Possible Saudi strikes on Iraqi militias

[Numerous]

ahahh what a great thing...

house of saud the citadel of islam.. who told you that? sheikh shaitan?

He doesn't mean the house of saud bro. He means the two holy cities. Whilst I am no fan of the house of saud, I do believe it is vital to help them against Iran. Having those wicked ayotollahs ruling over the two holy cities would be a sad thing due to all the evil they bring to Muslim countries.

 

[Aramagedon]

He doesn't mean the house of saud bro. He means the two holy cities. Whilst I am no fan of the house of saud, I do believe it is vital to help them against Iran. Having those wicked ayotollahs ruling over the two holy cities would be a sad thing due to all the evil they bring to Muslim countries.

Just a reminder.

9/11 attack in new york (saudi bin Laden) and Mecca crane collapse happened at the same day (9/11) and even the same time. (2 PM GMT)

And 90% of early Islamic heritage in Mecca and Medina have been Bulldozered by saudi clan.

http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/saudi_destruction_of_muslim_historical_sites1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_of_early_Islamic_heritage_sites_in_Saudi_Arabia

 

[Numerous]

Just a reminder.

9/11 attack in new york (Saudi bin Laden) and Mecca crane collapse happened at the same day (9/11) and the same time. (2 PM GMT)

View attachment 581032

And 90% of early Islamic heritage in Mecca and Medina have been Bulldozered by saudi clan.

http://theamericanmuslim.org/tam.php/features/articles/saudi_destruction_of_muslim_historical_sites1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_of_early_Islamic_heritage_sites_in_Saudi_Arabia

The first thing is literally conspiracy theorist rubbish.

What do you people like you care about saudis bulldoze. Your people hate the sahaba, you erect shrines to the person who killed Umar (ra), you'd do far worse if you controlled the holy cities. Your people have no care for the lives and honour of Muslims, what care would you have for stone buildings connected to people who you hate.

 

[Aramagedon]

The first thing is literally conspiracy theorist rubbish.

What do you people like you care about saudis bulldoze. Your people hate the sahaba, you erect shrines to the person who killed Umar (ra), you'd do far worse if you controlled the holy cities. Your people have no care for the lives and honour of Muslims, what care would you have for stone buildings connected to people who you hate.

Iranians spread Islam in Turkic states and areas like Tajikistan, Afghanistan & Pakistan and now you as a nutjob salafi want to teach us Islam!

You’re nothing but a scum!

Meanwhile I criticized guilty saudi regime I didn’t attack Shia or Sunni like you crazy!

 

[Numerous]

Iranians spread Islam in Turkic states and areas like Tajikistan, Afghanistan & Pakistan and now you as a nutjob salafi want to teach us Islam!

You’re nothing but a scum!

Who said I was talking about Iranians? When I say "your people" I mean the ayotollahs and their followers.

Plenty of good ethnic persian Muslims out there e.g. daniel haqitatjoi.

Not a salafi. Come up with something new because calling someone a salafi for not liking your specific group is getting old.

 

[Aramagedon]

Who said I was talking about Iranians? When I say "your people" I mean the ayotollahs and their followers.

Plenty of good ethnic persian Muslims out there e.g. daniel haqitatjoi.

Not a salafi. Come up with something new because calling someone a salafi for not liking your specific group is getting old.

Piss off.

 

[Numerous]

Piss off.

Don't quote me if you don't like what I'm going to say.

Ayotollah khamenei and co are special to you. Not to me. Heck you guys aren't even special to many Iranians seeing as they protest against you all the time. Come to the west and you will find that many Iranians here will attack you with all kinds of awful language. Will you call them salafi too?

 

[Hack-Hook]

Saudi Arabia was cheering ISIS? They joined the coalition against ISIS.



I don't know, do you?



Iraq will have relations either way with Iran as they are neighbors. But, you realize if Iraqi's are sick of both Iran and Gulf Arabs there are many other countries they can choose from. If I was Iraqi I would want both sides to leave me out of their tug of war. And look to develop relations with other nations. I would just focus on development and economy. I can't see how getting involved in Saudi-Iranian feud is gonna help.

let just say majority of Iraqi people died since USA attack was not by direct USA fire ,it was the result of operation of groups you categorized as small minorities

 

[Timur]

we should remind us and the arabs who speak well about sauds .. yes if they all speak well about the sauds than they should shut their filthy mouthes and also speak well in the public about Trump the one who will bring peace with al saud to the world! if they now come and say I disagree.. shut your mouth you talk bullshit defending saud whenever they can but when it comes to this issue now its different! different poo in different colors may it be green, black, brown or yellowbrown alike or hard or more fluid it still is poo..

so let him who follows my next link and his minions protect mecca yes a good idea...! we dont need such ppl to protect mecca we have allah the almighty.. and he is sufficient for us! just see the government imam of mecca what he has to say..

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mecca-imam-slammed-claiming-trump-steering-world-peace

He doesn't mean the house of saud bro. He means the two holy cities. Whilst I am no fan of the house of saud, I do believe it is vital to help them against Iran. Having those wicked ayotollahs ruling over the two holy cities would be a sad thing due to all the evil they bring to Muslim countries.

oh he does not support house of saud yes..? and how he does! he speaks as saudi land as a whole! he could have easily spoke/write that we clearly would understand its about the two cities but than its rubbish and idiotic claims.. where is any intention of the iranians to attack the two holy cities? who do we see in suicide attacks on mosques? iranians?`

you guys are blind supports of al al saud! I also say and I firmly belive it, that there would be huge amount of ppl supporting al saud if they would attack us (turkey).. I have no doubts about it, including many guys joining them.. we clearly see it


that would be indeed not good

also I say in history muslims fought for land each other.. sauds did the same against the ruling khalifa.. so if that is legimative than its also ok to fight against non khalifa

 

[Numerous]

oh he does not support house of saud yes..? and how he does! he speaks as saudi land as a whole! he could have easily spoke/write that we clearly would understand its about the two cities but than its rubbish and idiotic claims.. where is any intention of the iranians to attack the two holy cities? who do we see in suicide attacks on mosques? iranians?`

you guys are blind supports of al al saud! I also say and I firmly belive it, that there would be huge amount of ppl supporting al saud if they would attack us (turkey).. I have no doubts about it, including many guys joining them.. we clearly see it


that would be indeed not good

also I say in history muslims fought for land each other.. sauds did the same against the ruling khalifa.. so if that is legimative than its also ok to fight against non khalifa

It's more that if the saudis are defeated then the route to the holy cities is open to Iran. I do not think Iran will openly attack the cities with e.g. air strikes or missles, that would instantly ruin their PR. But it's more what happens when they actually gain control.We have seen how they treat others who are not from their group when they gain power. Muslims die, our women are raped, our children are killed, they abuse figures who we hold dear and Islam is silenced & their jewish origin religion is promoted. We've seen what their militias do in Iraq and Syria, it would be no different in Arabia.

I am not interested in a turkish-arab squabble and I support neither in that kind of war. Turks have good characteristics and so do arabs, I find it frustrating they are divided like this. I would not support a saudi attack on Turkey. Pakistanis are generally a very turk friendly people anyway, most would not support it.

Once these ayotollahs are done with arabs, they will come for me and you too.

 

[Timur]

It's more that if the saudis are defeated then the route to the holy cities is open to Iran. I do not think Iran will openly attack the cities with e.g. air strikes or missles, that would instantly ruin their PR. But it's more what happens when they actually gain control.We have seen how they treat others who are not from their group when they gain power. Muslims die, our women are raped, our children are killed, they abuse figures äwho we hold dear and Islam is silenced & their jewish origin religion is promoted. We've seen what their militias do in Iraq and Syria, it would be no different in Arabia.

I am not interested in a turkish-arab squabble and I support neither in that kind of war. Turks have good characteristics and so do arabs, I find it frustrating they are divided like this. I would not support a saudi attack on Turkey. Pakistanis are generally a very turk friendly people anyway, most would not support it.

Once these ayotollahs are done with arabs, they will come for me and you too.

t's more that if the saudis are defeated then the route to the holy cities is open to Iran

and this hypertheoratical future is like to happen if the good sauds are defeated? its like saying if metoriods suddenly hit major cities of saudi arabia destroying 80% of the population and 95% of their military iranians will run and get all the land there.. do you think a military like saudi arabia and than UAE, Kuwait, parts of Iraq Oman, Bahrain and than Egypt will sit there and watch? do you think Israel would sit there and watch? do you think USA would just watch? what glibberish are you talking?!

Muslims die

they die in syria, they die in myanmar, they die in kashmir and they die in east turkestan except the first no one cares and I ranked them up in popularity..

muslims also died after al saud took control of the lands.. and they die today because they say we should have peace with this and that country.. just because of innocent good words!

Once these ayotollahs are done with arabs, they will come for me and you too.

again idiotic hyperifthancouldbesoandso thing.. you mean after their nation is in ruins (bombed by sauds and arabs and israel and US) they will come descreased war thorn to us and attack us? send 5 of them we take them all down..

most would not support it

thats just pretty talk.. they will find a way, its about comfort and money that ppl begin to side with special groubs providing them with what they want...

and you compleatly ignored the Trump Sudais part thank you for enlighning us!

 

[Numerous]

and this hypertheoratical future is like to happen if the good sauds are defeated? its like saying if metoriods suddenly hit major cities of saudi arabia destroying 80% of the population and 95% of their military iranians will run and get all the land there.. do you think a military like saudi arabia and than UAE, Kuwait, parts of Iraq Oman, Bahrain and than Egypt will sit there and watch? do you think Israel would sit there and watch? do you think USA would just watch? what glibberish are you talking?!



they die in syria, they die in myanmar, they die in kashmir and they die in east turkestan except the first no one cares and I ranked them up in popularity..

muslims also died after al saud took control of the lands.. and they die today because they say we should have peace with this and that country.. just because of innocent good words!




again idiotic hyperifthancouldbesoandso thing.. you mean after their nation is in ruins (bombed by sauds and arabs and israel and US) they will come descreased war thorn to us and attack us? send 5 of them we take them all down..



thats just pretty talk.. they will find a way, its about comfort and money that ppl begin to side with special groubs providing them with what they want...

and you compleatly ignored the Trump Sudais part thank you for enlighning us!

I don't think this conversation is getting anywhere. Best to just leave it at that.

 

[raptor22]

Well Saudis have already destroyed Afghanistan,Syria,Libya & Yemen .. kidnapped Lebanon PM & had plan to occupy Qatar ... not mentioned they asked americans to cut head of snake ..
So I am not shocked to see them attacking another neighbor, israel & saudis are 2 sides of the same coin whom see their security in others insecurity ..

 

[sammuel]

kidnapped Lebanon PM.

Kidnapping is a serious offence

what about this ? :


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Rafic_Hariri

" The Special Tribunal, along with an independent investigation carried out by Lebanese brigadier general Wissam Al-Hassan, found compelling evidence for the responsibility of Lebanese group Hezbollah in the assassination "

`

 

[raptor22]

Kidnapping is a serious offence

what about this ? :


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Rafic_Hariri

" The Special Tribunal, along with an independent investigation carried out by Lebanese brigadier general Wissam Al-Hassan, found compelling evidence for the responsibility of Lebanese group Hezbollah in the assassination "

`

Evidence of Israeli involvement in the assassination

The special court to date has not paid attention to the full evidence provided about the assassination. The pictures, images, and news of the incident day suggest that the killing could not be conducted by a simple bomb blast. The electronic systems of the guarding team were the best in the world, designed by an American company and also used to guard the American leaders. The protection systems allow the team to deactivate any electronic devices that could be used to detonate an explosive remotely in a several-meter range. The systems are only ineffective if a missile from atop hits the motorcade. Furthermore, the hole created by the explosion supports the precision missile strike theory.

The similarity could be drawn between the Beirut blast and the blasts caused by the Israeli air raids during 2006 war and also wars against Gaza.

Recovering samples of uranium from the blast site strengthens the theory that the explosives used for the operation were not available to any militant group or a classic army like the Syrian army. Armies with the new technologies only can use the depleted uranium in the bombs. Such bombs were used by the US military in Iraq and the Israeli regime’s military in Gaza.

As mentioned above, the Hariri security team was using a guarding system produced by an American company. This means that only the company or experts familiar with its coding could remotely deactivate it. This was, the experts suggest, possible by an AWACS aircraft. Israeli AWACS planes was reported to have flown over Beirut coastal area in three days in a row, 13, 14, and 15 February, 2005 and were believed to be responsible for the remote deactivation of Hariri security system. The STL asked the US and Israeli air forces to hand over information recorded by their AWACS planes and satellites in the day of the explosion. But they both rejected to do so, ridiculously arguing that their spy satellites and AWACS systems faced technical problems at the time.

Recently, Lebanon’s Al-Akhbar newspaper gained documents showing that the prosecution team used the experience of the Israeli experts and American intelligence services to gather anti-Hezbollah data. The Al-Akhbar documents revealed names of three secret-identity experts: Rita Katz, Mathew Levitt, and Robert Bier. Katz is an Israeli national and served in the Israeli army in the past. Levitt is the director of the US Department of Treasury's special office to fight Hezbollah financing sources. He is the main source of the American intelligence’s analyses on the Lebanese group. And Bier is a retired agent of the US intelligence.

Washington and Tel Aviv have been following three major aims in the region: Syrian forces' withdrawal from Lebanon, regime change in Syria, and disarming Hezbollah. The first goal was realized by the Hariri assassination. For the second goal, they fueled the Syrian home conflict. And for the third one, they forced a UNSC resolution, known as Resolution 1701. Blaming Hezbollah in the Hariri case, Washington and Tel Aviv hope, can help pave the way for curbing the movement’s military power.​