What's new

Remarrying without Iddat not unlawful: LHC

.
This pti gov and these liberal cleanshave judges are doing and giving decisions on issues which are related to religioun while they dont even know "alif ba" of islam and its laws. They are literally playing with fire like they did couple of weeks ago with madina mosque.

I hope our ulemas come out of little sectarian issues and start concentrating on the much bigger and dirty enemy within(friends of kafirs)
 
Last edited:
.
idat was compulsory 1400 yesrs ago , now many modern medical equipment available to verify if women pregnant or not


There's always an x factor of biological probability involved in pregnancy which can't be ruled out so why take a chance ?

Kal ko jo DNA test krvaty phry gy behtar hai Sabar kr lo --anyhow a gnyecologist could better assist the court in this instance
 
.
Allah has also given technology to verify pregnancy and moral crimes should not involve the state in today's world.
negative. Pakistan is an Islamic state, Islamic law applies. moral crimes do and should carry a punishment as per the hudood ordinance. if it's not being enforced, it's due to judicial corruption which needs to be hammered out, not as per the law. this judgement will have serious riprocussions and I'm afraid that fundo parties like the tlp will capitalize on it.
 
Last edited:
.
There's always an x factor of biological probability involved in pregnancy which can't be ruled out so why take a chance ?

Kal ko jo DNA test krvaty phry gy behtar hai Sabar kr lo --anyhow a gnyecologist could better assist the court in this instance
Lamhe painde jindri choti, Ki karne ethay rahi.
 
.
What those Judges know about Islamic laws?
How are they qualified to make such decisions?
 
.
negative. Pakistan is an Islamic state, Islamic law applies. moral crimes do and should carry a punishment as per the hudood ordinance. if it's not being enforced, it's due to judicial corruption which needs to be hammered out, not as per the law. this judgement will have serious riprocussions and I'm afraid that fundo parties like the tlp will capitalize on it.

No, Pakistan is a Muslim country, moral crimes in todays world are between the sinner and Allah Almighty. The state has no right to interfere, this is the 21st century.
 
.
No, Pakistan is a Muslim country, moral crimes in todays world are between the sinner and Allah Almighty. The state has no right to interfere, this is the 21st century.
now, not gonna fly. Pakistan's constitution says that no law shall be made repugnant to the The Quran or Sunnah. That, legally, makes Pakistan an ISLAMIC country, not just a Muslim country. Islam is for all times, regardless of what century.
 
.
Allah has also given technology to verify pregnancy and moral crimes should not involve the state in today's world.
Like I said, If the purpose was only pregnancy verification, Widow wouldn’t be given an extra month (4) for iddat as compared to a divorcee (3)
 
.
Every law and court decision of Pakistan should be in line with Islamic law. It's in the constitution.
IHC own decision is illegal.
 
.
Every law and court decision of Pakistan should be in line with Islamic law. It's in the constitution.
IHC own decision is illegal.
You can challenge this decision at Shariah court afaik
 
.
Allah has also given technology to verify pregnancy and moral crimes should not involve the state in today's world.

Society decides and defines her morals.

Morality here takes a back seat to social constructs of a civil partnership. Unless mentioned exclusively in the marriage contract, law of normality shall apply over law of exceptions.
You can challenge this decision at Shariah court afaik

Why the need for multiple judicial systems? It's complicated enough with jirga, panchayat, colonial, republic, federation each claiming a legitimate niche in the empire.
 
.
Like I said, If the purpose was only pregnancy verification, Widow wouldn’t be given an extra month (4) for iddat as compared to a divorcee (3)
agreed. our so called "judiciary" needs to be forcefully taught the meaning of "same'ena wa ata'ana" (we hear and we obey) danday kay zor par. in ki itni auqaat kab say ho gayi keh Allah o Rasool PBUH ke ehkamaat par apni do takay ki third class interpretation laga'ein???

The terms of iddah are clear, there is no room for "interpretation". 3 ya 4 maheenay wait kar ley nay say koi qayamat nahi ajaa ti.
 
Last edited:
.
Are you biased or ignorant? does the government takes decisions on behalf of the courts, or do the judges make the decisions?
Learn to stay on the topic and don't go on irrelevant tangents showing your ignorance.


This pti gov and these liberal cleanshave judges are doing and giving decisions on issues which are related to religioun while they dont even know "alif ba" of islam and its laws. They are literally playing with fire like they did couple of weeks ago with madina mosque.

I hope our ulemas come out of little sectarian issues and start concentrating on the much bigger and dirty enemy within(friends of kafirs)
 
.
Boy o boy what do we have here. Another "STFU I KNOW EVERYTHING YOU KNOW NOTHING. HERE TAKE THE TICKET TO HELL" topic :coffee:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom