That is from 2013.
I am referring to the report from 2016, which I am sure You heard about, but choose to ignore.
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=54795#.WOn3MpFeChA
30 August 2016 –
The Syrian Airforce and ISIL used toxic chemicals as weapons, according to a new report issued on Tuesday by Organisation for Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and United Nations Joint Investigative Mechanism (JIM), and mandated by the UN Security Council.
The Mechanism, led by a three-person Leadership Panel (Virginia Gamba, Adrian Neritani, Eberhard Schanze), examined nine cases of previously-documented chemical weapons use to establish who was responsible for using them.
The Panel found what it described as “sufficient evidence” of three cases of chemical weapons use –
two chlorine gas attacks on civilians by the Syrian air force, and another use of “sulphur-mustard” gas by the terrorist group ISIL, or Daesh – in Syria between 2014 and 2015.
...
Russia, aware that NATO has full radar coverage over the area, and therefore was likely
to be able to produce credible data over who attacked Idlib, quickly declared that the attack was made by the Syrian Air Force.
Yet, without any investigation, they declared that it must have hit a weapons cache of chemical weapons.
If they have full control over Syrian Air Force operations, does that not mean
that they are responsible for the subsuquent bombing of the hospital
with the victims of the attack?
If they do not have full control, how come they know what ordonnance was released by the Syrian Air Force?