why are you bringing faiths between? i already said i have no problem with islam. i have problem with muslims of south asia. that means i am against particular group of people because of their wrong doing in past. and i want it should not happen in future.
Since you evidently have only a shallow knowledge of history, this is a conclusion that you will find possible. The truth remains, and it is on record, that it was hate-mongers like Savarkar, the gutless toady of the British, and Tilak, a bigot, even as he was a brave patriot and inveterate opponent of the British, as well as a martyr to the cause of freedom, who brought in the Two Nation Theory. Your problems with the Muslims of south Asia are rooted elsewhere , not in them.
Please also do not bother to sell the old, moth-eaten story that the Muslim League wanted partition, or were responsible for partition. If you do not know the facts, you are doing nothing but depending on your anti-Muslim prejudice, which is why you got a negative rating. A deserved one.
I have seen your posts. you are particularly hostile towards Hindus. and you have soft corner for Pakistanis. I suspect you are false flagged Pakistani or traitor.
No.
That is the conclusion of a propaganda-spouting Sangh Parivar apparatchik.
I am against Hindutvavadi, not particularly against Hindus, not any more than I am against Muslims, or Christians, or Jews, or Buddhists, or Jains, or Sikhs. Or whatever.
The exact points that you just raised... the Khalsa thing and Hindu resurgence.... is what was expected of you IN REPLY TO HIS POST.
EXPECTED of me?????
By whom?
Whose orders should I be following, which I have neglected to do?
I am sorry, very sorry, but I DO NOT work to meet the expectations of others. My moral compass is on very steady mountings, thank you very much.
What I meant for Indian members is that off late you have been awarding these ratings in Indian threads only. I haven't seen you around on the others threads recently (pro freedom movement in P-OK, Su-35 to Pak, etc) where many negative ratings were given for fun and later reversed by SlavDefence.... Might be a co-incidence or your thread preferences... I will leave it to you.... but this is what I saw and hence I said.... only to Indians (obviously meaning in Indian threads).
That only shows that you have no clue about what I have been doing, after a very long absence, on this forum. My ratings are reversed, but rarely. I take them seriously. You mentioned thread preferences. It is precisely that. I have no interest in political or social threads, normally, but this one was too crass to be left alone. Otherwise I am normally interested specifically in military history, military developments within the Indian Army and the Pakistani Army and the PLA, in the recent political history of the sub-continent, and in Indian history (in the classical sense of Indian) from Mohenjodaro onwards.
Some of my most pleasant moments, pleasant because instructive, have been on Bangladesh threads. Recently there was a fascinating exchange of ideas on the Bengali - or Bangladeshi - language, and its script. I learnt a lot.
Secondly, what you mean by Sangh trained trolls? Are you an IT- Spy or NSA who can track ip's of users to know whether he is Sangh parivar or not? Isn't it highly biased view? You may disagree with the poster... but how can you claim anything personal about him?
The uniformity of language, the hunting in packs, the uniform vulgarity and propensity to cast aspersions on everyone else's patriotism. I teach nowadays. It isn't difficult to work out plagiarised or homogenised habits.
I have been extremely patient with you. Please watch your language. I have come to the conclusions that I have over several years of participation in on line fora, not just this one. Try, if it does not do you a physical injury, not to tell me what I am entitled to do, or not entitled to do.
Same thing when
@gau8av asked you about your professional background (something on those lines) you said you have been given the authority of giving ratings to others hence its your prerogative and will not mind not giving any explanation. ( a polite way of saying... I am the responsible one... you guys are not ). Isn't it a moral high ground unidirectionally taken by you?
None of his business. If the administration of this forum has any doubts or queries, they will talk to me direct.
Anyways.... lets leave it at that. I agree you are a responsible and knowledgeable poster (hence the 'tag' on you) and I trust your judgement generally....while in this one case I had some reservations which I posted already.
It is better left at that.
I am not inclined to justify myself or my actions every time a fresh generation of posters joins PakDef.