Russia holds Japan whaling research vessel

[sahaliyan]

China and Soviet split, US and Iran split. China could also split with the US at certain time if needed.

To be fair,the communists did a good job to build an industry system for China,I will not deny this,also the Communists improve the education standard of China.
I will against any revolution to overthrow current system,because it harm national interests and people(see what happened in Egypt and USSR,we should learn from their mistakes),I support the reform to make China more democratic and open,but the revolution,no

 

[Aepsilons]

I was always immensely amazed at the similarity of the words Russia and Prussia. I think before Christianity we were brotherly tribes.

The name comes from the Prussi who were a Baltic tribe similar to the Latvians. They became Germanized after about 1200AD as Prussia was settled by mostly Saxon people who absorbed and dominated the native Prussians. This was part of the "Ostsiedlung" or settlement of the East. The Prussian language died out during the middle ages.

Prussia in German= "Preußen" from "Prūsa" which is Old Prussian.

The later state of Prussia became associated with militarism and advanced industry. Prussia became part of a greater Germany in 1871.

I support the reform to make China more democratic and open,but the revolution,no

However it cannot be denied that revolution is a natural aspect of Chinese political reality. In fact during the Classical age, many of the Dynasties experienced 'cycles' under revolutionary overtones. Why, even Zedong once opined the necessity of 'constant revolution' of the youth. In its essence, the CPC is revolutionary in nature.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

I was always immensely amazed at the similarity of the words Russia and Prussia. I think before Christianity we were brotherly tribes.


Japan was developed country before WW2. Korea began to flourish only in the 80-90s, before the standard of living in the two Koreas deffers a little. United States wanted to put an end to China's development in 1989, when they tried to hold anti-constitutional coup. They did not get it just due to the power of the Chinese Communist Party. And if it turned out - than the United States would devide China into several states. Of which those that near the sea would reach some economic success, and those on the mainland - would be absolutely destitute.

Deng wanna reconcile the relationship with USSR prior the event of 1989.

According to him, we are both socialist brothers, and we need to economically reform together, and let's put all the feuds aside.

Too bad a traitor like Gorbachev was in charge, and he wanted to completely destroy the socialist block. Unfortunately, he has succeeded.

 

[sahaliyan]

Deng wanna reconcile the relationship with USSR prior the event of 1989.

According to him, we are both socialist brothers, and we need to economically reform together, and let's put all the feuds aside.

Too bad a traitor like Gorbachev was in charge, and he wanted to completely destroy the socialist block, unfortunately he has succeeded.

Deng didn't believe in socialist brotherhood,he believe in national interests,in whole of 1980s,we supplied weapons to the mujaheeds of Afghanistan through Pakistan to against USSR,we worked with US in 1980s

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Deng didn't believe in socialist brotherhood,he believe in national interests,in whole of 1980s,we supplied weapons to the mujaheeds of Afghanistan through Pakistan to against USSR,we worked with US in 1980s

At least he perceived USSR was not as dangerous as the West.

The event of 1989 has proven how dangerous the US really is.

 

[Aepsilons]

Deng didn't believe in socialist brotherhood,he believe in national interests,in whole of 1980s,we supplied weapons to the mujaheeds of Afghanistan through Pakistan to against USSR,we worked with US in 1980s

Very perceptive, you are.

 

[sahaliyan]

At least he perceived USSR was not as dangerous as the West.

The event of 1989 has proven how dangerous the US really is.

The break up of USSR fit for our national interests
As for the situation of 1989,I admit the students were too naïve,and a powerful government still needed that time,but most students took part in that movement want China became more progress,democratic and powerful,the end is quite sad for them
But after the 1989,Deng made China more capitalist,more opened,and more powerful,I consider Deng as greatest leader we can have in the 1900-2000

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

The break up of USSR fit for our national interests
As for the situation of 1989,I admit the students were too naïve,and a powerful government still needed that time,but most students took part in that movement want China became more progress,democratic and powerful,the end is quite sad for them
But after the 1989,Deng made China more capitalist,more opened,and more powerful,I consider Deng as greatest leader we can have in the 1900-2000

Just look the rampant corruption started from Deng's era, his policy was not flawless either.

