What's new

Ravana was a dalit from Ghaziabad: BJP leader Subramanian Swamy

I think here it Mr Swamy is trying to say that dalits can reach to the level of Brahmins even during this era and giving that example by talking about Ravana and Mandodari. Praveen Togadia claimed that all are Hindus and now Mr Swamy said that Ravana was Dalit.

But the main thing which Mr Swamy is saying is to change the education system

Replace history books written by Britishers: Swamy - The Times of India
really??? or may be he is trying to say Dalit was killed by Hindus or Dalits are evil. .
 
.
Ravana is a Brahmin.... Swamy is smoking too much nowadays..

Wrong reporting by crappy TOI, as usual, complete hit job.

Even refer to this recent speech (last month, and other older ones ) by Swamy

Goto 23 minutes, where he talks about Ravana,.

subramanian%20swamy%20toi%203.png
 
Last edited:
.
So Ram setu must be true also. It can be a lost history. But not religious for that people will do violence.
Gita is a part of Mahabharata but British composed it as a separate book.

আনন্দবাজার - সম্পাদকীয় - ‘জাতীয় গ্রন্থ’ ঘোষণার আগে গীতার রহস্য একটু জেনে নিলে ভাল হয়

'Must be true' is a strong word that needs more concrete evidence, but we can say it 'can be true'. Thousands of yers ago we had more land that went under the sea with the rise of the sea level, probably the distance of lands between India and Sri Lanka were far less than today with a shallow sea bed that could be bridged by a stone bridge. Google earth view of that area looks interesting.

And it is true that Ramayana and Mahabharata are not religious books of Hinduism. And violence is not justified under any circumstances.

Btw, you also read Anandabazar Patrika???
 
.
'Must be true' is a strong word that needs more concrete evidence, but we can say it 'can be true'. Thousands of yers ago we had more land that went under the sea with the rise of the sea level, probably the distance of lands between India and Sri Lanka were far less than today with a shallow sea bed that could be bridged by a stone bridge. Google earth view of that area looks interesting.

And it is true that Ramayana and Mahabharata are not religious books of Hinduism. And violence is not justified under any circumstances.

Btw, you also read Anandabazar Patrika???
It is geologically proven that increasing sea levels have separated the landmass of Sri Lanka from India.
 
.
Tumhari poori Mallu Khaandaan comes to our state for Employment! WHAT A FUC*KIN SHAME!
Have some SHAME ATLEaST NOW?
You do realize that 20% of Bangaloreans are immigrant TELEGU workers??..10% of Tamilnadu population are TELEGU immigrants(apart from those ethnic telegus living in madras and some other northern border Tamilnadu districts,all others are immigrants).If you have all these employment opportunities in andra,why are you coming to those places then??..Don't you have ANY shame??
 
. . . .
Such a level of stupidity from swamy now a days.Ravana was a Brahmin
Was BJP elected for fixing the Indian economy or bringing up religious issues and ancient Indian achievements. Are all these religious storyline a cover in case Modi fail to deliver his economic promises? This kind of distraction happens with governments not confident with the economic solutions.
Modi eill move forward with his policy of development and prosperity.The guy in dont even have a MP post.
So who gives a shit about swamy.
 
. .
I dont read regularly but its quite popular in BD to get news of other side of border

Here is the link regarding Ram Setu :D
'Ramayana no basis for Ram Setu debate' - Hindustan Times

The link just says that there id no historical or scientific proof of Ram Setu, which is already known to us, it can't be proved now, that's why Ramayana and Mahabharata are mythologies, not history. However, there is reasonable amount of possobility that those mythologies are based on some real events.
 
. .
The link just says that there id no historical or scientific proof of Ram Setu, which is already known to us, it can't be proved now, that's why Ramayana and Mahabharata are mythologies, not history. However, there is reasonable amount of possobility that those mythologies are based on some real events.

Since when religion become Myth ? I dont think that the faith which millions of Hindus are having is based on some Myth.

Such a level of stupidity from swamy now a days.Ravana was a Brahmin
Modi eill move forward with his policy of development and prosperity.The guy in dont even have a MP post.
So who gives a shit about swamy.

Ravana was Shiv Bhakt . Yes even i have read that he was Brahmin.


Divine intervention: Members of Archaka, Brahmin and Employees' JAC performing a ‘Vijaya Ganapathi homam' demanding separate Telangana in Nalgonda on Tuesday. – Photo: Singam Venkatramana
NGVNHHI-W150_GN72CD_497869e.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
And it is true that Ramayana and Mahabharata are not religious books of Hinduism. And violence is not justified under any circumstances.

Of course Ramayana and Mahabharata are sacred religious books of Hinduism.

Hinduism has "itihasa" and "puranas" as part of their tradition and both Mahabharata and Ramayana comes under itihasa.

Second, Violence is justified under certain circumstances. That is what the books are all about. It is justified when you fight against Adharma. Only, its the last resort. Not the first.
 
.
Of course Ramayana and Mahabharata are sacred religious books of Hinduism.

Hinduism has "itihasa" and "puranas" as part of their tradition and both Mahabharata and Ramayana comes under itihasa.

Second, Violence is justified under certain circumstances. That is what the books are all about. It is justified when you fight against Adharma. Only, its the last resort. Not the first.

Of India.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom