What's new

Russia arrests Chinese national for spying

Russians are scared that the Chinese will copy the S-300. May be that's why that's why they limited for operational purpose and not ToT like that. Copy is always inferior than the real one. Nothing surprise.

few of S-300 components really were cloned into the HQ-9. HQ-9 stands nowhere near S-300, May be they tried to find the real one. So, the news.


WTF, this video is BS, our naval HQ-9 is cold launch.

Type 052C (Luyang-II Class) Missile Destroyer - SinoDefence.com

A troll will always be a troll. :no:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Recently the Russian military limited , if not, ceased weapon sale to China. If money failed, then i guess espionage is the only viable solution.
 
Russia has sold the S-300 repair documents to China a long time ago, so why is China trying to steal it again? Weird.
 
Russia has sold the S-300 repair documents to China a long time ago, so why is China trying to steal it again? Weird.

Maybe its not documents they send.. must be repair bills. Who knows.:what:
 
Do you still believe it is plausible that the China from today still needs to steal the outdated technology like S-300?

They didn't claim S-500, something that China could be possibly interested about.

It is S-300, so it is definitely an advertisement for their S-300, because it is so wonderful, even a military power like China is still drooling over this particular technology.

IF IT SO AS PER YOUR VIEW THEN WHY YOU HAVE BOUGHT RUSSIAN ENGINES FOR YOUR FIGHTER JETS.
 
Do you still believe it is plausible that the China from today still needs to steal the outdated technology like S-300?
Yes. Because S-300 is better than what China got today.

---------- Post added at 12:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:34 PM ----------

We already had HQ-19 long time ago
Does HQ-19 exist for real? No photos seen.

We already managed to play the midcourse interception with 5500km range and 350km of altitude.
Then it is something else other than S-300/S-400.

Do you think it is plausible for us to steal some primitive toys like S-300?
Yes, because,

1. Chinese SAMs are not what they are cracked up to be. HQ-19 may not even be real.
2. Russia kept away its best tech away from China.
 
Back
Top Bottom