RSS

[Loafer]

RSS are Hindu Religious nutjobbers.

While Terrorists have no religion, they are Secular.

Oh Wait! Secular People have no religion, they are terrorists.

How bloody apt!

 

[Gadkari]

Whats wrong with liking chicks?

Are you gay?

Cheers, Doc

What wrong with gay ? ................ you a homo-phobe and a Bigot ?

 

[ranjeet]

LOL...... you are no fan of "Nehru" since you are a muslim, only a fan of "Nehruvian secularism"

A defective philosophy by a hugely defective man.

Nehru has committed far too many political blunders, we don't need to dig into his personal life.

 

[padamchen]

What wrong with gay ? ................ you a homo-phobe and a Bigot ?

Whats wrong with liking chicks?

You say it like its a perversion, so asking.

Are you seriously Hindu?

Cheers, Doc

 

[Chhatrapati]

LOL...... you are no fan of "Nehru" since you are a muslim, only a fan of "Nehruvian secularism"

A defective philosophy by a hugely defective man.

Awww!! i Like that. Now you understand what I like. Brilliant man!

 

[Gadkari]

Nehru has committed far too many political blunders, we don't need to dig into his personal life.

His personal life provides a glimpse into his Non existent Ethics , Values and Morality.

So any philosophy that such a Perverted person comes up with, is devoid of any such ethical or moral values.

If we were not discussing "Nehruvian secularism" or any Nehruvian philosophy , then there is no need to dig into his sordid personal life.

Awww!! i Like that. Now you understand what I like. Brilliant man!

Are you sure ? the same thing is true for your profit muhammed. You get it now ?

 

[padamchen]

His personal life provides a glimpse into his Non existent Ethics , Values and Morality.

So any philosophy that such a Perverted person comes up with, is devoid of any such ethical or moral values.

If we were not discussing "Nehruvian secularism" or any Nehruvian philosophy , then there is no need to dig into his sordid personal life.



Are you sure ? the same thing is true or your profit muhammed. You get it now ?

You sound like no Hindu I know.

Even the nutjobs do not have your views on se.x

Cheers, Doc

 

[Gadkari]

Whats wrong with liking chicks?

You say it like its a perversion, so asking.

Are you seriously Hindu?

Cheers, Doc

Let me make it simple for you.

I do not like my kids to hang out with s-e-xual predators and perverts.

Now tell me, what is wrong with this image ?

You sound like no Hindu I know.

Even the nutjobs do not have your views on se.x

Cheers, Doc

I have no view on s-e-x.

I only have view on public philosophy and examining the background of the person proposing it.

Its clear you lack the intelligence to understand this distinction, but there is nothing much I can do to help. Try reading my post multiple times.

 

[padamchen]

Let me make it simple for you.

I do not like my kids to hang out with s-e-xual predators and perverts.

Now tell me, what is wrong with this image ?

Nothing. Aside from the fact that you have a filthy mind.

Cheers, Doc

 

[Gadkari]

Nothing. Aside from the fact that you have a filthy mind.

Cheers, Doc

Nope. Just a mind that tells me to educate kids about Sexual predators and teach them out 'good touch' and 'bad touch'.

Maybe you are in denial. or maybe you sympathize with these sexual predators. How old are you again ?

My advice to Nehru, Keep those hands to yourself. Don't go around touching little girls. Especially since you have Syphilis.

 

[salimpheku]

Nothing. Aside from the fact that you have a filthy mind.

Cheers, Doc

Shh, don't let your fellow liberals from "secular countries" read this or listen to you.
They would lynch you buddy.

What Nehru is doing in those photos is classic case of molestation. In he is doing that in public and getting away with it, imagine what this pervert would be doing when there is no attention.

 

[salimpheku]

Look at what Indira Gandhi thought of Savarkar -
Seculars need a bucket load of burnol.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...-gandhi-endorsement-of-savarkar/1/206846.html

On December 5 last year, when Lok Sabha Speaker Manohar Joshi expressed the wish to put up a portrait of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in the Central Hall of Parliament, Congress Deputy Leader in the Lok Sabha Shivraj Patil merely asked, "Where's the space?" Normally, no proposal to put up a portrait or a statue is rejected outright, "least of all when it is made by the Speaker himself", says Patil.

If the former Lok Sabha Speaker remained silent for form's sake, CPI(M) leader Somnath Chatterjee also didn't resist the idea. Perhaps it was the donation of his father N.C. Chatterjee's portrait to Parliament in 1995 that weighed on his mind. The senior Chatterjee, who succeeded Savarkar as the Hindu Mahasabha president, represented Hoogly in the first Lok Sabha and his portrait was unveiled in the Central Hall by the then vice-president K.R. Narayanan.

Also silent were the Congress chief whip in the Rajya Sabha Pranab Mukherjee and CPI's J. Chittaranjan, two of the members of the joint committee on installation of portraits/statues of national leaders and parliamentarians in the Parliament House Complex.

WINNING MOVE: Vinayak Damodar Savarkar's portrait unveiled in Parliament
Voices
"Savarkar's defiance of the British government has its own place in the freedom struggle."
Indira Gandhi
Former prime minister

"Indira may not have been aware of Savarkar's clemency pleas. Why should Sonia repeat her mistake?"
Bipan Chandra
Former history professor, JNU

"You can disagree with Savarkar's Hindutva, but you can't brand him anti-national."
Vasant Sathe
Former I&B minister

"No proposal to put up a portrait in Parliament is rejected, least of all when it is made by the Speaker."
Shivraj Patil
Congress deputy leader in Lok Sabha

Yet, not until February 25 this year, when Congress President Sonia Gandhi - persuaded by the CPI(M) and a group of Delhi historians - wrote to President A.P.J. Abdul Kalam to review his decision to unveil Savarkar's portrait, did she discover that her senior colleagues had agreed to Joshi's proposal. A peeved Sonia humiliated Patil and Mukherjee at a meeting of the Political Affairs Committee of the Congress in Parliament.

The party's problems did not end there. A controversy began to take shape as the BJP went about its task of revealing how former prime minister Indira Gandhi had extended her patronage to perpetuate Savarkar's memory.

Sonia loyalists winced when informed of Indira's decision to issue a commemorative stamp in Savarkar's honour in 1970, a private donation of Rs 11,000 to his memorial fund a decade later, her hailing Savarkar's "daring defiance of the British government" as having its own "important place in the annals of our freedom movement" and even commissioning a Films Division documentary on him.

However, Indira's endorsement of Savarkar failed to embarrass the Left historians who had pushed Sonia to trash Savarkar. "Indira did all that she did perhaps because she was unaware of Savarkar's numerous clemency petitions to the British. Why should Sonia repeat her mistake?" asks Bipan Chandra, former professor of history at Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University. Chandra claims he himself became aware of Savarkar's mercy pleas only two years ago when some freedom fighters opposed the renaming of Shaheed Park in Port Blair after Savarkar.

However, the Congress-sponsored vilification of Savarkar, a hero in Maharashtra, has upset several party leaders. "Indira Gandhi was not a narrow-minded person," says former Union information and broadcasting minister Vasant Sathe. In 1983, he recalls, she personally cleared the Films Division documentary on the freedom fighter. "Savarkar's contribution to the freedom struggle has to be viewed in totality. You can disagree with his Hindutva, but you cannot ignore the fact that he was a great poet and a rationalist," he says.

That is a view Sonia will not want to hear as she swings between hard secularism and soft Hindutva. Perhaps the outcome of the Himachal Pradesh assembly elections will decide the flavour of the coming season.

 

[I.R.A]

Whats wrong with liking chicks?

Are you gay? Be honest. Nobody knows who you are here.

@I.R.A could you tag that Karachi friend of yours here please?

Cheers, Doc

I didn't get any notification for this tag.

And that Karachi friend is still not fully cleared to qualify as one ....... plus he hates anything india.

 

[padamchen]

I didn't get any notification for this tag.

And that Karachi friend is still not fully cleared to qualify as one ....... plus he hates anything india.

You'll be surprised what true love can do to hate between countries ....

Cheers, Doc

 

[I.R.A]

You'll be surprised what true love can do to hate between countries ....

Cheers, Doc

Believe me he has better mental health than your RSS buddies here. One can go to any extent in hate ..... they are the classic examples of that.