Name the wars USA has lost
Vietnam - we lost the battle but won the war. Vietnam is closer to USA than any other foreign power. I will let you figure out that one.
Proliferation of Pakistani N-programme a threat for US
- Thread starter nahtanbob
- Start date
Name the wars USA has lost
Vietnam - we lost the battle but won the war. Vietnam is closer to USA than any other foreign power. I will let you figure out that one.
maximuswarrior
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2016
- Messages
- 13,771
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
LOL BD was always going to become independent. Geographically it wasn’t feasible. How about your buddy India that is still dreaming of reuniting Pakistan by 2025? LOL
You take a lot of pride in Israel occupying and stealing land from weaker neighbors. It is not so difficult to steal from the stone throwing Palestinians.
When Israel faces real adversaries its sophisticated F-16s get shot out of sky like flies. Don’t try to convince us about Israeli invincibility. We know how vulnerable they are.
LOL at Israelis have better relations with KSA. Stop smoking Afghan stuff.
Israel has already declared war on Pakistan covertly. We know that they are aiding India as much as they can. They were always opposed to our nuclear capability and did whatever they could to thwart our weapons.
It is better for Israel to hope that Pakistan doesn’t become active in their backyard because we will mean business. Ask the Americans who tried to forment terror in Pakistan through the Afghan border, but ended up begging for Afghan talks after 18 years.
Last edited:
Enigma SIG
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 8,593
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Oh you could start in India; as livestock is increasingly suspect of causing climate change .
or "America First"; whichever way you want to have it.
metalfalcon
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2008
- Messages
- 2,247
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA you won every battle in Vietnam but lost the war and the Vietnam war was lost in the streets of Washington not in the jungles of Vietnam. How come you can say you guys won in Vietnam when you retreated your enemies took hold of the whole country and you call this a VICTORY keep enjoying your fantasies with a joint of pure Afghani opium express. You lost in Vietnam and its a fact and even american historians have written about it.
Vietnam is a closer ally of USA just as Japan is just as UK just as GERMANY is it doesn't mean that USA didn't had bad terms with them in the past.
Most Americans rightly believe that the U.S. military is the best and most formidable in the world. If that is correct, why, since the end of World War II, has the United States lost every war it started and failed every time it used force without just cause? Indeed, if the U.S. military was a sports team, it would land in the bottom divisions.
here are some links to refresh your comprehension of American VICTORIES
https://observer.com/2017/11/why-america-loses-every-war-it-starts/
https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2017/11/why-america-loses-every-war-it-starts/142646/
Enigma SIG
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 8,593
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
USA never fought an enemy on par with its military/economy.
War have political objectives. vietnam war was to prevent communism. communism is dead. in 1975 it looks like America lost. But in 2019 America won in Vietnam.
WW2 Germany & Japan
Soviet Union
Enigma SIG
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 8,593
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
Allies did your work. You just came in a snatched their glory.
Hollywood's attempts at rewriting history don't change the facts on the ground.
metalfalcon
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2008
- Messages
- 2,247
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
We saved your A** in Somalia (Remember Black Hawk Down) we saved your A** against the Communist Red Bear of Soviet Union, We were the ones who brought the Russians down (of course with your money and your F-16 and stingers in particular + Saudi aid) so you were loosing till the 80s and then we helped you bring the Berlin wall down
What allies ?? Soviets for sure. USA kept Britain alive. Even USSR got huge amounts of military material under land lease program.
to say communism ended because of Afghanistan is a fantasy, it hurt the USSR.
On Somalia I wish you hadn't saved the Rangers. It is time Washington stopped poking into internal affairs of every country.
Orca
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2016
- Messages
- 661
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
metalfalcon
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2008
- Messages
- 2,247
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I am sorry Mann you must be living in some other Dimension because in the real world in which i am living in all of these facts are well documented even in American archives.
Enigma SIG
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 8,593
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
I'm not interested in the wars the US perpetrated based on outright lies. Can't put my finger on what the intent was: genocide, nationalism, restriction on freedom of movement, economic stragulation. Could be all of them. The US is a known perpetrator of crimes against humanity. The other powers played along because well; they made money out of it too.
Deception on Capitol Hill
Super Falcon
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2008
- Messages
- 15,816
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Does hindu nukes are not security concern for US
The Accountant
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
- Messages
- 8,504
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
Who told you this, keep dreaming ?
JF-17ThunderBlock3
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
- Messages
- 314
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/445831-pak-n-programme-proliferation-threat-to-us-pompeo
WASHINGTON: The US Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, has said that there are five big issues that threaten the American security and one of them is proliferation of Pakistan’s nuclear programme.
Counting the five threats the US is facing, while giving an interview to an American radio broadcaster, the US secretary of state said: ““It's the threat that we've talked about today from China, the nuclear proliferation risk that extends from Pakistan, through all those folks who have these weapon systems places like North Korea where they can sell these weapons. I think I'm at five already but I could give you a whole list of threats that I think we can effect change on in a way that will really make a difference for the security of the American people.”
He blamed Pakistan for providing safe havens to terrorists, adding that no other administration but the current administration had taken some action against Pakistan on the issue. He said he personally took terrorism very seriously because he had lost a lot of friends in the war against terror.
“Well we've taken actions … against Pakistan that no other administration has taken. ... We need Pakistan to do more. They have to stop harboring this terror. We saw what happened with India. The conflict that rose there as a result of terrorist that departed from Pakistan. ... They need to stop harboring terrorists.”
Pompeo said the US Administration has learnt a lot from the 9/11 terror attack and put pressure on the Pakistan government to do more.
Commenting on the recent conflict between Pakistan and India, the secretary said it was initiated because of the cross-border terrorism. He emphasised on Pakistan to take further action against such terrorists and stop providing alleged safe havens to them.
Replying to a question regarding the Taliban’s relationship with al-Qaeda and the recent talks with the Taliban leadership in Afghanistan, Pompeo said he cannot say anything definite about the issue. He said the US is working for final resolution of the issue in Afghanistan and trying to take steps for political reconciliation.
Pompeo said that Zalmay Khalilzad went to Doha for talks and returned yesterday, adding that there were some advancement in talks on the issue of Taliban and the Afghan government. He said the US wanted both should talk to each other to resolve the issue.
“There's no deal at thispoint. We don't have final resolution there but we are working towards a political reconciliation. We've been hard at it Ambassador Khalilzad has been on the ground in Doha for six or eight days back I think yesterday. We've made some progress both with the Afghan government and with the Taliban. We now need them to talk to each other. President's made clear his objective here he wants to end this endless war. But he wants to do it in a way that we don't increase risk to the United States from terror acts coming from Afghanistan. I believe we can achieve both of those groups,” Pompeo said.
Talking about US President, Pompeo said Trump wanted to end the war but he also wanted to ensure no terror attack should ever take place in future on America.
Talking about the recent attacks of the Taliban on Afghan forces, in which 50 Afghan personnel were abducted and one week before that at least 70 were killed, the secretary of state said that such attacks did not weaken the position of the coalition and Afghan forces. He said he knew who are sitting in front of the table for peace talks, saying but they want America to be safe.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the United States and North Korea are trying to get the "sequencing" right in talks to end the regime's nuclear weapons program and open a brighter future for the country.
"I can't say much about the details of the negotiation as those are important private conversations," the top US diplomat said, when asked about the failure to produce an agreement at last month's summit between President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. "But it's clearly a range of issues around timing and sequencing and how it is we achieve this." He said Trump's commitment to a brighter future for the North Korean people is "very, very real."
"But it must follow -- it has to follow the verified denuclearisation of North Korea," he said. "And getting that sequencing right and getting it laid out in a way that each of the parties can agree to and take down the tension level along the North and South Korean border, it matters to the people of Japan and South Korea, our important partners, and it matters to the whole world."
Trump and Kim met in Hanoi, Vietnam, Feb. 27 and 28 to flesh out an agreement they reached at their first summit in Singapore in June. The agreement committed the North to work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in exchange for security guarantees from the US. The second summit ended with no deal due to disagreements over the extent of North Korea's denuclearization and US sanctions relief.
"We believe we're still moving forward. It's certainly difficult -- we knew it would be," Pompeo. "We made a little bit more progress in Hanoi, now three weeks back, when President Trump traveled there to meet with Chairman Kim. We'll re-engage with him," he said.
"We still haven't made the progress we need to make on denuclearisation. The conversations certainly continue. I hope we can achieve that," he added, noting that was Kim's "promise" to the world at his summit with Trump in Singapore
This Guy is irrelevant, We have seen much more better than this in the history.
From Jimmy Carter->R.Reagan-> Bushes
Let him be news chimes for a while
Similar threads
