President Donald Trump's executive immigration order

[bdslph]

what trump did no countries should do this

 

[Manidabest]

You see, the problem is not security, but trump use that instead of using "the real" word of it, trump do not want muslim, since he's accepting only "christian" refugees... . The thing used for hajj was to give you the absurdityof his statement. And then those asking why not all muslim countries then, if he doens't want muslims... well it's simple, one part of the muslims have power the other not... . This has nothing to do with security, it's just hate and politics. if he want to protect his country then he should start banning afghanistans , pakistans, few in the golf, yemen and even north africa...

well u r 100% true that he hates muslims and some muslim countries r strong etc but the question i always ask my fellow muslims do we muslims treat ethnic minorities nicely??? ask those minorities who r living in muslim majority countries. we muslims dont treat fellow muslims of other ethnicity nicely. what trump did was seen right by his people and he got the votes for that and he got majority votes so we should get over it ...

 

[my2cents]

Those seven countries should ban the US citizens.

''Tit for Tat'' but what is about these countries that US is afraid off. It is the potential terrorist sneaking in to destroy America.

 

[Zibago]

https://twitter.com/x/status/825471655216549892

Remember, there are plenty of people who accept immigrants, migrants and refugees from all nations too. It's not just those who want to turn them away.

...

I also changed the title of this thread, merged several others and going forwards we'll be using one dedicated thread for all news regarding the "Executive Order - Protecting the Nation from Terrorist Attacks by Foreign Nationals" - or in plain text, Trump's order barring the movements of persons from 7 nations.

This thread will be "stickied" until deemed no longer necessary.

The troubling part started when he even included greecard holders in the ban this is beginning of something big maybe he will start a registry of people from Muslim majority countries
I think its better maybe in future no stupid Muslim will ever get America involved in their national issues

 

[untitled]

So you will discriminate against your own people now hmm

Green card holders are not US citizens technically. They are just non citizens with the least restrictions on them as compared to other visa holding visitors.

Having said that grouping them with refugees and other aliens is plain wrong.

 

[ahojunk]

WORLD NEWS | Sat Jan 28, 2017 | 10:33pm EST | Reuters
Green card holders will need additional screening: White House


U.S. green card holders will require additional screening before they can return to the United States, the White House said on Saturday.

Earlier, a Department of Homeland Security official said people holding green cards, making them legal permanent U.S. residents, were included in President Donald Trump's executive action temporarily barring people from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States.

"It will bar green card holders," Gillian Christensen, acting Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman, said in an email.

A senior White House official later sought to clarify the situation, saying green card holders who had left the United States and wanted to return would have to visit a U.S. embassy or consulate to undergo additional screening.

"You will be allowed to re-enter the United States pending a routine rescreening," the official said.


(Reporting by Doina Chiacu; Editing by Alan Crosby and Paul Tait)


********

This "extreme vetting" is crazy. It should not be applied to Green card holders.
.

 

[Mugwop]

A US judge has issued a temporary halt to the deportation of visa holders or refugees stranded at airports following President Trump's executive order.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a case in response to the order issued on Friday.

The ACLU estimates that between 100 and 200 people are being detained at airports or in transit.

Thousands of people have been protesting at US airports over Mr Trump's clampdown on immigration.

His executive order halted the entire US refugee programme and also instituted a 90-day travel ban for nationals from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

Those who were already mid-flight were detained on arrival - even if they held valid US visas or other immigration permits.

On Saturday, Mr Trump told reporters: "It's working out very nicely. You see it at the airports, you see it all over."

Other executive orders issued by Mr Trump on Saturday were:

• A ban on administration officials ever lobbying on behalf of a foreign government
• An order to Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to come up with a plan within 30 days to defeat so-called Islamic State
• Restructuring the National Security Council with a key role for senior strategist Steve Bannon

Irreparable injury'
The ruling, from federal Judge Ann Donnelly, in New York, prevented the removal from the US of people with approved refugee applications, valid visas, and "other individuals... legally authorised to enter the United States".

The emergency ruling also said there was a risk of "substantial and irreparable injury" to those affected.

Her ruling is not on the constitutionality of Mr Trump's executive order. What will happen to those still held at airports remains unclear.
The feeling of injustice is so big, and this ban is so demeaning! Shame!" - Syrian scientist working on skin cancer research and living in Germany who now finds she cannot travel to Philadelphia in February to visit colleagues.

"Dreams shattered" - cardiology fellow from Jordan whose Syrian wife's family cannot come to visit in the US.

"We may try our chances with other countries" - Iranian professional in Washington DC, whose wife is now stuck in Iran.

US entry ban victims vent fury

Early on Sunday, the Department of Homeland Security said it would comply with judicial rulings but would continue to enforce Mr Trump's order.

The case was brought early on Saturday on behalf of two Iraqi men detained at JFK Airport in New York.

One worked for the US military in Iraq. The other is married to a former US military contract employee.

Both have now been released. Another court hearing is set for February.

Lee Gelernt, deputy legal director of the Immigrants Rights Project, who argued the case in court said that some people had been threatened with being "put back on a plane" later on Saturday.

Mr Gelernt also said the judge had ordered the government to provide a list of names of those detained under the order.

Judges elsewhere in the US have also ruled on the issue:

• In Boston, a judge decided two Iranian nationals, professors at the University of Massachusetts, should be released from detention at Logan International Airport

• An order issued in Virginia banned, for seven days, the deportation of green card holders held at Dulles Airport and ordered the authorities to allow access to lawyers

• A Seattle judge issued an emergency stay of removal from the US for two people

Criticism of Mr Trump's decision has been growing louder outside the US.

Iran is threatening a reciprocal ban on US citizens entering the country.

Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany issued a statement saying "even the necessary, determined fight against terrorism does not justify placing people of a certain origin or belief under general suspicion".

A spokesperson for UK PM Theresa May said she "did not agree" with the restrictions, and French independent presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron tweeted: "I stand with the people fleeing war and persecution".

Protesters shouted "let them in" at demonstrations at New York's JFK Airport

 

[Mugwop]

@ sadists on this forum who used to cheer for trump

 

[rocketfish]

good to hear

 

[Hyde]

https://twitter.com/x/status/825580660337283073

 

[cocomo]

@ sadists on this forum who used to cheer for trump

Can trump challenge this ruling legally like in supreme court or somewhere?

 

[Peaceful Civilian]

@ sadists on this forum who used to cheer for trump

But same people from these banned countries will involve in negative activities there and They will abuse their culture and vulgarity, and more attacks to come in night clubs and attacks on other organizers for controversial events .
I think Supreme Court should not interfere on government decision. All institutions should work independently and should not interfere in each other matter.

 

[nightingale]

Trump is just trying to make his supporters happy . I wonder if he really cares about deportations .
Anyways Canada welcomes you all immigrants

 

[Mugwop]

But same people from these banned countries will involve in negative activities there and They will abuse their culture and vulgarity, and more attacks to come in night clubs and attacks on other organizers for controversial events .
I think Supreme Court should not interfere on government decision. All institutions should work independently and should not interfere in each other matter.

Kudos to supreme court no one wants Dictatorship

Can trump challenge this ruling legally like in supreme court or somewhere?

He can try

 

[ashok321]

https://twitter.com/x/status/825736193627168768