What's new

Retired Army Colonel, Lawrence B. Wilkerson, former chief of staff to United States Tells reasons of US presence in Afghanistan

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan

Retired Army Colonel, Lawrence B. Wilkerson, former chief of staff to United States Secretary of State,Colin Powell Tells reasons of US presence in Afghanistan: 1) Stop CPEC/Belt & Road Initiatives in Central Asia. 2) Take Pak Nukes 3) Destabilize China thro Uyghurs in Xinjiang
 
. .
Did late Gen Hameed Gul not say "Afghanistan theekhana , Pakistan nishana"?

And you hear this non sense from current Pakistani establishment that abrupt American withdrawal from Afghanistan is not good! Madness! Every single day, these fukers are spending in Afghanistan, they will be hatching conspiracies against Pakistan , even terrorism, to spread choas within our land. They need to be booted out asap.
 
. . .
Dont want to come across as rude, but you need to put your hearing piece on. This yanki doddle clearly said "we want to leap on that stockpile".

Please hear the complete sentence before concluding prematurely.
 
.
Did late Gen Hameed Gul not say "Afghanistan theekhana , Pakistan nishana"?

And you hear this non sense from current Pakistani establishment that abrupt American withdrawal from Afghanistan is not good! Madness! Every single day, these fukers are spending in Afghanistan, they will be hatching conspiracies against Pakistan , even terrorism, to spread choas within our land. They need to be booted out asap.
america helps fauji maintain status qou in Pakistan they will always bow down to america! sell offs!
 
.
Please hear the complete sentence before concluding prematurely.

I have , just pointing out to you the obvious elephant in the room that you conveniently overlooked.

May I remind you that any such act, even attempt will be classed as an act of war.
 
.
I have , just pointing out to you the obvious elephant in the room that you conveniently overlooked.

May I remind you that any such act, even attempt will be classed as an act of war.

As long as Pakistan remains stable, it is all good, and there is obviously no need for any such actions.
 
.
That is not what he said. He labeled it as the most unstable nuclear stockpile in the world, and the need to stabilize it, if necessary.
Sir for your information USA has dedicated units to do this. In fact they for past several years do exercises based on this scenario.
 
.
Sir for your information USA has dedicated units to do this. In fact they for past several years do exercises based on this scenario.

That is only prudent. Please note the conditions that would make such intervention necessary - instability and collapse. Of course Pakistan will never get to that point, right?
 
.
That is only prudent. Please note the conditions that would make such intervention necessary - instability and collapse. Of course Pakistan will never get to that point, right?
Sir USA congress got attacked. Will USA allow other countries to start practicing to secure its nukes in case it goes unstable. The very news of some country thinking of this would lead USA to attack or sanction that country.
 
.
Sir USA congress got attacked. Will USA allow other countries to start practicing to secure its nukes in case it goes unstable. The very news of some country thinking of this would lead USA to attack or sanction that country.

I am sure China and other major countries already have similar plans for all the nuclear armed countries. It is only prudent and understandable.
 
.
As long as Pakistan remains stable, it is all good, and there is obviously no need for any such actions.

Stability or lack of it, that is not of anyone concern. Its a prerogative of 220 million citizens of Pakistan if want to remain stable or otherwise, or even if they are bothered to change their situation within the two extremes. The nukes on the other hand are there precisely for this purpose to deter any foreign nation to take advantage and challenge Pakistan sovereignty in any shape of form, while citizens of Pakistan ponder over the best possible way.
 
.
Stability or lack of it, that is not of anyone concern. Its a prerogative of 220 million citizens of Pakistan if want to remain stable or otherwise, or even if they are bothered to change their situation within the two extremes. The nukes on the other hand are there precisely for this purpose to deter any foreign nation to take advantage and challenge Pakistan sovereignty in any shape of form, while citizens of Pakistan ponder over the best possible way.

I would respectfully disagree. Obviously, it is a direct concern for the entire world if any nuclear armed country falls into instability and chaos. As long as all members of the nuclear armed club, including Pakistan, live up to the standards required to be at that lofty level, all is well. How the Pakistani people live up to those standards, by whatever means they wish to, is entirely up to them, of course, as you point out. Nobody should interfere with that process at all, I agree. But chaos? No.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom