Muhammad Omar
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2014
- Messages
- 13,558
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
Tribunal: Give Proof of your allegations of Rigging
Imran Khan:
Imran Khan:
Proof of allegations... Answer By KAPTAAN...
- Thread starter Muhammad Omar
- Start date
muslim_pakistani
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2014
- Messages
- 205
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
change the title to "Golden quotations of visionary leader Imran Khan"
When IK nominate a judge for Election commission post that is also in board of Governor in Shaukt Khanm Hospital . It is called merit.
When IK nominate a judge for Election commission post that is also in board of Governor in Shaukt Khanm Hospital . It is called merit.
Muhammad Omar
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2014
- Messages
- 13,558
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
change the title to "Golden quotations of visionary leader Imran Khan"
When IK nominate a judge for Election commission post that is also in board of Governor in Shaukt Khanm Hospital . It is called merit.
Watch this Saboot to bagon(bags) me pare hue hain mere pass ni hain.. mere to sir pe choor lagi thi mujhy kuch yaad ni
Muhammad Omar
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2014
- Messages
- 13,558
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
Shoor is liye machata hai q k Punjab ne ise Vote ni dia or yeh PM ni bna hai... is ne kitni dafa Karachi me dhandli ki baat ki kitni dafa MQM k against bola yeh jb k MQM ki dhandli ki videos tk hain karachi k halkon ki baat Imran khan q ni krta hai? q k Karachi jai bhar me wahan to sirf 7 8 seats hain asal seats to Punjab me hain
Proudpakistaniguy
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2013
- Messages
- 4,890
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Short term memory loss lol
Gajni part 2.
Mr. Taliban khan is loosing his head alot. Mental case want to be our PM.
Muhammad Omar
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2014
- Messages
- 13,558
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
Shoaib Rathore
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2012
- Messages
- 151
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
made my day! surely deserve a noble prize.
Muhammad Omar
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2014
- Messages
- 13,558
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
Green Arrow
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2014
- Messages
- 3,808
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
IK should join the parliament and bring some reforms package rather than going crazy
Muhammad Omar
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2014
- Messages
- 13,558
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
ISLAMABAD: After Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan appeared before the election tribunal in Lahore, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) on Saturday claimed that the vocal PTI chief had failed to present any evidence of rigging and that he was trying to fool the nation without evidence.
According to a statement released by the PML-N, the party claimed that Imran had admitted before the tribunal on Saturday that he was incapacitated and could not recall much of the election, or names of those involved in rigging.
The PML-N statement included excerpts of Saturday’s questioning:
“Imran Khan was asked in tribunal court if he was on bed rest when the elections happened?
He said yes.
He was asked if he witnessed rigging first hand.
He said no.
He was asked who told him about the rigging.
He said a lot of people including polling agents, election agent and voters. He said he couldn’t recall the names of any as he had a severe head injury-concussion. He also said that his affidavit was dictated by Shoaib Siddiqui as he himself could not recall anything.
When asked, he said that he does not remember the oath commissioner who attested his affidavit in Lahore (the oath commissioner is based in Islamabad/Rawalpindi).
On provision of any documentary evidence to him or to any official specific to NA 122, Imran Khan said he had seen documentary evidence from throughout Pakistan but not of NA 122.
The statement further claimed that Saturday’s hearing proved that Imran was not only trying to fool citizens, but was also trying to get last year’s election invalidated through baseless statements.
The party further stated that verdicts cannot and should not be based on hearsay and that the PTI chief should not pressurise judges and courts into deciding a case in his favour.
“Judges and courts are under a moral and ethical obligation to decide based on evidence” the statement concluded.
Meanwhile, PML-N sources have told The Express Tribune that the party, buoyed by Saturday’s tribunal proceedings, has decided to go on the offensive against the PTI chief.
Sources said that party leaders, while making Saturday proceeding’s the bottom line, have devised a strategy to counter PTI and Imran’s claims over electoral rigging.
Earlier on Saturday, Imran had appeared before the election tribunal which is reviewing his request for probing elections in NA-122.
Imran, while urging the tribunal to hold a recount, had said that if the government was convinced about the transparency of the elections, it would not be so hesitant about accountability.
“The evidence is in the ballot bags. Why are they so scared of opening them?”
The PTI chief demanded that the government explain why it was hiding behind the stay orders if it was so sure about the outcome of the elections.
According to a statement released by the PML-N, the party claimed that Imran had admitted before the tribunal on Saturday that he was incapacitated and could not recall much of the election, or names of those involved in rigging.
The PML-N statement included excerpts of Saturday’s questioning:
“Imran Khan was asked in tribunal court if he was on bed rest when the elections happened?
He said yes.
He was asked if he witnessed rigging first hand.
He said no.
He was asked who told him about the rigging.
He said a lot of people including polling agents, election agent and voters. He said he couldn’t recall the names of any as he had a severe head injury-concussion. He also said that his affidavit was dictated by Shoaib Siddiqui as he himself could not recall anything.
When asked, he said that he does not remember the oath commissioner who attested his affidavit in Lahore (the oath commissioner is based in Islamabad/Rawalpindi).
On provision of any documentary evidence to him or to any official specific to NA 122, Imran Khan said he had seen documentary evidence from throughout Pakistan but not of NA 122.
The statement further claimed that Saturday’s hearing proved that Imran was not only trying to fool citizens, but was also trying to get last year’s election invalidated through baseless statements.
The party further stated that verdicts cannot and should not be based on hearsay and that the PTI chief should not pressurise judges and courts into deciding a case in his favour.
“Judges and courts are under a moral and ethical obligation to decide based on evidence” the statement concluded.
Meanwhile, PML-N sources have told The Express Tribune that the party, buoyed by Saturday’s tribunal proceedings, has decided to go on the offensive against the PTI chief.
Sources said that party leaders, while making Saturday proceeding’s the bottom line, have devised a strategy to counter PTI and Imran’s claims over electoral rigging.
Earlier on Saturday, Imran had appeared before the election tribunal which is reviewing his request for probing elections in NA-122.
Imran, while urging the tribunal to hold a recount, had said that if the government was convinced about the transparency of the elections, it would not be so hesitant about accountability.
“The evidence is in the ballot bags. Why are they so scared of opening them?”
The PTI chief demanded that the government explain why it was hiding behind the stay orders if it was so sure about the outcome of the elections.
Similar threads
