What's new

Protests erupt as VHP’s Ram Rajya rath yatra enters Tamil Nadu

.
if you have studied your Hindu mythologies you wouldnt be posing that silly question to me

check Srimad Bhagavatam canto 9.1.2-3

Stop sounding like Zakir Naik....Chapter 5 verse 12 stanza 23..

2 + 2 = 5 logics don't work..
 
.
hate to burst your bubble, in fact is Northie god Rama is a dravidian Tamil , the ones who should be having the last laugh should be Tamils :rofl::rofl::rofl:


:cheesy: This is epic!!!!

Lord Ram is a Tamil!!!

You know we will more then Happy, and will distribute Sweets if Really Tamils claim Lord Ram a Tamilian.

We seriously want this to happen.

Lord Ram the God of Tamils.

If this happens then what the divide of North Indian and South Indians.

We the North Indians hole heartedly support Tamilians claiming descendancy from Lord Ram.

Jai Shree Raam!!!!!
 
.
lol.... what about Ramayana ? :cheesy:

Stop confusing the poor Vatican fellow.
He already linked Ravan to Bhavatam...Looks like the Vatican mafia is not giving accurate information.:D

We the North Indians hole heartedly support Tamilians claiming decadency from Lord Ram.

He actually thinks we will love Bhagawan Ram less if he is from South.
Perhaps he does not remember Adi Sankaracharya, the Adi guru who happens to a Malayali.

The Vatican mafia is fast loosing it's narrative in south.
 
.
:cheesy: This is epic!!!!

Lord Ram is a Tamil!!!

You know we will more then Happy, and will distribute Sweets if Really Tamils claim Lord Ram a Tamilian.

We seriously want this to happen.

Lord Ram the God of Tamils.

If this happens then what the divide of North Indian and South Indians.

We the North Indians hole heartedly support Tamilians claiming descendancy from Lord Ram.

Jai Shree Raam!!!!!

Technically he is right.

Iksvasu was the son Dravida king Sukhedeva. And Sri Ramchandraji was born in the Iksvasu clan.

Stop confusing the poor Vatican fellow.
He already linked Ravan to Bhavatam...Looks like the Vatican mafia is not giving accurate information.:D

He actually thinks we will love Bhagawan Ram less if he is from South.
Perhaps he does not remember Adi Sankaracharya, the Adi guru who happens to a Malayali.

The Vatican mafia is fast loosing it's narrative in south.

I think he is like the ABCD. Confused.
 
.
Looks like resentment about routing of Ravana - that too with the help of traitor terrorists like Bibhishana - still resonates among the Dravidian folks...
 
.
Stop confusing the poor Vatican fellow.
He already linked Ravan to Bhavatam...Looks like the Vatican mafia is not giving accurate information.:D



He actually thinks we will love Bhagawan Ram less if he is from South.
Perhaps he does not remember Adi Sankaracharya, the Adi guru who happens to a Malayali.

The Vatican mafia is fast loosing it's narrative in south.

He is a fool. Living in hallucination.

He dont know about the Sanatan Dharma and Actual Culture of India.

He dont know that, It was His Holi Jagadguru Shankaracharya. Who culturally united whole of India.

Only a South Indian Can become Head of Badrinath Peeth, Only a North Indian can become Head of Shringeri Peet in South, Only a West Indian Can become Head of Puri Peeth in the East, and East Indian can become Head in the Dwarka Peeth in the West.

Let him live in his cocoon, who cares.
 
.
Looks like resentment about routing of Ravana - that too with the help of traitor terrorists like Bibhishana - still resonates among the Dravidian folks...

Then he should demand the name of "RAMeshwaram" in Tamil Nadu, be changed to "Ravaneshwaram" :lol:
 
Last edited:
.
Technically he is right.
Iksvasu was the son Dravida king Sukhedeva. And Sri Ramchandraji was born in the Iksvasu clan.
I think he is like the ABCD. Confused.

No you are confused with some other reference.

Descendancy goes like this

From Lord Brahma> Rishi Maarichi > Rishi Kashyapa > Rishi Visvana > Rishi Manu (Manu Smriti) > Ikshwaku (Forefather of Lord Ram) >>>>>>>>> Lord Ram.
 
