Nobody could not have put it better
Expect the analytical trolls of different nationalities. They all know that Chinese members will never acknowledge the conditions in China then when it was made a UNSC member in 1971 and that it voted like an American baby from then to 1989 when it was thrown out from its lap by USA due to Tiananmenn massacre. We all know how Chinese Maoists were and are yet so desperate eager to send their families to the relative safety of the West.
China was more legitimate in 1971 than India is today. China inherited veto from ROC in 1971 as legitimate successor, what does India have today? who are you inheriting your veto from? whether china was poor at 1971 or not is irrelevant, because China had veto power since 1945, doesn't matter it's nationalist government or communist government.
So let me lay out the reasons for you,
1)China was one of the big 4 allied powers during WWII, it contributed way more to the victory than India, so it was more legitimate for china to be part of P5 than India in 1945.
2)Since both communist and nationalist(ROC) are considered part of China, as recognized by UN, it is then natural for communist to succeed nationalist after ROC was expelled from UN. So there's no such thing as China got veto in 1971, it was simply passed hand internally from one Chinese government to another Chinese government in 1971.
It is then evident, that India today is still less legitimate than China was back in 1945 or 1971, Germany, Japan and even Brazil should be considered before India.
Don't be an a$$ you are talking like a Pakistani. The UN is not a Rambo movie to jump around the world firing out four barreled machine guns
So you agree that claiming that India has nothing going for it other than population is an incorrect argument? To reiterate when China got the veto in 1971, it was as poor as a church mouse and country of famine where people were selling there own children to feed themselves.
The UN was set up to prevent another world war, so far it has been successful. It is as you say a political organization. So as per you India has insufficient status? What status did China have in 1971? Or indeed what status does Russia really have today? It is an isolated country selling gas and oil at rock bottom prices to keep afloat. It is not even able at this point to protect its own legitimate interests without being sanctioned.
Can you tell me which part if the speech you found so annoying? To me the whole thing seems like normal diplomatic speak. A country works for its own best interest at several fronts at the same time. Diplomatic speeches at the UN does not mean that the indian government is not working on other fronts as well.
One last point, Germany is included in the p5+1 but not Japan, where is the fairness in that ? (Yes, I know you agree with me that the whole thing is totally biased) as far as I can see Germany is included despite two other EU nations already with veto power because they are blonde haired and blue eyed and the Japanese are not because they are black haired and slanty eyed - exactly the same reason why during WW2 German and Italian immigrants in America went about their business while Japanese were rounded up into concentration camps.
Let me repeat my above reasoning....
1)China was one of the big 4 allied powers during WWII, it contributed way more to the victory than India, so it was more legitimate for china to be part of P5 than India in 1945.
2)Since both communist and nationalist(ROC) are considered part of China, as recognized by UN, it is then natural for communist to succeed nationalist after ROC was expelled from UN. So there's no such thing as China got veto in 1971, it was simply passed hand internally from one Chinese government to another Chinese government in 1971.
3. Indian burns women alive for not bringing enough dowry, you have the largest poverty rate in the world today, you have more slaves than any other countries in the world according to World Slave Index. China was even more legitimate back in 1971 than India is today, period.
