Indus Falcon
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
- Messages
- 6,910
- Reaction score
- 107
- Country
- Location
Reminds one of how fast UN moved in on East Timor.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reminds one of how fast UN moved in on East Timor.
Reminds one of how fast UN moved in on East Timor.
Very true Sir.It is nationalism concept prob too . that u r truk i am bangladeshi , if we thought we are one body then no one will get the chance to touch a single body of a muslim.
Muslims have pathetic leaders now, just look at the leaders we had in the past and compare it with todays "leaders" hahaUN is a useless organisation for muslims. We should not treat it seriously. Muslim leader if any need to wake up and do something for our muslim brothers.
in 1826, the British annexed Arakan and encouraged migrations from Bengal to work as farm laborers.
After the first Anglo-Burmese War in 1826, the British annexed Arakan and encouraged migrations from Bengal to work as farm laborers. The became the Rohingyas.
After the First World War in 1914-1918, the British controlled Palestine and encouraged migrations by Jews to work as farm laborers. These became the Israelis.
I would not be surprised if many Rohingya supporters view the Jew immigration to Palestine as illegal.
Assuming Palestinians suddenly would rise to power in Israel, would the Jews
be treated better, same or worse by Muslims than how Rohingyas are treated today?
How are Christians treated by Muslims in Syria/Iraq compared to Rohingyas?
So what? That gives the Burmese the right to kick them out after a 100+ years!?
See, the fault is with the Burmese for losing to the British, they need to blame themselves first, the Rohingyas don't cause trouble, do they?You can add Tamils bought in by the Dutch and British in the 15th and 20th centuries as indentured labour from South India to the North East and Central highlands of Sri Lanka have now become Eelamist separatists to that list..
No it doesn't but there more than what meets the eye here, These people never assimilated with the rest of Myanmar or the Arakanese, Leading to the current state.. It's the prerogative of the sovereign nation of Myanmar to grant these people citizenship
See, the fault is with the Burmese for losing to the British, they need to blame themselves first, the Rohingyas don't cause trouble, do they?
I still need to do more research on this though.
They do? I just read they're not even allowed kitchen knives !!!Actually they do.. There are a wealth of info online from veritable sources not just partial ones about this conflict, Remember there is no fire without smoke, There is two sides to this story.. The Rohingya's themselves are not the sole victims
If the UN tries to intervene on behalf of every single illegal squatters in sovereign nations there would be no end to it.. EElamist Tamil terrorists separatists tried invain for decades in Sri Lanka to no avail..
Arakan was an independent kingdom for thousands of year which extended up to current Chittagong division. There were movement of people all throughout history. That is the reason we have sizable burmese and rakhine people living in Bangladesh. Its is not only the Rohingyas who found shelters in Bangladesh but entire race of Chakmas were driven out from Buram who now call Chittagong Hill Tracts as their home. Same happend to Rakhine and they settled as far as Barishal in Bangladesh. This is a contiguous land and the more you go south the less Rohingyas you will find in Arakan.After the first Anglo-Burmese War in 1826, the British annexed Arakan and encouraged migrations from Bengal to work as farm laborers. The became the Rohingyas.
You can write good poetry.After the First World War in 1914-1918, the British controlled Palestine and encouraged migrations by Jews to work as farm laborers. These became the Israelis.
It was more to do kicking out Palestininas from their own home and take away their belongings and property. Legal?I would not be surprised if many Rohingya supporters view the Jew immigration to Palestine as illegal.
Jews were treated fairly after the defeat of the crusaders. Why will it be any different now?Assuming Palestinians suddenly would rise to power in Israel, would the Jews
be treated better, same or worse by Muslims than how Rohingyas are treated today?
How are Christians treated by Muslims in Syria/Iraq compared to Rohingyas?
With this kind of attitude from the majority I dont blame Tamils for raising arms.