Last edited:
.
Fact remains that this Yatra will attract crores of Hindus waiting for a chance to choose a Hindu party.

2019 will be a water shed moment for Tamil people. They will finally get a chance to kick Perriyar to the curb and elect a Hindu govt to look after them.

if BJP wants to get elected they will have to focus on bread and butter issues
just a thought

Tamils are not Hindus and Ram isnt their god . He was a wife deserter (which is against Tamil cultural value) , was responsible for the genocide of Eelam Tamils and killing Ravan a Tamil hero. Please keep him within the borders of cow belt region as he is the inspiration for hate mongers

th

tamil are not Hindus ??
ravana a tamil hero ??
 
.
No you are confused with some other reference.

Descendancy goes like this

From Lord Brahma> Rishi Maarichi > Rishi Kashyapa > Rishi Visvana > Rishi Manu (Manu Smiriti) > Ikshwaku (Forefathers of Lord Ram) >>>>>>>>> Lord Ram.

Rishi VIsvana is also known as Vivaswat. His wife was sanjana and their son was Manu, also known as Vivaswat Manu. The Manu of this Manvantara (age cycle).

This Rishi Manu , in his earlier Janma (life before rebirth) (in the Manvantara before this one) was the King of Dravida called Satyavrata. Satyavrata was reborn as Vivaswat Manu in this Manvantara.

BTW, the name of the Manu was Shraddhadev. Manu is the "title".
 
.
Rishi VIsvana is also known as Vivaswat. His wife was sanjana and their son was Manu, also known as Vivaswat Manu. The Manu of this Manvantara (age cycle).

This Rishi Manu , in his earlier Janma (life before rebirth) (in the Manvantara before this one) was the King of Dravida called Satyavrata. Satyavrata was reborn as Vivaswat Manu in this Manvantara.

BTW, the name of the Manu was Shraddhadev. Manu is the "title".

He was Son of Visvaan(Son of Rishi Kashyapa + Aditi) that's why he is called Visvat and his mother was Sangya (Daughter of Vishvakarma).

He was King of Dravida it does not make him Dravidian. Same as Ravan is Brahaman not Dravidian.

He is said to be King of Dravida not in previous life but as Seventh Manu(all reference Vishnu Purana).
 
.
He was Son of Visvaan(Son of Rishi Kashyapa + Aditi) that's why he is called Visvat and his mother was Sangya (Daughter of Vishvakarma).

He was King of Dravida it does not make him Dravidian. Same as Ravan is Brahaman not Dravidian.

He is said to be King of Dravida not in previous life but as Seventh Manu(all reference Vishnu Purana).

A king of Dravida is obviously a Dravidian.

Yes, it was not a rebirth in the classical sense. It was a new life as Manu after the deluge that destroyed everything and started this Manvantara.
 
.
A king of Dravida is obviously a Dravidian.

Yes, it was not a rebirth in the classical sense. It was a new life as Manu after the deluge that destroyed everything and started this Manvantara.

He was son of Rishi Visvaan and Grand Son of Rishi Kashyap both are not termed as from South(Dravida) (I hate calling Dravida and Arya in literal sense, as is used in present days), hence Manu cannot be Dravida.

But he was King of Dravida before the Great Flood dont make him Dravidian.

Same is true for Ravan.
 
.
He was son of Rishi Visvaan and Grand Son of Rishi Kashyap both are not termed as from South(Dravida) (I hate calling Dravida and Arya in literal sense, as is used in present days), hence Manu cannot be Dravida.

But he was King of Dravida before the Great Flood dont make him Dravidian.

Same is true for Ravan.

Dravida means land between three oceans. I have no idea why you are linking it to "arya" as if there is some connection between the two.

King Satyavrat was the ruled of Dravida Kingdom. So that makes him Dravidian i.e. from the south. In fact, before the deluge, Iksvaku was the king of the Dravida kingdom too since Satyavrat had handed over the kingdom to his son and had taken sanyas ashram.

Its only after the Deluge, that Satyavrat became Manu and Iksvaku became king of Ayodhya.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom