Pregnant Lioness Refuses To Eat Chicken Served After UP Slaughterhouse Crackdown

[adil_minhas]

This is not about Hindu and Muslim. This is more about 'Indian'. If constitution says that all Indians are to be treated equally, then you cannot have permission to Muslim men having 4 wives legally without allowing anyone to have have four spouses, legally. I doubt you will tolerate Muslim women having legal permission to marry 4 husbands at a time. This is why I think one husband one wife compromise will be best for all Indians -- including Hindu and Muslim.

Further, even if it comes down to Muslims, on the matters like Talaq, I doubt most of Muslim women will be on same page as Muslim men and there are about 80-100 million of Muslim women. There are already demands from Muslim women to ban triple Talaq as a legally valid divorce. You will agree that law making in India cannot be left alone on Muslim men. In these matters, it muslim women are also a party to it and you cannot have a country which treats all citizens equally but defers to Muslim men on few key matters. If Muslim women in general want to end a practice that affects them, I guess we cannot brush that away because a religious scripture says otherwise.

Finally, I will like to clarify, my posts are nothing personal about you in particular but a general idea.

1) We do not trust Hindus. We see Indian polity and law makers as prima Hindu. We are on board following laws common for all citizens. But marrying among ourselves, divorcing, bequeathing wealth and property. What business does the state or any Indian have with that? Lay off. Our personal business.

2) If our women have problems, we solve it among ourselves. You or the state has no locus standi in.our personal laws.

The you in my post does not refer to you personally either and is generic in nature directed at any well meaning (or otherwise) Indian non Muslim.

Cheers.

This is just absolute horse shyte.

Yup. Jhatka does taste (and smell) remarkably like horse shyte.

Politely not eaten the mutton at a Maratha friend's mutton Akhad party. Even from afar the smell is strong.

 

[Roybot]

Yup. Jhatka does taste (and smell) remarkably like horse shyte.

Politely not eaten the mutton at a Maratha friend's mutton Akhad party. Even from afar the smell is strong.

That's just your inherent hatred for others and the brain washing talking. Am sure you didn't eat halal steaks when you visited Australia, and you d be lying if you say that they weren't the best steaks you have ever had.

 

[DineshS]

Yup. Jhatka does taste (and smell) remarkably like horse shyte.

I don't eat Halal, Honestly, Halal meat smells like something that crawled of an open sewer.

On top of the smell, the inhumane way of killing those animals along with the visuals of terrorirts doing halal of humans is too much for me.

I don't go to hotels that serve halal meat either.

 

[adil_minhas]

That's just your inherent hatred for others and the brain washing talking. Am sure you didn't eat halal steaks when you visited Australia, and you d be lying if you say that they weren't the best steaks you have ever had.

When it comes to meat I'd take the taste buds and nose of a Muslim anyday over a bhaji muncher.

Kudos.

So we (Hindus and Muslims) can't even agree on how to slaughter livestock. Or how the meat smells and tastes.

And you want 200 million Indian Muslims to allow Hindus into their personal lives?

Cheers.

 

[MULUBJA]

First of all Illegal slaughter houses are closed and not all. SO title is misleading.

 

[Proudpakistaniguy]

If Cow is just and animal for you, then Prophet is just a human for non Muslims/ Quran is just another book for Non Muslims. Then why having Blasphemy laws for some one who has drawn a cartoon which is just a human or mis-handled just a book.

Cow cannot be equated to Pork, because is pork is prohibited not holy (like Quran and Prophet)

You have no issues when other eat pork, Similarly Hindus have no issues when others eat chicken / goat (because it is prohibited but not holy)

Very stupid analogy. Everyone should be free to have their own personal beliefs and should be free to live/eat according to them but this does not give anyone a right to impose these beliefs on others. If you can ban Indian Muslims to eat beef based on your Hindu scripture then Indian Muslims should be able to ban Hindus to not drink wine based on their scriptures as wine is haram for them.

You should get in your thick head that Non Hindus dont eat beef with intention of hurting your religious sentiments. Its simply food for them. similarly i would not say non Muslims drink wine because they want to Insult Islam..drawing cartoon of any prophet or scripture serve no purpose but just to insult that religion

 

[DineshS]

Very stupid analogy. Everyone should be free to have their own personal beliefs and should be free to live/eat according to them but this does not give anyone a right to impose these beliefs on others. If you can ban Indian Muslims to eat beef based on your Hindu scripture then Indian Muslims should be able to ban Hindus to not drink wine based on their scriptures as wine is haram for them.

