Rohingya refugess in Ruili,Yunnan

[kankan326]

Go back where they came from. Why should we pay for the mistakes made by others. By the way, The Rohigyas are not so innocent. They caused religious conflicts in Burma and want to separate the country to establish an Islamic country. They are trouble makers. China should never accept them.

 

[55100864]

@kalu_miah
U know that a stable Myanmar is vital for China's strategic interests consider the pipeline and other strategic projects we are currently developing in that region, by logic, China should send more pressure to Myanmar to cool it down, however, people seems expects too much from China, we don't have the level of influence that people may think regards to Myanmar, u know that they even dropped bombs in our border last year, and there are some anti-China protester try to stop the projects, the west say that we are losing the Myanmar, although that's bullshit.
it's well know that Aung San Suu Kyi is very pro-west and we don't like her, but we have urged the Myanmar military to corporate with her. anyway, hope the situation is getting better.

 

[kalu_miah]

Go back where they came from. Why should we pay for the mistakes made by others. By the way, The Rohigyas are not so innocent. They caused religious conflicts in Burma and want to separate the country to establish an Islamic country. They are trouble makers. China should never accept them.

Let me guess, all Muslims are separatists and terrorists!

 

[Okemos]

Let me guess, all Muslims are separatists and terrorists!

Not terrorists but most of them are separatists. When Muslim population reaches critical mass, they start to congregate and want Islamic law etc etc. India's partition already offers great example. Also Eastern Europe in last decade.

If those people stay in China for a hundred years, pretty sure they will demand a separate state.

I know you will disagree since you are a Muslim yourself, but don't take it as offense if my words don't sound mellow enough。

 

[kalu_miah]

Then I find your politicians are not smart like the Pakistani elites,nearly all the political parties of Pakistan are pro-China.You can see,the Sino-Pak friendship was started by Ali Bhutto,then Zia ul-Haq overthrowed him,Zia didn't say,Oh this friendship was started by Bhutto,let us change it.No,he deeper the friendship.And When PPP in power again,BB didn't say,oh,the Chinese support the junta and dictator,let's end the friendship,no,she is pro-China too.Just like both Musharaff and Nawaz Sharif are pro-China.You can blame the pakistani elites for corruption and many bad things,but they still care their national interests in some extent

You are absolutely correct. Our elites have been morons. Our earlier generation have been brainwashed by Indian agents and some traitors who helped breakup Pakistan with Indian help. Chinese leaders were dead set against the breakup of Pakistan (1971). The same Indian agents are still in power. Another set of morons tried to play nice with these traitors, but got killed (late Zia) and removed (his wife Khaleda Zia). Please go through the thread and post links in post #31 of this thread to get a better idea, when you have some time.

But by this time, it has become clear to our people (90% Muslims) who these people are and who they represent, but we cannot do anything because Indian intelligence have infiltrated the country with their help and they are now ruling at gun point.

Our people are lying low and looking for allies who can help us get out of this Indian slavery. So far the senior Chinese posters in PDF have told me that China has a nonintervention policy and it will stay this way for 15-20 years till China reaches parity with the US.

If there is no help from any other sources, we will have no choice but to wait for help from outside.

But our situation is not unique, because of what some crazy middle-eastern Muslims did on world stage, all Muslims now have the label of terrorists, and we have become open or undeclared enemy for many powerful countries. Lets see who will come to our side to help us get through this period. Will it be China, will it be someone else, is there anyone at all? We will find out in time. May be I will open a thread on this topic.

 

[Black Widow]

Send them back. They look violent and a liability to the country.

Damn people who pray all day and do nothing to help the country.

Even Pakistanis don't like Rohingyas.

If I would have posted this truth I would have been banned from this thread.. Since you are with chinese flag you get special treatment..

These ppl are ethenic Arab , The hot, humid condition and marriage with local change there color and look.... These ppl are not Indian.. Not all mongolid ppl are chinese not all ppl like this are Indian. They are Arab (from the land of Muhammad), they are not welcome in India..

They are similar to majority Bangladeshi's, converts from Dalit. They belong in Bangladesh among their own people. Bangladesh should take all Rohingya refugees, it is their natural homeland.

Sorry u are wrong these ppl are settlers from Arabia.. They are not from Indian subconotinent..

 

[kalu_miah]

Not terrorists but most of them are separatists. When Muslim population reaches critical mass, they start to congregate and want Islamic law etc etc. India's partition already offers great example. Also Eastern Europe in last decade.

If those people stay in China for a hundred years, pretty sure they will demand a separate state.

I know you will disagree since you are a Muslim yourself, but don't take it as offense if my words don't sound mellow enough。

First of all you should not generalize, that is the first sign of racism or chauvinism.

You have the wrong impression. I will explain how. In Bengal, the British took power from Nawabs of Bengal but when they left, they gave most of it to India, how is that separatism? Bengal was ruled by Muslims from 1204 -1757.
Bengal Sultanate:
Places and Structures of Ancient Bengal: Paintings and Pictures

Arakan used to be a vassal of Bengal Sultanate for centuries, long before it was conquered by Myanmar king around 1785. This happened because of the fall of Bengal to British in 1757 and the British did not look after Bengal's Vassals, but after 41 years, it was taken over by the British in 1826. British in 1947 decided to give Arakan to Burma.

The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier, 1204–1760
"The reigns of Sultan ‘Ala al-Din Husain Shah (1493–1519) and his son Nasir al-Din Nusrat Shah (1519–32) are generally regarded as the “golden age” of the Bengal sultanate.[90] In Husain Shah’s reign, for example, Bengali Hindus participated in government to a considerable degree: his chief minister (vazīr), his chief of bodyguards, his master of the mint, his governor of Chittagong, his private physician, and his private secretary (dabīr-i khāṣ) were all Bengali Hindus.[91] In terms of its physical power and territorial extent, too, this was the sultanate’s high tide. In the second year of his reign, 1494, Sultan Husain Shah extended the kingdom’s northern frontiers, invading and annexing both Kuch Bihar (“Kamata”) and western Assam (“Kamrup”).[92] Writing around 1515, Tome Pires estimated this monarch’s armed forces at a hundred thousand cavalrymen. “He fights with heathen kings, great lords and greater than he,” wrote the Portuguese official, “but because the king of Bengal is nearer to the sea, he is more practised in war, and he prevails over them.”[93] The king thus managed to make a circle of vassals of his neighbors: Orissa to the southwest, Arakan to the southeast, and Tripura to the east.[94]

But the palmy days of independent Bengal were numbered. Even as the Husain Shahi dynasty was taking root, Babur, a brilliant Timurid prince, was rising to prominence in Central Asia and Afghanistan. In 1526, resolving to make a bid for empire in North India, Babur led his cavalry and cannon through the Khyber Pass and overthrew the Lodi dynasty of Afghans, the last rulers of a vastly shrunken and decayed Delhi sultanate. As a result of this triumph, defeated Afghans moved down the Gangetic plain and into the Bengal delta, where they were hospitably received by Nasir al-Din Nusrat Shah.[95] Thus the span of a century from the death of Jalal al-Din Muhammad (d. 1432) to that of Nasir al-Din Nusrat Shah (d. 1532) witnessed a wholesale transformation of Bengal’s political fabric. In the reign of the former sultan, descendants of old Turkish families had still formed the kingdom’s dominant ruling group. But in the following century the scope of Bengali participation at all levels of government continually widened, while the throne itself passed from Indo-Turks, to East Africans, to an Arab house, and, finally, to Afghans."

Pakistan has never been a part of any Hindu state or empire except some parts of it for brief periods since around 1000 AD.
Ghaznavids - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you go through this thread from the beginning, I am agreeing with all Chinese that they should not stay in China. But where should they go that is the question. For that you have to look for who created this Rohingya problem to begin with. I blame the British for giving Arakan as a gift to Burma and then the Bamars decided to make these people non-citizens just because they did not like their ethnicity and religion and then systematically tried to cleanse them from Rakhine state (former independent state of Arakan), this is classic ethnic cleansing:
Allow Rohingyas citizenship, UN tells Burma | DVB Multimedia Group
MyanmarGovt Rejects UN Calls for ‘Rohingya’ Citizenship

 

[sahaliyan]

You are absolutely correct. Our elites have been morons. Our earlier generation have been brainwashed by Indian agents and some traitors who helped breakup Pakistan with Indian help. Chinese leaders were dead set against the breakup of Pakistan (1971). The same Indian agents are still in power. Another set of morons tried to play nice with these traitors, but got killed (late Zia) and removed (his wife Khaleda Zia). Please go through the thread and post links in post #31 of this thread to get a better idea, when you have some time.

But by this time, it has become clear to our people (90% Muslims) who these people are and who they represent, but we cannot do anything because Indian intelligence have infiltrated the country with their help and they are now ruling at gun point.

Our people are lying low and looking for allies who can help us get out of this Indian slavery. So far the senior Chinese posters in PDF have told me that China has a nonintervention policy and it will stay this way for 15-20 years till China reaches parity with the US.

If there is no help from any other sources, we will have no choice but to wait for help from outside.

But our situation is not unique, because of what some crazy middle-eastern Muslims did on world stage, all Muslims now have the label of terrorists, and we have become open or undeclared enemy for many powerful countries. Lets see who will come to our side to help us get through this period. Will it be China, will it be someone else, is there anyone at all? We will find out in time. May be I will open a thread on this topic.

I think sometimes you leaders have no choice,they should to play with Indians right now,just like even Nepal share border with us,but the borderland is Tibet,the traffic is very bad,for survive they should trade with Indians,to get the necessities and goods.
Now the Qinghai-Tibet railway is open,and Lhasa-Shigatse railway will open in sepetember this year.And we will build Shigatse-Nyalam railway this year,Nyalam is in the China-Nepal border,after we finished the work of Shigatse-Nyalam railway,surely we will build the railway into kathmandu(this is just a time issue)，and then Nepal can get rid of dependence of Indian goods.
But we will not biuld military bases in any other countries,this is just against our diplomatic principle

Not terrorists but most of them are separatists. When Muslim population reaches critical mass, they start to congregate and want Islamic law etc etc. India's partition already offers great example. Also Eastern Europe in last decade.

If those people stay in China for a hundred years, pretty sure they will demand a separate state.

I know you will disagree since you are a Muslim yourself, but don't take it as offense if my words don't sound mellow enough。

The situation of India is different of others,the India's partition is product of history,in later 1000 years,India was always ruled by muslims,so the Hindus lost nothing in the partition,because they don't own anything before the partition(the rulers are either muslims or british),and we don't give citizenship to those people,and I'm sure after the ethnic issue solved in Burma,they should do back to Burma,after all,they are burmese muslims,not Chinese muslims who stayed in China hundereds years.

 

[kalu_miah]

I think sometimes you leaders have no choice,they should to play with Indians right now,just like even Nepal share border with us,but the borderland is Tibet,the traffic is very bad,for survive they should trade with Indians,to get the necessities and goods.
Now the Qinghai-Tibet railway is open,and Lhasa-Shigatse railway will open in sepetember this year.And we will build Shigatse-Nyalam railway this year,Nyalam is in the China-Nepal border,after we finished the work of Shigatse-Nyalam railway,surely we will build the railway into kathmandu(this is just a time issue)，and then Nepal can get rid of dependence of Indian goods.
But we will not biuld military bases in any other countries,this is just against our diplomatic principle

Our leaders do have choice, but the current leaders in power are not our leaders, they are national traitors.

I wish you good luck with Nepal, its a land locked state and they need Chinese help even more than we do. If you can get Nepal away from Indian dependence then that will be a great thing, at least in one of our neighbor states Indian aggression and influence will be defeated, which is a positive development for us.

 

[vK_man]

Go back where they came from. Why should we pay for the mistakes made by others. By the way, The Rohigyas are not so innocent. They caused religious conflicts in Burma and want to separate the country to establish an Islamic country. They are trouble makers. China should never accept them.

I think they should be converted to atheism or confucianism or buddhism and given citizenship of China. If they remain muslim ,you will have another uighur issue at hand.