TechLahore
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 1,741
- Reaction score
- 0
I think it should be "we get what they want to give us".
Bringing the engine for jf17 into the discussion is just mere extrapolation, the fact is Pakistan cannot buy say a full fledged fighter or submarine from Russia. The statement under discussion just emphasizes this fact.
We could say that, but then we would be wrong.
Pakistan looked into obtaining the SU-27 in the 90s and there were several available options via Ukraine. The PAF did not push that deal eventually because of the long-standing preference for western platforms like the Mirage-2000 and the F-16.
On the issue of Subs, why would we go and buy a sub from Russia... a country which has not had the opportunity to invest anything at all in its Sub programme over the last 15+ years? Why would we not obtain better options available via the Europeans. Our Agosta deal included ToT. Why would we, in our right minds, pursue a Russian sub when more advanced options are available to us? And if we wanted something lower cost, Chinese subs would be present a far better alternative. The Chinese have aggressively invested in their sub platforms, unlike the Russians, and have developed boats that are now - on the whole - more modern.
Similarly, on the subject of aircraft, the PAF is incredibly resistant to Russian airplanes. The upgraded RD-93 engine is one thing, but going with a complete Russian aircraft would simply be a bridge too far for numerous reasons internal to the PAF. Again, if we were going to spend the money, why wouldn't we exercise the remaining options on Block-52s? Obtain more units of the FC-20 or look into the UAE 2000-9s? Doesn't make sense for Pakistan to operate a Russian aircraft, and if you think we are in the least bit interested in pursuing one, you are incredibly mistaken.
Since we wouldn't want a Russian jet or sub, like I said previously, we get what we need/want. Tanks, engines... that's pretty much been the extent of Russian items on our wish list.