Is Wine sacred to you?
Compare sacred to sacred and haram to haram...

Don't get them jumbled up...

 

[Proudpakistaniguy]

Is Wine sacred to you?
Compare sacred to sacred and haram to haram...

Don't get them jumbled up...

My scripture is sacred to me and my scripture say that wine is haram
Your scripture is sacred to you an dit say cow is sacred/holly animal

now we boht are free to live as per our scriptures but why we should impose it on those who dont believe in our scripture ?

 

[DineshS]

My scripture is sacred to me and my scripture say that wine is haram
Your scripture is sacred to you an dit say cow is sacred/holly animal

now we boht are free to live as per our scriptures but why we should impose it on those who dont believe in our scripture ?

Dude...You don't insult or cut sacred things.

No one cares for insulting haram of other religions..

Please get bearing on logic.

 

[adil_minhas]

My scripture is sacred to me and my scripture say that wine is haram
Your scripture is sacred to you an dit say cow is sacred/holly animal

now we boht are free to live as per our scriptures but why we should impose it on those who dont believe in our scripture ?

Answer from Hindutva lobby: Because we are in power and we currently can.

Let's not beat around the philosophical bush.

They are getting their jollies sticking it to the Muslim every way they can.

 

[Soumitra]

A take on the Yogi Govt based on the poem Krishna Ki Chetavani by Ramdhari Singh Dinkar

http://kavitakosh.org/kk/कृष्ण_की_चेतावनी_/_रामधारी_सिंह_"दिनकर"

 

[Roybot]

When it comes to meat I'd take the taste buds and nose of a Muslim anyday over a bhaji muncher.

Kudos. p

Do Muslims have special olfactory receptor cells or something? Wasn't aware that Muslims have evolved into a different species now!

So we (Hindus and Muslims) can't even agree on how to slaughter livestock. Or how the meat smells and tastes.

And you want 200 million Indian Muslims to allow Hindus into their personal lives?

Cheers.

Why do we have to agree on the method of slaughter, its your religious practice, not ours! If halal really was the best possible way to slaughter an animal, and halal meat really tasted and "Smelt" the best (no scientific proof), the whole world would have moved on to halal method. I mean don't do Bismillah and just follow the Islamic way of animal slaughter, and technically it should taste and smell just as good as the Halal meat right? Or is the reciting of Kalma a necessary ingredient to get this sanctimonious taste and smell from the meat?

See the difference between you and me, a Muslim and a Hindu, is that I didn't go around saying illogical stuff like oh halal meat tastes and smells rank compared to non halal meat, nor did I try to preach you that jhatka meat is the better meat, based on my special olfactory powers, as if am some sniffer dog. To me, or to any other objective person, who doesn't have a religious chip on his shoulder, both halal and non halal meat tastes and smells the same.

You continue to do what your 1400 year old book tells you to do, and I ll do what I think is logical, to each his own. No one has issue with Buffalo meat, as long as its coming from a licensed slaughter house. Follow the law of the land, as simple as that. Till then you enjoy your bhajis, and stop pretending that Muslims in India eat and drink red meat 3 times a day, everyday.

 

[DineshS]

Eating beef feeds a person. Beef is also cheaper than other meat, it helps feed people who cannot afford other meat.

Making cartoon of Mohammed does not have any other purpose but to amuse cartoonist / their 'audience' by insulting something held sacred by Muslim.

No one cares if you eat beef, we only care about Cow.

I can give 1000 reasons regarding artistic freedom being as important as food for human well being but then, I doubt sane logic would cut it at this point.

 

[t_for_talli]

Prophet Muhammed may be normal to you, same as the Quran but he is the messenger of God to us and the Quran the word of God

Insulting him or attacking our book is going out the way to do so

Right similarly Cow is holy, people worship cow.

You feel offended when a non Muslim insult Prophet/ Quran. The same way other feel offended when beef is consumed

 

[DineshS]

These people have gone bonkers ever since Yogi is made CM.

West Bengal is next. Imagine if Modi makes Praveen Togadia as Bengal CM, the Vidhwa Wilap will never end