What's new

Rashid vows action within 72 hours for speaking against Pakistan Army, state institutions

Was that meant to be some sort of comeback? Instead of quoting it at me, maybe you should read Article 19 within that same link::




"Reasonable restrictions" can be death threats and incitement as we've already agreed, but simply insulting serving PM on twitter, or calling Nawaz or Zardari corrupt chors. Or criticising a state institution or the army, these are not unreasonable, let alone criminal.
Can be death threats ?🙄 and no one is stopping you from doing all that you listed and I am not here to present "comebacks".. I am just trying to put view of the other side..
 
.
As I said insulting and death threats are not criticism

Insulting political speech is not illegal, death threats are. :rolleyes1:
For the nth time, pls get with the programme:

there's a line drawn in most civilised democracies about what counts as criticism as defined and protected by the constitution, and what's actually punishable and carries a legal penalty.
This is ought to be illegal and incitement of violence. No question, I already alluded to what I'm defending and what I'm not defending:
Two points, first decouple insults and death threats. These are completely different. One isn't illegal speech
"Reasonable restrictions" can be death threats and incitement as we've already agreed, but simply insulting ..... these are not unreasonable, let alone criminal.

I'm getting tired of repeating myself, I won't bother responding to any more strawmans from you or attempts to conflate insults and death threats, after your insults in political speech being illegal shtick failed.
Can be death threats ?🙄 and no one is stopping you from doing all that you listed and I am not here to present "comebacks".. I am just trying to put view of the other side..
Your other side is wrong and baseless.
 
.
why don't you copy paste the exact declared policy of the government in each regard.

i don't have to entertain your youtube patriotism
Lmao Copy paste ? Aap ko parchi pe na likh du bahi ? Go and do your own f*cking research..
Your other side is wrong and baseless.
Lmao I can say that regarding your side but bahi your whole arguement based in just "criticism should be allowed" when we are talking about insults/death treats to be stopped, is right innit ?
 
.
Lmao Copy paste ? Aap ko parchi pe na likh du bahi ? Go and do your own f*cking research..

i assumed that government rolled out definite policies which you support the government for wholeheartedly.

however your response is no different than ministers who regularly ask people to google their statements.
 
.
i assumed that government rolled out definite policies which you support the government for wholeheartedly.

however your response is no different than ministers who regularly ask people to google their statements.
Lmao I am talking on what I have seen done... we had a PM who didnt even have a foreign minister let alone foreign policy..
 
. .
Rashid vows action within 72 hours for speaking against Pakistan Army, state institutions
Dawn.com | Naveed Siddiqui Updated 02 Jan 2021

Sheikh Rashid speaks to the media in Rawalpindi on Saturday. — DawnNewsTV

Sheikh Rashid speaks to the media in Rawalpindi on Saturday. — DawnNewsTV
Minister for Interior Sheikh Rashid Ahmed on Saturday vowed that action would be initiated within 72 hours against anyone found using derogatory language against the Pakistan Army and state institutions.
Rashid's remarks, made while speaking to reporters in Rawalpindi, come a day after Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman said that the opposition's movement would no longer be directed only at the government but also against it's "backers".
Rehman had also stated that the alliance's possible long march to the capital "could also be to Rawalpindi". He had also said that the opposition will participate in the upcoming by-elections, but indicated that there had been no decision on contesting the Senate elections.
In today's press conference, the interior minister said that the PDM has "accepted defeat" because of its decision to contest the upcoming by-elections.
He welcomed the development as "good news", adding that no "political stage should be left vacant". Rashid said he was vindicated since he maintained the PDM would contest the elections and now "there are no resignations [...] they're not boycotting the by-elections elections nor are they boycotting the Senate polls".
Elaborating on the government's response to the PDM's long march, he said the government is ready to welcome them. He said the government does not plan to trouble anyone and will respond in kind to the PDM's actions so "democracy, [the] Constitution and the law" are not besmirched.
Addressing the problems in acquiring visas, the interior minister said that people used to face corruption in acquiring Chinese and Afghan visas. To address the issue, Rashid said the facility of online visas would be introduced.
"Manual visas have been finished and 192 countries have been converted to [the system] of online visas," said Rashid. He further mentioned that 200,000 online visa applications were registered in a day, adding that overseas Pakistanis can contact the interior ministry for complaints.
He also confirmed that the passport of PML-N supreme Nawaz Sharif would not be extended upon its expiry on Feb 16.
'Govt will not resign'
Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi on Saturday reiterated that the PTI-led government would not resign, despite the opposition's demands.
In a statement, he said: "Why is the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) waiting for Jan 31? We will not resign [if they tell us to] or under pressure. Prime Minister Imran Khan has the confidence of the Parliament, why would he resign on their demand?"
The public has lost interest in the PDM's narrative, he said, adding that the "five-hours" long meeting of the 11-party opposition alliance on Friday had been "inconclusive".
"They extended the decisions made by the Central Executive Committee of the PPP. Like the PPP, they also announced that they will take part in by-elections. They are saying they will decide [whether to take part] in Senate elections when the time comes but I am saying today that they will also take part in them," he said.
In his statement, Qureshi said that institutions have "always fulfilled their responsibility according to the Constitution and the law" and "nothing would come from trying to pressure them". "We are not worried about the PDM's protest. Those who are in need themselves, what will they protest?" he questioned.
People won’t pay heed to PDM protest plans: PM
On Friday, Prime Minister Imran Khan said people will pay no heed to the PDM's call for a ‘long march’ and rejected the opposition’s allegation of a ‘puppet’ premier, arguing that if it was true why he did not hold talks with them even after the military leadership had asked him to do so in order to end political instability.
In his first interview of the year with Dunya TV, PM Imran made it clear that Pakistan Army was his subordinate institution just as the bureaucracy was.
While reiterating that he would never give any National Reconciliation Ordinance-like relief to the opposition leaders facing corruption references, the PM said: “Pakistani nation takes to streets only against corruption and for their genuine rights, but this time they know PDM leaders are planning the long march only to save their ill-gotten money.”
Asked about the opposition’s one-month deadline before holding a long march against his government, the prime minister said: “I can give in writing that Pakistani nation will not come out on the streets on the call of PDM.”
Responding to another question, he said: “If I am a puppet and if the army has asked me to hold talks with the opposition then why I am not doing so.”
He said if he was a puppet, why he was not making any compromise on the manifesto of ruling PTI. “The fact is that army stands by me in implementation of my government’s manifesto. Army wants stability and progress of the country and that is why it is with me,” he said, adding that the government did not interfere in the affairs of state institutions including the army.
“I am ready to hold negotiations with opposition on important national issues. I am ready to talk but I will commit treason if I give NRO to the opposition. Whatever they (opposition) will do, I will not give them NRO,” the premier had declared.
---
PM Imran Khan made excellent choice making Sheikh Rashid as Interior Minister at the right moment.

@Horus @waz @Zibago @Areesh @PaklovesTurkiye @Zarvan @AgNoStiC MuSliM @El Sidd @Jungibaaz @Syed1. @FOOLS_NIGHTMARE @muhammadhafeezmalik @BlueWhales @BATMAN @Path-Finder @koolio @Morpheus

some serious new yrs fireworks going on , in sheikhs backyard.........

the smokes comming out from his ears,
some one loaded the wrong app , i suppose!
 
.
Lmao I can say that regarding your side but bahi your whole arguement based in just "criticism should be allowed" when we are talking about insults/death treats to be stopped, is right innit ?
Lol, sure, just don't make weird conflations in an attempt to cover for a lost argument.
Lmao Copy paste ? Aap ko parchi pe na likh du bahi ? Go and do your own f*cking research..
Ouch, pls relax. Otherwise by your own warped reading of constitutional law and public order offences code, the part in bold might be illegal and may even be misinterpreted as a death threat. :D
 
.
Lol, sure, just don't make weird conflations in an attempt to cover for a lost argument.

Ouch, pls relax. Otherwise by your own warped reading of constitutional law and public order offences code, the part in bold might be illegal and may even be misinterpreted as a death threat. :D
I aint covering up any thing and bhens k age been bja raha hu clearly is a lost arguement... what can I say 🤷.. All I said was Insults and Death Threats are not equal but you take to "Criticism should be allowed" everytime 😆

And I used "*" for a reason... escape clauses 🤣
 
.
No UK politician has ever robbed the UK like nawaz-not-so-sharif and the zardari/bhutto axis have robbed and attempted to destroy Pakistan.

because in UK, FACESES dont matter,
only institutions do.

every one gets its powers , and also the limits,
1 biscuit more with tea !! will cost you ,... Sayeeda Hussain Warsi, ! gujjarkhan

while in pakistan u become celebrity for 1$$$$$$$millions
•ᴀʏʏᴀɴ ᴀʟɪ• gujjar khan.
 
. .
Can you call for murder of 220 generals on Prime Time TV and get away with freedom of speech card?
That is too much to the extreme, only a few examples can be made from all walks of life.
action would be initiated within 72 hours against anyone found using derogatory language against the Pakistan Army and state institutions.
Among a few dozens here are a few examples.

Brother @Norwegian please do not ask my views on the childish and petty politics of Pakistan. It's a complete waste of time and energy. Thanks
 
Last edited:
.
PAKISTAN has a foreign policy... a foreign minister and an advisor like Moeed Yusuf who has been doing great stuff.. and lastly Pakistan is standing up for itself..

Why don't you point out the great stuff, awesome things and wonderful steps?

From surrendering to Indian designs for Kashmir to sabotaging CPEC under guise of accountability, America's last stand in Pakistan is pathetically weak and an ominous sign of dying empire.

All you have to show is friendship with Sidhu and inferiority to the Persians while rest of the world pick and choose their means of plunder.

Keep putting people like S. Rashid on such places. You will soon be facing armed rebellions which neither the police nor the armed forces will save you from.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom