Rangers reciprocate Indian firing at LoC killing 5 soldiers

[Icarus]

We're not trying to open another front, can't say the same for the Indians, not at liberty to talk about this in much detail.

 

[Armstrong]

We're not trying to open another front, can't say the same for the Indians, not at liberty to talk about this in much detail.

Such cryptic talk !

 

[ares]

So you are a liar too other than being an arse. Here is where you were asking me not to use Indian source to report Indian casualties since I don't trust and accept Indian military fed reports of Pakistani casualties reported in Indian media. Here is where you came up with this weird logic:

Indian aggression at LOC | Page 64

You not only proved that you have inability understand simple english, also that you are a complete moron ( an assrash if i may).

Wasn't it a few days ago when you were asking me not to report Indian casualties from Indian media?

here is what I had said.

it is not like ..if a news piece to your liking you will trust it..whereas ignore the other unfavorable news coming out of the same source.

In here, where have I asked you not to report the casualties from Indian media?, on the other hand I am asking you not to nitpick, and not to be intellectually dishonest!! If you are going to present, then present the whole picture!!

And now in this thread you also don't agree with Pakistani claim of 5 Indian casualties and thanking a bharati who is calling it fake propaganda. Whatever happened to your face saving rule of sticking to one source. Behaving like an arse. like always??

I do not agree, because I don't trust "Dunya news". I won't be reporting Pakistani casualties from it either. IS this concept of "trust" so hard for you to understand.

But then again, hoping you would understand simple english might be a stretch, I am surprised with your IQ levels, you can even type ,without drooling all over your keyboard and shorting out the keys.

No since it is about Indian casualties I would trust NDTV or Hindustan times over this one for Indian casualties. Even though I hope this many soldiers die from your side.

You should have asked a more difficult question from me.
point clear.

This is first time, you have stuck by your word, I appreciate that..but that might be because you were backed into a corner. And Since NDTV or Hindustan Times are not reporting it, this news for all intents and purposes is false(as per your own logic) ..so kudos.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Give BSF Dhanush for trials.

 

[Areesh]

You not only proved that you have inability understand simple english, also that you are a complete moron ( an assrash if i may).

I perfectly understood what you said. Now don't bring forward this English comprehension BS here to hide your hypocrisy and double face. You were quite clear when you asked me not to quote from Indian sources for Indian casualties. You moronically and senselessly asked me not to report Indian casualties from Indian source since I don't believe in the Indian military supported Pakistani casualties reported by Indian media. Despite the fact that this something which an imbecile like you or other Indians can come up with. Here you are supporting a monkey from your country for calling Pakistani news about Indian casualties as fake while reporting Pakistani civilian casualties from the same source. What happened to your rule of sticking of one source. Why not come forward and accept that 5 Indian soldiers have been killed by Pakistan instead of supporting another bharati as$ on calling it a fake. Nearly all the Pakistani newspapers are saying that 5 Indian soldier were killed in our firing. why not come forward and accept that your forces are violating ceasefire since all the news papers here in Pakistan report that.

I however is sticking to my original position and it is working fine for me. Your logic that you used for face saving isn't even saving you(arse).

In here, where have I asked you not to report the casualties from Indian media?, on the other hand I am asking you not to nitpick, and not to be intellectually dishonest!! If you are going to present, then present the whole picture!!

Explained above. You had problems which were quite moronic that why I am using Indian sources for Indian casualties and not accepting Indians sources for Pakistani casualties while doing contrary when it comes to Pakistani casualties and Pakistani claims of Indian casualties.

This is not dishonesty, this is the only right right way to handle casualties in such incidents. It is you and other Indian who cooked up a new strategy to save face despite what is happening at LOC and IB with your superman Modi in power.

I won't be reporting Pakistani casualties from it either.

You are using Pakistani sources to report Pakistan civilian casualties continuously despite the threads where you post those reports are not about Pakistani casualties. But then you behave as a total as$ when the same Pakistani sources report Indian casualties.

But then again, hoping you would understand simple english might be a stretch, I am surprised with your IQ levels, you can even type ,without drooling all over your keyboard and shorting out the keys.

It is funny Indian talking about IQ. What next. You are going to lecture us about modesity and not to do anything like rapes.

This is first time, you have stuck by your word, I appreciate that..but that might be because you were backed into a corner. And Since NDTV or Hindustan Times are not reporting it, this news for all intents and purposes is false(as per your own logic) ..so kudos.

I was pushed anywhere. It was very easy for me since I am not saving my ego like you guys. My soldiers are doing their duty well which is good enough for me.

Give BSF Dhanush for trials.

But then who save BSF from response to any Dhanush?

 

[Water Car Engineer]

But then who save BSF from response to any Dhanush?

More Dhanush.

 

[Areesh]

More Dhanush.

But to whom you would give more Dhanush since BSF would be history by then?

 

[Water Car Engineer]

But to whom you would give more Dhanush since BSF would be history by then?

Oh no, India has money to burn and the man power. Can play this game quite well, dont worry. You just worry about matching it, when it gets serious.

 

[Areesh]

Oh no, India has money to burn and the man power. Can play this game quite well, dont worry. You just worry about matching it, when it gets serious.

No manpower is big enough for modern missiles.

 

[Icewolf]

Pakistan Rangers not accepting protest notes over ceasefire: BSF

Note the change of tone from India!

Hahahahahahahahah

 

[Water Car Engineer]

No manpower is big enough for modern missiles.

But who has more missiles to burn and recuperate?

Launch a missile. No problem launching back Brahmoses and Shauryas in response.

 

[ares]

I perfectly understood what you said. Now don't bring forward this English comprehension BS here to hide your hypocrisy and double face. You were quite clear when you asked me not to quote from Indian sources for Indian casualties. You moronically and senselessly asked me not to report Indian casualties from Indian source since I don't believe in the Indian military supported Pakistani casualties reported by Indian media. Despite the fact that this something which an imbecile like you or other Indians can come up with. Here you are supporting a monkey from your country for calling Pakistani news about Indian casualties as fake while reporting Pakistani civilian casualties from the same source. What happened to your rule of sticking of one source. Why not come forward and accept that 5 Indian soldiers have been killed by Pakistan instead of supporting another bharati as$ on calling it a fake. Nearly all the Pakistani newspapers are saying that 5 Indian soldier were killed in our firing. why not come forward and accept that your forces are violating ceasefire since all the news papers here in Pakistan report that.

I have asked you many times now..show me where I have asked you too" not to quote from Indian sources for Indian casualties."
IF you can not comprehend, what is clearly very simple English, it is not my problem, you should take it up with your madrassa teachers !!

I however is sticking to my original position and it is working fine for me. Your logic that you used for face saving isn't even saving you(arse).

Would not need face saving from likes of you!!

Explained above. You had problems which were quite moronic that why I am using Indian sources for Indian casualties and not accepting Indians sources for Pakistani casualties while doing contrary when it comes to Pakistani casualties and Pakistani claims of Indian casualties.

This is not dishonesty, this is the only right right way to handle casualties in such incidents. It is you and other Indian who cooked up a new strategy to save face despite what is happening at LOC and IB with your superman Modi in power.

Again this your comprehension problem, not what I said, go read, and reread it, perhaps you by grace of God will understand it..though I have my doubts.

You are using Pakistani sources to report Pakistan civilian casualties continuously despite the threads where you post those reports are not about Pakistani casualties. But then you behave as a total as$ when the same Pakistani sources report Indian casualties.

Again..how many times I have told you, I am reporting from Pakistani sources I trust..show me where I have quoted from Dunya news to give Pakistani numbers!!

It is funny Indian talking about IQ. What next. You are going to lecture us about modesity and not to do anything like rapes.

Well I am talking about your IQ, not IQ of an average Pakistani..from what I have red, you IQ hardly seems more than you age.

I was pushed anywhere. It was very easy for me since I am not saving my ego like you guys. My soldiers are doing their duty well which is good enough for me.

Good for you.

 

[rockstarIN]

What putrid pile of rubbish, totally erroneous and filled with your bias.. I wonder if you actually believe your own BS?!.. It wouldn't amaze me, given than you're indian and you people inherently suffer from delusions of grandeur, coupled with Tourette's syndrome. Not a healthy combination.

putrid pile
rubbish
erroneous
bias
BS
delusions of grandeur
Tourette's syndrome

There is nothing in your post to counter my argument except the above shyt words in your post. and what else, thanked by two TTs. wow, such a thoughtful and insightful post to attract the attention of such think tanks!
(And you are a newbie with U.S flags!)

 

[acid rain]

Looks like pakistanis came up with bs and lies again Just like lying about John kerry statement about aid.

Firing on civilians and hoping to Allah it hits a couple of soldiers who are involved in rescuing efforts.

 

[SledgeHammer]

@Icarus - Janaab zaraa pataa tou karvaiiin what in heaven's name is happening on the borders ?

It wouldn't make any sense for us to start hostilities seeing that we've got Zarb-e-Azb going on one hand, we're cleaning up the last remnants of separatism in Baluchistan, we've got Intelligence lead operations being conducted in the country (according to DG ISPR) and we've got some friction with the Iranians on our borders with them; we'd have to me exceptionally stupid to open up another front.

What are the Indians up to then ?

I'd ask @Xeric but abbb woh lift hi nahin karvateiii !

The question should be what Pakistan is up to? And the answer is; Pakistan is trying to force India to resume talks that India has suspended over the issue of Pakistani high commission in Delhi holding meetings with separatists ignoring Indian government's objection. If the dialogue is resumed, then Pakistan can carry on with their proxy war against India while projecting itself as a responsible and peaceloving country willing to solve the disputes through dialogue. All the talks so far have resulted in nothing because of these double standards.

 

[Areesh]

But who has more missiles to burn and recuperate?

Launch a missile. No problem launching back Brahmoses and Shauryas in response.

You won't need more missiles when you are already a part of history. To fire a missile you need to be alive you know.