Possibilty of Kashmir solution between Modi and Pak Army?

[janon]

You are correct, I got it backward. Hindu ruler of J&K at partition, majority Muslim population then. My error. Should have refreshed memory on the Internet as I admonish young folks to do on his site regularly!

Fact remains J&K are not resolvable in my opinion. A waste of time to do more than seek more open borders and collaborative free trade zones there.



Yes, I just corrected myself. My opinion remains, despite my lousy memory, that J&K are not material to positive needs of the world. It is a pointless argument based on raw, backward religious prejudices on both sides, no matter which side had the population majority. Just absolutely pointless and useless to building a better more progress world full to more free democratic nations.

This reddened part is all that I am objecting to. Like I said, the religious prejudice exists only on one side. For India, religion has nothing to do with our claim to Kashmir, and our willingness to defend our territory. It is what all sovereign nation states do.

 

[nForce]

Open the borders and the terrorists will roam free..

 

[INDIC]

Your recollection of history is flawed.

Example: The ruler at partition of India and Pakistan WAS a Muslim who chose affilation with Paksitan over India. The Muslim ruler of old Kashmir ruled over prior to 1947 partition a Hindu majority population.

But all this is a waste of words and time. Pointless.

The ruler of Kashmir was Maharaja Hari Singh who was a Hindu who signed accession with India after Pakistan invaded Kashmir in late October 1947, Also the most popular leader of Kashmir at that time Sheikh Abdullah was against Kashmir joining Pakistan as he didn't believe in religion based nation states.

@janon Pakistan invaded Kashmir on 22 October 1947 and ceasefire came into effect since 1 January 1949.

 

[acid rain]

You are correct, I got it backward. Hindu ruler of J&K at partition, majority Muslim population then. My error. Should have refreshed memory on the Internet as I admonish young folks to do on his site regularly!

Fact remains J&K are not resolvable in my opinion. A waste of time to do more than seek more open borders and collaborative free trade zones there.



Yes, I just corrected myself. My opinion remains, despite my lousy memory, that J&K are not material to positive needs of the world. It is a pointless argument based on raw, backward religious prejudices on both sides, no matter which side had the population majority. Just absolutely pointless and useless to building a better more progress world full to more free democratic nations.

Are you seriously suggesting open borders with Pakistan???

Do you have an idea of how many terrorists and terrorist organizations are there in Pakistan who presently cross completely militarized borders of Iran, Afghanistan(porous), India, China.

Pakistan is the headquarters of AQ, thousands of chechen, uzbek, arab , wahaabi, extremist sunni, shia terrorists live, train and transit through Pakistan. No wonder why our borders with Pakistan is one of the most militarized borders.

Someone must be stark raving mad to suggest having open borders with terror central.

 

[MilSpec]

Kashmir is a stale religious argument. It as an area is and has been since 1947 used by both Pakistan and India to distract the struggling for a better life masses from shortcomings that are holding the people back from sorely needed progress.

Hah, Who are the enablers? F16's anyone?

 

[k_arura]

Your recollection of history is flawed.

Example: The ruler at partition of India and Pakistan WAS a Muslim who chose affilation with Paksitan over India. The Muslim ruler of old Kashmir ruled over prior to 1947 partition a Hindu majority population.

But all this is a waste of words and time. Pointless.

You mean Hari Singh who signed instrument of accession was a Muslim?

 

[GreenFoe]

Your recollection of history is flawed.

Example: The ruler at partition of India and Pakistan WAS a Muslim who chose affilation with Paksitan over India. The Muslim ruler of old Kashmir ruled over prior to 1947 partition a Hindu majority population.

But all this is a waste of words and time. Pointless.

Who?

 

[Indrani]

The most simple solution we could hope for against use by both nations to bate the poor masses with shadow boxing issue of Kashmir would come from "open borders" for all parts of Kashmir, to include the third piece still held by Communist China

It is no surprise to see where MMS was getting his dumb ideas of open border from.

 

[Indrani]

Are you seriously suggesting open borders with Pakistan???

Do you have an idea of how many terrorists and terrorist organizations are there in Pakistan who presently cross completely militarized borders of Iran, Afghanistan(porous), India, China.

Pakistan is the headquarters of AQ, thousands of chechen, uzbek, arab , wahaabi, extremist sunni, shia terrorists live, train and transit through Pakistan. No wonder why our borders with Pakistan is one of the most militarized borders.

Someone must be stark raving mad to suggest having open borders with terror central.

The seculars will come with their standard reply oh but terrorists do not need passports. Did the Mumbai attackers come to India with a passport?

 

[halupridol]

The seculars will come with their standard reply oh but terrorists do not need passports. Did the Mumbai attackers come to India with a passport?

manavan,,,u r back

 

[harpoon]

Convert the LOC to IB...thats only the solution that will work in the immediate future.

The seculars will come with their standard reply oh but terrorists do not need passports. Did the Mumbai attackers come to India with a passport?

The recce for Mumbai attack was conducted by a terrorist with passport...David Headly.

 

[Indrani]

manavan,,,u r back

Wrong. Manvan will always be here, but I am not Manvan.

Convert the LOC to IB...thats only the solution that will work in the immediate future.




The recce for Mumbai attack was conducted by a terrorist with passport...David Headly.

I know. It is the seculars argument and not mine. They want complete open borders because a few terrorists manage to sneak in without passports.

 

[halupridol]

Wrong. Manvan will always be here, but I am not Manvan.



.

sorry bro,,,,took u for someone else

 

[lingalinga]

Wrong. Manvan will always be here, but I am not Manvan.

I know. It is the seculars argument and not mine. They want complete open borders because a few terrorists manage to sneak in without passports.

Your faith is touching .......

 

[halupridol]

Your faith is touching hermi .......

manavan,,,,,u r back(reprisal)
hermione u back too