It was Mao who founded PRC, and Deng was his successor, and you can't deny Mao's contribution just because Deng has reformed China.

Yeah, we did need to become more capitalist from a pure planned economy, but not to become fully capitalist.

 

[vostok]

The name comes from the Prussi who were a Baltic tribe similar to the Latvians. They became Germanized after about 1200AD as Prussia was settled by mostly Saxon people who absorbed and dominated the native Prussians. This was part of the "Ostsiedlung" or settlement of the East. The Prussian language died out during the middle ages.

Prussia in German= "Preußen" from "Prūsa" which is Old Prussian.

The later state of Prussia became associated with militarism and advanced industry. Prussia became part of a greater Germany in 1871.

Balts and Slavs were one community and have one language before our era.

 

[Huaren]

The break up of USSR fit for our national interests
As for the situation of 1989,I admit the students were too naïve,and a powerful government still needed that time,but most students took part in that movement want China became more progress,democratic and powerful,the end is quite sad for them
But after the 1989,Deng made China more capitalist,more opened,and more powerful,I consider Deng as greatest leader we can have in the 1900-2000

The 1989 was a concentrated strike aimed to disturb the course of guided liberalisation "CPC style". The student and original founders of the movement just wanted to tackle corruption, but then it was hijacked to become something else. And those "late coming" leaders "planned out" their escape routes, at least. After 1989 China was able to finally enter "golden age" of development relatively undisturbed for decades

 

[Götterdämmerung]

I was always immensely amazed at the similarity of the words Russia and Prussia. I think before Christianity we were brotherly tribes.

The name Prussia derived indeed from a Slavic tribe in the Baltic region that germanised through Germanic fiefdom and royal succession.

 

[sahaliyan]

Just look the rampant corruption started from Deng's era, his policy was not flawless either.

It was Mao who founded PRC, and Deng was his successor, and you can't deny Mao's contribution just because Deng has reformed China.

Yeah, we did need to become more capitalist from a pure planned economy, but not fully capitalist.

I don't deny Mao's contribution,for example,after Mao's rule,nearly every young people were literate,and he built the heavy industry system.And too many railways and roads built in his rule,especially in mountainrous southwest China,I have a balance view on Mao's rule,he was also responsible for millions died in great leap forward and cultural revolution(and partly of civil war),his role is mixed,I think historians will give him a fair evaluate in the future

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

I don't deny Mao's contribution,for example,after Mao's rule,nearly every young people were literate,and he built the heavy industry system.And too many railways and roads built in his rule,especially in mountainrous southwest China,I have a balance view on Mao's rule,he was also responsible for millions died in great leap forward and cultural revolution(and partly of civil war),his role is mixed,I think historians will give him a fair evaluate in the future

It was KMT who started the civil war, how you can solely blame Mao for that?

Without that civil war, how we can overthrow KMT and saved China from these traitors?

China's population was booming during Mao's era, but the population growth was completely stalled during the ROC era.

Even Deng claimed that Mao was 70% right and 30% wrong, and are you going to deny the statement from Deng?

 

[Aepsilons]

Balts and Slavs were one community and have one language before our era.

What I also admire is that the origins of both Germanics and early Russians were from Northern Europe, especially Scandinavia. Is it not correct that the first Kings of Kievan Rus were Vikings ? There is an unalienable link between these two peoples, civilizations.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

What I also admire is that the origins of both Germanics and early Russians were from Northern Europe, especially Scandinavia. Is it not correct that the first Kings of Kievan Rus were Vikings ?

Many Russian nationalists believe that the Rus was not Viking, but a Scytho-Sarmatian tribe from the steppe. The Rus means Roxolani which means light.