Remarrying without Iddat not unlawful: LHC

[GumNaam]

They can fool the gullible high on ultra patriotism and cricket mania -------. It is what it is .

Btw how come i.k can let go a convict under court orders which he didn't even contest like it should have been but stopped a mere accused to exit the country who was also carrying the same court's orders?

Some deal went wrong?

uhm...cuz it was "court order" and all the black coated terrorists from the bar mafia would've started attacking hospitals again, ever thought of that?

 

[Mentee]

uhm...cuz it was "court order" and all the black coated terrorists from the bar mafia would've started attacking hospitals again, ever thought of that?

Whataboutism isn't what i was looking for
What about Ayub khan
What about yahya khan
What about Zia
What Musharraf
what about kiyani

 

[GumNaam]

Whataboutism isn't what i was looking for
What about Ayub khan
What about yahya khan
What about Zia
What Musharraf
what about kiyani

while you live in the past, I'm living in the present, that's all I can say.

 

[RIP Pak LAW]

Simply a woman should produce an ultrasound report in the court khalas! no need to do idaat then. In past, you don't had such technology.

 

[Salman Baig]

I guess heading is misleading and most of us are misinterpreting the news. Ex husband filed Zina case on his wife on which court mentioned " the marriage between respondents will be counter as an irregular (fasid) marriage and not void (batil) as alleged by the petitioner ".
It will still be interesting to see detail verdict on it. I

 

[GumNaam]

Simply a woman should produce an ultrasound report in the court khalas! no need to do idaat then. In past, you don't had such technology.

uhm, you will be at least 2 months (8 weeks). in most cases it's 3 months anyway and I speak from experience on account of being s father of multiple children.

 

[Kompromat]

Is this the personal opinion of the Fazil justice or his organization?

 

[Mentee]

while you live in the past, I'm living in the present, that's all I can say.

Brother that's exactly what iam saying so next time whenever the musical chair group, who accommodates only their own cult like I.k favouring navaz to fly outside the country and in return when n league comes to power the favour could be reciprocated, reveals each others audios etc for gaining politcal mileage we should ignore the minions doing ma behan ki and raise real issues like inflation, health , education law and order- ------. In khabeeso k peechay koi bayvkoof he laray ga

Is this the personal opinion of the Fazil justice or his organization?

Every judge delivers judgement based on his perception of facts and law-------. It's not like afsar sb nay kaha hai to theek he ho ga .

 

[RIP Pak LAW]

View attachment 807572

uhm, you will be at least 2 months (8 weeks). in most cases it's 3 months anyway and I speak from experience on account of being s father of multiple children.

There is a blood test which can confirm woman's pregnancy immediately as well. As early as 1-2 weeks. Gold standard.

 

[I.R.A]

If my memory serves me correctly, this judge obviously couldn't have declared sitting PM's marriage void.

This woman's case is one off, otherwise people who are assuming that three months and four months period is too much for idda and it is not in accordance with modern times .......... people use you common sense please, no decent recently divorced woman would in her right senses be able to enter another marriage as soon as she is divorced. For goodness sake leave the pregnancy out. Like seriously how can one ignore the emotional and psychological affects of a divorce, it doesn't only harm two individuals but families ........ and some here think that three months is to determine if she is pregnant or not. Akal ghass charnay gai hui hy kya?

And no decent recently widowed woman would want to marry soon after her husband's death, it may for many be a life long sorrow, Islam affords them a period of at least four months to mourn and may be after that they may be able to decide what is best for them.

And before Islam widows weren't even allowed to marry, it still happens in the biggest democracy right next to us.

 

[TNT]

What are the reasons for iddat ?

Doesn't matter what the reasons are, what matters is she have transgressed and deserves punishment for that. Simple as that. No need to find excuses by saying what r the reasons and that she did pregnancy test or whatever.
Do you think those who divorce do it instantly? And they do it till the last day? Usually couples would be separate for months before divorce, yet still Allah have put this condition.

There is a blood test which can confirm woman's pregnancy immediately as well. As early as 1-2 weeks. Gold standard.

Reasons for iddat are not just pregnancy, couples can be months without sleeping together before divorce and they would know there is no pregnancy, yet the rule applies and have applied at the time of Prophet SAW. The iddat was observed even when couple was sure about no pregnancy. These are rules ordered by Allah and its stupid to find excuses.

 

[TNT]

Simply a woman should produce an ultrasound report in the court khalas! no need to do idaat then. In past, you don't had such technology.

If u had ever bothered to read Quran and study, u wont be uttering such BS. Reason have not been given by Allah, its order of Allah. Would u then similarly find reasons for namaz and others?

 

[El Sidd]

Lol yes make one jirga or Panchayat who can handle everything from petty theft to complex tax laws
LHC made a decision - it's not the end of the world
You can challenge this decision at both supreme court and federal Shariah court

Every civillized nation have those systems in place to challenge a decision(in west where you live we have different courts for different crimes- a family court, court for renters etc etc)- only thing we do differently is that on top of all that we have a Shariah court in place that can inspect laws of Parliament and also decisions of courts in light of islamic values and either reject or accept it

Yes we all know the processes but why such instances happen? How is a chief justice of one of the most populous city court is oblivious to basic code and conduct of the living document?

Mainly for streamlining inheritance, child support and other stuff.

then it's not a personal thing now is it?

 

[El Sidd]

Simply a woman should produce an ultrasound report in the court khalas! no need to do idaat then. In past, you don't had such technology.

By the same simplistic argument, you follow a god who couldn't foresee development in science or technology.