Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you're saying that Japanese people visiting Yasukuni is equivalent to us spitting in your face, right?
Let me infer a rhetorical question, do you think some people are insulted when some Chinese leaders visit the graves of Mao? Or what about the monument to the 1979 Sino Vietnam War, or what about the monument to the 1962 Sino Indian War?
I don't think Germans get angry when Russians visit their war commemorations , nor do we Japanese care when the Americans celebrate anniversary events in Iwo Jima, Okinawa, Rabaul, Pearl Harbor or the like. We commemorate with each other, actually.
It's disturbing to read your post. And as what @LeveragedBuyout pointed out, over the 30 some years Japan played a role in helping China industrialize, the hundreds of billions of dollars worth in investments, the political collaborations, the agreements of good faith such as the moratoriums, the fishing agreements et al. But your post illustrates that there still is a fomenting of hatred for Japan and for us Japanese.
You incessantly refer to our honoring of our soldiers' souls as "spitting in your face". You should read more into Japanese concept of honor and respecting the dead. After all you are dealing with us Japanese. Perhaps there is a dichotomy between us and you Chinese in regards to that filial duty.
I fear that even after these 14 individuals are removed, some Chinese will protest and future politicians will milk the history for political clout. In that regards, what's the point at all?
After all, Japan, in my opinion , has done already so much for China.
Then to hear such discouraging points of view such as those that you showed. I can't help but feel a disgusting taste in my mouth after reading such words.
There is no hatred for you, why can't you understand it, nobody in China gives a damn what you do or why you do it, the only thing we care about is you are standing in the way of our prize fight, and that's not cool dude.
what bush, I clearly stated what I wanted to say right below that paragraph. What's not to understand, which part of Japan won't be a super power and thus cannot be in the ring didn't you understand.There you again with your vague and indirectness. Say what you really want to say, dude. You keep on referring to this 'prize fight' Just be direct with me, Genesis. No need to beat around the bush. lol
You think China's final goal is to defeat you? It's not, and it has happened, we moved on, as it happens Japan is caught in the middle of China and US, if you don't believe me, why are we doing what we are doing to Philippines then, they didn't partake in the Japanese invasion.
Source: Progressive development in Yasukuni | Page 2
what bush, I clearly stated what I wanted to say right below that paragraph. What's not to understand, which part of Japan won't be a super power and thus cannot be in the ring didn't you understand.
Heavy weights can't fight middle weights, it's mean, now Japan like Roy Jones can win a belt when the competition is nothing, but against the Kilitchkos he's going to get killed. Same deal here, you may defeat us that one time when we were at our weakest, but today, not going to happen.
This is actually from my post, how is this unclear.
I don't want to deviate this thread to talks about war or future wars , as I don't think that is conducive to any proper intellectual debate. The only reason why I addressed you is because , from my personal observation, I had thought / perceived your reference to a fight -- referring that you want China to war with Japan. Perhaps I was wrong, I'd be happy to read your clarification.
Clarify with me about this "prized fight" that you've mentioned in your previous post.