What's new

Russia arrests Chinese national for spying

Russians are scared that the Chinese will copy the S-300. May be that's why that's why they limited for operational purpose and not ToT like that. Copy is always inferior than the real one. Nothing surprise.

few of S-300 components really were cloned into the HQ-9. HQ-9 stands nowhere near S-300, May be they tried to find the real one. So, the news.


WTF, this video is BS, our naval HQ-9 is cold launch.

Type 052C (Luyang-II Class) Missile Destroyer - SinoDefence.com

A troll will always be a troll. :no:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Recently the Russian military limited , if not, ceased weapon sale to China. If money failed, then i guess espionage is the only viable solution.
 
.
Russia has sold the S-300 repair documents to China a long time ago, so why is China trying to steal it again? Weird.
 
.
Russia has sold the S-300 repair documents to China a long time ago, so why is China trying to steal it again? Weird.

Maybe its not documents they send.. must be repair bills. Who knows.:what:
 
. . .
Do you still believe it is plausible that the China from today still needs to steal the outdated technology like S-300?

They didn't claim S-500, something that China could be possibly interested about.

It is S-300, so it is definitely an advertisement for their S-300, because it is so wonderful, even a military power like China is still drooling over this particular technology.

IF IT SO AS PER YOUR VIEW THEN WHY YOU HAVE BOUGHT RUSSIAN ENGINES FOR YOUR FIGHTER JETS.
 
. . . . . . . .
Do you still believe it is plausible that the China from today still needs to steal the outdated technology like S-300?
Yes. Because S-300 is better than what China got today.

---------- Post added at 12:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:34 PM ----------

We already had HQ-19 long time ago
Does HQ-19 exist for real? No photos seen.

We already managed to play the midcourse interception with 5500km range and 350km of altitude.
Then it is something else other than S-300/S-400.

Do you think it is plausible for us to steal some primitive toys like S-300?
Yes, because,

1. Chinese SAMs are not what they are cracked up to be. HQ-19 may not even be real.
2. Russia kept away its best tech away from China.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom