American Eagle
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- May 25, 2010
- Messages
- 3,288
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
An awful lot of words being thrown into the mix here when the facts and requirements of International Law are simple and the same in all, repeat all, nations, not just in the US or Pakistan:
1. Mr. Davis has Diplomtic Immunity from the US Embasy in Islamabad.
2. He has been illegally arrested and detached as no, repeat no, court of local jurisdiction nor any other court in Pakistan can supercede Internation Law...Diplomatic Immunity.
There are some real "tales" in this overlong Thread which if woven togethere create a montage of a spy thriller that might be published by a Pakistani or even an American paperback publishers.
Meanwhile, Mr. Davis faced attempted robbery, defended himself, and is entitled and does and has had since this tour of duty in Pakistan and through June 2012...has Diplomatic Immunity.
Try focusing on the robbers, the stolen items, being many, on their persons when the Police checked them out.
No one is saying here that anyone's death is a welcome or wanted thing. The death outcome for the two robbers is unfortunte. But, it is hard to define the two robbers as honorable and innocent citizens when you go over the long list of stolen items in their possession at the time of this most unfortunate event.
Cart before the horse says you start and end with Diplomatic Immunity.
To keep ruminating otherwise is wasting time. The people of Pakistan need all help possible from the USA from the level of a sweeper up to the fanciest stake holders in Pakistani society. As this was attempted robbery you have to settle for diplomatic immunity for the put upon Mr. Davis.
1. Mr. Davis has Diplomtic Immunity from the US Embasy in Islamabad.
2. He has been illegally arrested and detached as no, repeat no, court of local jurisdiction nor any other court in Pakistan can supercede Internation Law...Diplomatic Immunity.
There are some real "tales" in this overlong Thread which if woven togethere create a montage of a spy thriller that might be published by a Pakistani or even an American paperback publishers.
Meanwhile, Mr. Davis faced attempted robbery, defended himself, and is entitled and does and has had since this tour of duty in Pakistan and through June 2012...has Diplomatic Immunity.
Try focusing on the robbers, the stolen items, being many, on their persons when the Police checked them out.
No one is saying here that anyone's death is a welcome or wanted thing. The death outcome for the two robbers is unfortunte. But, it is hard to define the two robbers as honorable and innocent citizens when you go over the long list of stolen items in their possession at the time of this most unfortunate event.
Cart before the horse says you start and end with Diplomatic Immunity.
To keep ruminating otherwise is wasting time. The people of Pakistan need all help possible from the USA from the level of a sweeper up to the fanciest stake holders in Pakistani society. As this was attempted robbery you have to settle for diplomatic immunity for the put upon Mr. Davis.