and the parasitic wall street capitalism removed... "humanism against capitalism" should be allowed, yes??

and we want "authority of the people" after all, with the people gathering in progressive communes making decisions and ideas for local and global concerns, and this will be through replacement of the system... if the present system is even partly democratic, it should allow movement towards direct-democracy, true democracy. :)

The fact that Syrian under Assad can change religion

can that happen under iran's mullah government?? :)

syria is guided by the socialist ba'ath movement, which makes it immediately different from the gulfi states especially.
 
Last edited:
.
The UN can oversee such an election to make sure it's fair. Americans, Europeans, they can all send observers.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom