Childish answers? PTI has been talking about dynastic politics, against nepotism, it has gathered a huge support by talking about these issues and now that PTI is walking the same path, it bothers her supporters who see this as hypocrisy. The relevance between Reham taking active part in PTI politics and decision about whether to vote anymore for PTI is more than obvious to me at-least and to those who are happening to post 'childish' replies here.
Doosron ko zaleel karey baghair bhi apni baat kahi jaa sakti hey.
Well i am sorry if you took it so personally, i never meant to hurt you or anyone else, sorry about that.
Baki brother the problem is that people tend to be quite hypocritical when it comes to supporting some political party and this trend started about 4 5 years back when PTI got into main stream. FOR EXAMPLE, when if comes to comparing the performance of PML they will compare it with that of PPP, which almost all of us agree was the worst it can ever be. However for PTI, they criticize any and every small step. I do feel that taking up comparative analysis for some issues and absolute perfection as criteria for the others is childish.
As for Reham taking part in active politics, what is the problem if she can get elected by voting? You CANNOT deny opportunity to two family members if they are equally capable, that will be unjustified. Also you can take a look at any political party across the world and you wont find examples where it is BANNED to have two people from one family elected. So as long as things are done on merit it do not see any problem in this. I never say that Nawaz and Shahbaz being from same family is nepotism on PML, it is not, they are BOTH capable and deserve to be in the party, to be the main stake holder of the party. My concern is about Abid Sher Ali or even maryam and hamza and the likes of them, do we need to debate on whether they was on merit? Or is there any need for the complete list including cousins and second cousins? So yes, i do think that the question that is addressing that only "If reham Khan enters politics" is childish, IF she is not capable and NOT elected and still IK tries to get her into politics, then that is bad. This is a big "IF", so yes, IF she is not elected, is not capable and still made the chairperson for some government youth program worth millions of rupee, i will strong condemn it and the value of Imran and PTI will decrease in my eyes (which sadly is already on a downward trend for some time but need things to get a whole lot worst to get in balance with the best in other parties)
Anyways, as it have been proved time and time again, this is a fruitless debate, PTI's entry into main stream politics have agitated the masses, people are more involved in the political issues then then the ever were. This is a great thing. However as any thing, this had both positive and negative impact, the negative being that the people have become a lot more volatile, the support for parties are so biased that we can easily change our evaluation methods, our rating systems, our definition of good and bad to suite our party. That is sad and is perhaps the biggest negative impact of PTI getting into main stream politics.
Given the similarity between various political parties in Pakistan, one should vote not for parties but better candidates. We need to let go party -based politics and enter into constituency -based politics.
I can vote you for this alone,,, I wish that day comes in our life when people start understanding this VERY basis idea of democracy!
I hoped PTI can work on these lines as it was new party and did not owned any one anything, unfortunately this have changed in past few years. Still, i do feel that relatively more new faces are given chance in PTI, there are more leaders from within the people only if one can look beyond Jhangir Tareen and Qureshi for sake of criticizing! STILL, THERE IS NOT DOUBT THAT THE EXTENT OF THAT GOOD WORK IS NOT NEAR TO WHAT I PERSONALLY EXPECTED FROM THEM.
Chanda! ye baat Imran Khan ko bhi samjhao Na ke, Agar Maryam Nawaz ye Bilawal Bhutto politics meyn hain toa koi maut toa nahi Aa gai ............
rather then making anyone else understand anything, can we just sit back and sincerely analyze our own choices. Just as an example, can you analyze that Bilawal Bhutto getting next is line is good for us? for Pakistan?
I mean isn't it the main reason for supporting or denouncing any political party? we all do this in interest of our country right?
I am not that petty and temperamental to decide my voting preference for my country on such matter .. reasons are many but I expect my readers to understand.
NO ONE SHOULD BE,, We are just forgetting why we support any particular party in the first place.
Dont know how can this be corrected, who will do it. I cannot figure out what part i personally can play and that drives me mad because this is something we need to address and correct on top priority. If we need to give democracy a chance, people will have to start to choosing wisely.
