Talking up sugar and shit, hey joe are you a rice convert?Fascinating.
So you think putting icing sugar on a pile of shit makes it instant temptation?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Talking up sugar and shit, hey joe are you a rice convert?Fascinating.
So you think putting icing sugar on a pile of shit makes it instant temptation?
Talking up sugar and shit, hey joe are you a rice convert?
Funny how Sanghis are desperately seeking legitimacy for their crimes from Muslims.
It will certainly give some more context where you are coming from.LOL.
Would you respect my posts more or less depending on whether I was one?
It will certainly give some more context where you are coming from.
Funny how Sanghis are desperately seeking legitimacy for their crimes from Muslims.
same as Pak. rules are for elite.. If judges can be intimidated, anything can happen. Or if judges follow popular opinion. One of our judge used to get happy on his news tickers, when he used to take suo moto notice.Business as usual. Mota Bhai is the Home Minister now; what's the law got to do with it?
The incident occurred in 1992...in Dec of this year it would be 28 years. If discretion is required that's fine...but to take this long that is indeed incompetence in delivering justice(whatever the circumstances e.g. transfers).No, it isn't. It's the individual judges deciding discretion is the better part of valour. It's judges deciding that they don't want to see cases foisted on them or transfers done, if they don't jump through hoops.
If they convert for a rice which is life sustaining commodity then all power to them - also shows they are smart. What does brahmanism give them - untouchability and humiliation.Talking up sugar and shit, hey joe are you a rice convert?
You've no idea what you are talking about.
Kashi- Vishwanath mandir converted into Gyanvapi mosque
Mathura- Mosque built on top of Krishna Janmbhoomi
same as Pak. rules are for elite.. If judges can be intimidated, anything can happen. Or if judges follow popular opinion. One of our judge used to get happy on his news tickers, when he used to take suo moto notice.
However being bias is totally different.
The incident occurred in 1992...in Dec of this year it would be 28 years. If discretion is required that's fine...but to take this long that is indeed incompetence in delivering justice(whatever the circumstances e.g. transfers).
Any sane judiciary wouldn't conflate two separate cases even if they are related.
Ram jamanbhi/Babri mosques land dispute case was going since 1950s onward, you should be thankful to Hindu patience who waited 70 long years for a judgement to arrive about space which means so much to them.
I fail to see why you are surprised.
I am curious to know, from whom would they seek legitimacy but the victims?
- They know they have behaved badly.
- They have been congratulating each other loudly, saying that they have not behaved badly.
- They know that it isn't enough for people caught in crime to reassure each other.
While you are at it, the second largest group to feature in their loud mutual reassurances is the non-denominational liberal. Does that make you think?
I'm not singling out judges and blaming them. My statement was more of a general statement.Discretion did not mean a wise and judicious application of the law; it meant an abstention from decision making. Not incompetence, but fear. It was not transfers alone; the Chief Justice was confronted with a transparently cooked up charge of sexual harrassment, and horrific consequences. One of the three-man Election Commission, who put in minority dissenting views on some very slanted decisions taken, had his son audited and investigated by the tax authorities, and charges were in the making that involved severe penalties. They would not have stuck, but, as in the case of Kafeel Khan, the process was the punishment.