j11b far superior to su30MKI?
smoking too much cultural revolution grade opium apparently
this is what excessive nationalism does to you. clouds your judgment and makes you retarded. saying "China can dominate the skies above New Delhi" is like saying "Taiwan can dominate the skies above Biejing" which would make more sense since they are a lot closer to each other
LOL at indian brainwashing. Look at a map. China is 200 km away from New Delhi. We are now deploying J-10B to airbases in Tibet mere hundreds of kilometers away from New Delhi. In a war, Red Fort will be destroyed right away and the entire city center will need to be bombed away. For bombing, we'll use H-6K of course.
You don’t even know the RCS figures for J-10, you are just making stories up. As for radar, what radar does the J-10B use again?
LOL at your obvious jealousy at China. J-10B has AESA, and we've just deployed it. Meanwhile, Russia hasn't deployed an AESA radar on a production fighter aircraft yet.
Nobody knows RCS figures for J-10. PLA doesn't publish these things.
You have to be kidding. The SU-30 have a combination of TVC and canards. As well as good T/W ratio; not to mention the Flanker airframe broke over 40 world records. The SU-30 is capable of 10G turns. The JF-17 is out of its league.
Canards are the weaknesses of the flankers. That's why Russia did not go for canards on the Su-35. They saw the problems on the MKI (good move by the way). China was lucky because we didn't go for the canard flanker option -- we wanted something safe. Note that we only have canards on the J-15 because it's naval and needs more lift. (Of course there is nothing wrong with canards itself, like the J-10, it's just that the flanker airframe plus canards is not ideal.)
MKI doesn't have real TVC either, but limited 2D TVC at best. Low T/W is a major problem for the MKI, it's even lower than 90's era MKK.
As for avionics in the SU-30, firstly it can not have ‘early 80’s avionics’ because the SU-30 was created in the 1990’s. Secondly, the SU-30mki cockpit is a mix of French and Israeli systems. So the joke is on you.
And the JF-17's is very limited to its small random and extremely small radar.
A huge aircraft like the MKI has a bigger radar yes, but it's also a bigger target iself on its adversary's radar!
Look at JF-17's cockpit to see the difference in avionics generation between JF-17 and MKI. I'll tell you what's really a joke -- indian attempts to integrate French and Israeli systems into a Russian aircraft
Anyone with a pair of eyes can see that you are a joke and Sweetman is a magazine editor, try pulling up some academic sources and then talk.
Now you're just being stubborn. Sweetman is a respected military expert. He has much better credentials than you -- you are some random Russian guy. He gave an expert opinion saying J-20 is a real deal stealth fighter like F-22 while PAKFA made some obvious major compromises to stealth. That is credible. Your envious, stubborn nay-saying is not.
Which Chinese aircraft in the 80s sported this kind of cockpit?
Sukhoi 30 MKI
Chinese Sukhoi-30 MK2 cockpit.
See JF-17 cockpit above. It beats both MKI and MKK.
Return of the troll .... JF-17's gonna counter MKI's N011 BARS + R-77 adders with what , eh ?
Cockpit looks don't win you wars , neither does talking rubbish without any technical info ....
LOL..... R-77 adders are nothing compared to China's SD-10A!
JF-17 has an extremely advanced KLJ-7 X-band mechanically scanned radar too. A physically large target like MKI would be easily tracked.
