Ah ferrari io was about to say that as Stealth's own faith is different so he can say and make fun of hindu as well as anyone's gods but with due appology stealth may be for many hindus their gods may be something to make fun of but for us Muslim we do not make fun of our faith as we have strong faith.
I have strong faith but I make fun as well it is all in good humour.. My distant cousin is the 7th descendant of Guru Nanak he also makes fun good humouredly.. there is nothing wrong in that...
its not question of secular or non-secular its the way one takes his/her religion for respect..
respect faith humour are 3 different things.. k??
a hindu community site has send me pics of hinud gods who's dieties after Dosehra are bulldozed on Gunga site and the gods were lying in Garbage and heaps of *****.
they are probably those of Ravana...
it was realy sad even im a Muslim but i could not approve of such an irresponsible behaviour.
Approve of suicide bombings??
but anyway if thats the way their faith is no one has the right to question.
why not?? you have every right...
That is what is my issue with people.. instead of showing you are religious and praying 5 times and fighting on the net etc.. doesnot make you spiritual it makes you a fanatic and an ostensible Muslim..
That is why Quran says only God is the judge as to who is a true Muslim...
I am not a Hindu, Stealth is an atheist yet we both were against crap posted by a certain member on a religion which we don't follow, this is called respect for others beliefs
-------------------------------
The question isn't about strong faith...its about tolerance and having a sense of humour.I don't see how the faith of muslims is under attack if some hindu publishes a picture of muhammed. Is the Hindu supposed to adhere to muslim laws?
Similarly when kids post stuff like Hindus drink cow piss etc..
or that Sikhs can only get married when they have killed Muslims
I've seen several Persian and Arabic paintings of Muhammad. I wonder why no muslims protested then.Its just an excuse to polarize the muslims and win votes to "defend the faith". Faith isn't defended by rioting in the streets, its defended by personally adhering to the rules. Not by forcing everyone around you to follow your rules.
By fighting Muslims are acknowleding their thumbscrew.. and this some miscreants will turn..
..
I think instead of rioting if they have such strong faith then needn't be insecure or counter blasphemy of non-Muslims.. nobody is threatning ur faith or ur life..
There is nothing sad about it. The idols aren't considered sacred after the ritual is over. simple.
Idols are idols.. until they are not installed in teh temple with proper ceremony till then they are not sacred..
Who is questioning their faith?
Did anyone force the muslims to look at the picture of muhammad?
Did anyone ask muslims to read that book?
as Muradk said that many Muslims actually have photos of the prophet..
This is a non-issue.. Muslims should file a PIL.. and if the courts which they most probably will rule in favour of the Muslims then remove the photos.. we don't have to act/nor need to act cocky like the Europeans...
If hindus want to look at photos of muhammed, I don't see why the muslims should have a problem with it as long as they aren't being forced to do the same.
Logic...
many Sindhi and Punjabi Hindus have actually installed idols of Sikh Gurus in their homes which for a Sikh is blasphemous but do we do anything about it?? Nah.. There is no compulsion in religion.. I have such a strong faith in my religion that this does not concern me.. to each his own.. I don't feel a need to preach or to reform... what one does in one's personal life is their business..
but if this used to incite Muslims then it should not be indulged..
If a hindu wants to worship lord Krishna, the other Shiva worshiping hindu has no problems with it. I don't see why Muslims can't adopt this philosophy of "mind your own business".