And that was just one point that I mentioned....I also put the screenshot taken of the article...
Try not to read selectively but as a whole...
We'll realize soon who's rushing and who's actually understanding what's being written...
It's not a statement but part of the report.
Here's another screenshot of the article:
View attachment 797373
Which also mentions:
View attachment 797372
Section 295 of the Penal Code:
295: Injuring or defiling places of worship, with intent to insult the religion of any class
295A: Deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs.
Section 298:
298: Uttering of any word or making any sound or making any gesture or placing of any object in the sight with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of any person.
298A: Use of derogatory remarks etc., in respect of holy personages.
298B: (Ahmadi blasphemy law) Misuse of epithets, descriptions and titles etc., reserved for certain holy personages or places, by
Ahmadis.
298C: (Ahmadi blasphemy law) Aka
Ordinance XX: If a Muslim, or preaching or propagating his faith, or "in any manner whatsoever" outraging the religious feelings of Muslims, or posing himself as a Muslim.
Source:
en.wikipedia.org
View attachment 797378
Likewise.
lol....
Also, read my above post...#116....
It just clarifies everything basically.