The fiasco over the past few weeks has made one thing really evident, our constitution has a million loopholes and definitely needs to be revampled wholesale.
Or perhaps the articles are deliberately left vague so that anyone can use them as they please?
In this specific case, the President is bound by the advice of the PM when appointing a 'new' governor, but the existing governor works at the pleasure of the President.
This, on face value, means that the President can only remove the governor.
I am not a lawyer though, and would be interesting to get an unbiased legal opinion here.