Reason Why Army men beaten motor way police officers?

[karakoram]

this retard captain should be court martial immediately bunch of losers are giving bad name to our army

 

[HttpError]

In Pakistan the reality is "Might is Right" Jis ki lathi us ki behains.

 

[AsifIjaz]

wow... so many comments have been posted spreading over a few threads which state that the army men should be stripped of their ranks, they are a disgrace to the institution... etc etc

firstly: Why are we taking sides... how are ppl so sure that motorway police or army men were innocent

secondly: no matter which side of the story you believe, one thing is for sure that no one would back down from blatant insult and humiliation. Both got angry and acted out of shear anger.

Lastly: just like all of us, both motorway police personnel and army personnel are renowned for taking sides of their people. Its like a tradition. No matter who is at fault we would take side based upon our belief which is based upon nothing but our thinking and imagination.
This is the root cause of this problem and not the other way around.

 

[VCheng]

they are a disgrace to the institution

Actually, conduct unbecoming an officer is a disgrace to the institution.

 

[AsifIjaz]

Actually, conduct unbecoming an officer is a disgrace to the institution.

Absolutely..... an officer in uniform using abusive language / beating up another human being or harassing him is a disgrace to the uniform.
The uniform can be that of the armed forces or law enforcing agencies... that makes no difference. An offence is an offence.

 

[VCheng]

Absolutely..... an officer in uniform using abusive language / beating up another human being or harassing him is a disgrace to the uniform.
The uniform can be that of the armed forces or law enforcing agencies... that makes no difference. An offence is an offence.

If the lawbreaker had accepted the speeding ticket, there would have been no issue at all. The lawbreaker tried to pull rank and expected to be let off for not only speeding, but trying to evade police. The lawbreaker is at fault. Clearly.

 

[AsifIjaz]

If the lawbreaker had accepted the speeding ticket, there would have been no issue at all. The lawbreaker tried to pull rank and expected to be let off for not only speeding, but trying to evade police. The lawbreaker is at fault. Clearly.

may be you are right... but may be you are wrong.
is what you wrote based upon anything other than the way you look at things and your assumptions????

I repeat, please lets not take sides right away... wait for the investigation to end first.

 

[VCheng]

may be you are right... but may be you are wrong.
is what you wrote based upon anything other than the way you look at things and your assumptions????

I repeat, please lets not take sides right away... wait for the investigation to end first.

I am not taking any sides. The basic issue started with breaking the law, and then trying to avoid being fined for it. The investigation can only start from here. How far it goes depends on what sort of justice is desired.

 

[Finer]

I find it hard to believe Motorway police would dare to challenge Army man. Anyone within in right mind would avoid challenging Army man. Something is not right. Better wait until we hear the other side too.

 

[AsifIjaz]

No one knows whether they tried to avoid being fined or not. It's anybody's guess as to what happened there. I can make a dozen scenarios as well. There is only one sort of justice and that is blind. The rest is nothing more than an eye wash

 

[VCheng]

No one knows whether they tried to avoid being fined or not. It's anybody's guess as to what happened there. I can make a dozen scenarios as well. There is only one sort of justice and that is blind. The rest is nothing more than an eye wash

Trying to defend illegal behavior will never work. ISPR may decide to defuse the situation with an official eyewash and not provide the justice it has promised, but that is the typically Pakistani way.

One thing is clear: These army officers involved in the entire incident simply do not have the discipline necessary to be trusted with firearms. Ever. There is enough evidence showing that already. Now whether they are taken to task for this or not is quite another matter. Justice? In Pakistan? Let's wait and see.

I find it hard to believe Motorway police would dare to challenge Army man. Anyone within in right mind would avoid challenging Army man. Something is not right. Better wait until we hear the other side too.

Enforcing the speed limit is not a challenge to anyone. It is their assigned duty.

 

[Finer]

Trying to defend illegal behavior will never work. ISPR may decide to defuse the situation with an official eyewash and not provide the justice it has promised, but that is the typically Pakistani way.

One thing is clear: These army officers involved in the entire incident simply do not have the discipline necessary to be trusted with firearms. Ever. There is enough evidence showing that already. Now whether they are taken to task for this or not is quite another matter. Justice? In Pakistan? Let's wait and see.



Enforcing the speed limit is not a challenge to anyone. It is their assigned duty.

Which is why one-sided narrative remains questionable. Best to wait for other side of the story.

 

[VCheng]

Which is why one-sided narrative remains questionable. Best to wait for other side of the story.

The fact that no speeding tickets have been issued speaks loudly. When the car tried to evade police after speeding, there was no way the police would know who was driving the offending vehicle. Until that point, the offences had already been committed by the army officer. What happened after that only compounded the conduct unbecoming. What the QRF did is even worse by aiding and abetting criminals.

There is nothing one sided about the above.

 

[Finer]

The fact that no speeding tickets have been issued speaks loudly. When the car tried to evade police after speeding, there was no way the police would know who was driving the offending vehicle. Until that point, the offences had already been committed by the army officer. What happened after that only compounded the conduct unbecoming. What the QRF did is even worse by aiding and abetting criminals.

There is nothing one sided about the above.

When i said one-sided, i meant the narrative from Army. I have yet to hear from Motorway Police. Judging by assessment, it is fairly to assume who is guilty party but let's reserve the judgement until we hear both side of narratives as well as the investigation completes its process.

 

[VCheng]

When i said one-sided, i meant the narrative from Army. I have yet to hear from Motorway Police. Judging by assessment, it is fairly to assume who is guilty party but let's reserve the judgement until we hear both side of narratives as well as the investigation completes its process.

The police lay out their side in the charge sheet quite clearly. Those are serious charges indeed. Let's see what the formal due process concludes and what justice is provided.