What's new

PMLn insulting Pak Army

. .
patriot, kill her dam bitch prapogandas, will you?
She is BIG mouth. PMLn asking for trouble...ACM is veryyyyyyyyyy angry. Happy day for India. They been after Mushi for very long. Ganja made Indian happy.
 
Last edited:
. . . .
when it suited ganja he was the best lap dog of the establishment, operation night jackal etc etc, but now the ganja hates the guts of the same establishment who brought him in politics

if judiciary is unbiased why not proceed asghar khan case as well
 
.
PMLN beghairats should be careful. Raheel Shareef could well be second rebirth of Stalin.
RaheelSharif_380_AFP.jpg
upload_2014-3-31_22-57-18.jpeg
 
. .
GO **** YOURSELF!
@Aeronaut
Sorry but these people are crossing limits.....
PMLn & its aupporters are the ones most corupted & neckless peoples?
just imagine , NAWAZ SHARIF calling genral ZIA UL HAQ his father?
& now his dirty bitch bad mouthing his father, ancesstrl, organization?
limits just not crossed yet, its just the begaining stupid?
 
. .
Looks like Nawaz Sharif revisited his birth place "brothel" and recruited this masterne who does not know anything.
 
.
Drop your pants and turn around.
Stalin's achievements....

"he was not a great leader. I don't mean it in te 'good guy" sense but in the sense of things achieved. He got the
rule over the biggest country in the world handed to him on a plate (by Lenin) then he managed to run it for the duration of his lifetime- so he is about as "great" as a Mugabe (though Mugabe actually won his power- so he is "greater")

Achievements- the deliberate starvation of 5 milion Ukrainians, deportation of Crimean Tartars, wars waged against such "superpowers" like Finnland or Estonia. And in the case of Finnland - Stalin was so "great" a leader that the Finns almost won that war...
More achievements- he spent 50 times the money western states did- and achieved "industrialisation" of the soviet Union- at a level roughly 50 years behind the "west".
International "achievements"- best friend and ally of Adolf Hitler. While being the owner of the biggest spy network in the world he managed to get himself double-crossed by Adolf (who wasn't a genius either).

War leadership- Stalin had 5 times more troops and better tanks than Hitler- and still managed to lose the war. What saved him was the fat that Japan attacked the US and Hitler (in his typical genius move) declared war on the US- which meant that the US supplied the USSR with the tanks and fighter planes (roughly 1/3 of what the soviets used in WW2) needed to stop the nazis at the gates of Moscow.

Another "genius" tactic was the mass infantry attacks favoured by Stalin- how do you think the soviets managed to lose 20 milion soldiers in 3 years of war?

to sum up- he was a very bloody leader- but had not one atom of "greatness". About the level of a Nero"
 
.
Stalin's achievements....

"he was not a great leader. I don't mean it in te 'good guy" sense but in the sense of things achieved. He got the
rule over the biggest country in the world handed to him on a plate (by Lenin) then he managed to run it for the duration of his lifetime- so he is about as "great" as a Mugabe (though Mugabe actually won his power- so he is "greater")

Achievements- the deliberate starvation of 5 milion Ukrainians, deportation of Crimean Tartars, wars waged against such "superpowers" like Finnland or Estonia. And in the case of Finnland - Stalin was so "great" a leader that the Finns almost won that war...
More achievements- he spent 50 times the money western states did- and achieved "industrialisation" of the soviet Union- at a level roughly 50 years behind the "west".
International "achievements"- best friend and ally of Adolf Hitler. While being the owner of the biggest spy network in the world he managed to get himself double-crossed by Adolf (who wasn't a genius either).

War leadership- Stalin had 5 times more troops and better tanks than Hitler- and still managed to lose the war. What saved him was the fat that Japan attacked the US and Hitler (in his typical genius move) declared war on the US- which meant that the US supplied the USSR with the tanks and fighter planes (roughly 1/3 of what the soviets used in WW2) needed to stop the nazis at the gates of Moscow.

Another "genius" tactic was the mass infantry attacks favoured by Stalin- how do you think the soviets managed to lose 20 milion soldiers in 3 years of war?

to sum up- he was a very bloody leader- but had not one atom of "greatness". About the level of a Nero"

Stalin wasnt great leader at all. Men were cheaper in Soviet doctorine. Their amred forces motto is STILL the more the better. That's why they have armors 3 times more than US. It's a military doctorine that failed. The Nazis on the other hand spearheaded pronged attacks, the Blitzkriegs.

Stalin wasnt a great leader or military tactician infact he was a revolutionary with no military battlefield knowledge.

What yahuudi agent @Jaanbaz Al Oont Sheikh said was Gen Shreeef sab needs to go Stalin on the asses of the politicians.

You know we'd be better off man.

Stalin's achievements....

"he was not a great leader. I don't mean it in te 'good guy" sense but in the sense of things achieved. He got the
rule over the biggest country in the world handed to him on a plate (by Lenin) then he managed to run it for the duration of his lifetime- so he is about as "great" as a Mugabe (though Mugabe actually won his power- so he is "greater")

Achievements- the deliberate starvation of 5 milion Ukrainians, deportation of Crimean Tartars, wars waged against such "superpowers" like Finnland or Estonia. And in the case of Finnland - Stalin was so "great" a leader that the Finns almost won that war...
More achievements- he spent 50 times the money western states did- and achieved "industrialisation" of the soviet Union- at a level roughly 50 years behind the "west".
International "achievements"- best friend and ally of Adolf Hitler. While being the owner of the biggest spy network in the world he managed to get himself double-crossed by Adolf (who wasn't a genius either).

War leadership- Stalin had 5 times more troops and better tanks than Hitler- and still managed to lose the war. What saved him was the fat that Japan attacked the US and Hitler (in his typical genius move) declared war on the US- which meant that the US supplied the USSR with the tanks and fighter planes (roughly 1/3 of what the soviets used in WW2) needed to stop the nazis at the gates of Moscow.

Another "genius" tactic was the mass infantry attacks favoured by Stalin- how do you think the soviets managed to lose 20 milion soldiers in 3 years of war?

to sum up- he was a very bloody leader- but had not one atom of "greatness". About the level of a Nero"

Stalin wasnt great leader at all. Men were cheaper in Soviet doctorine. Their amred forces motto is STILL the more the better. That's why they have armors 3 times more than US. It's a military doctorine that failed. The Nazis on the other hand spearheaded pronged attacks, the Blitzkriegs.

Stalin wasnt a great leader or military tactician infact he was a revolutionary with no military battlefield knowledge.

What yahuudi agent @Jaanbaz Al Oont Sheikh said was Gen Shreeef sab needs to go Stalin on the asses of the politicians.

You know we'd be better off man.

SNIP
/quote]

Stalin wasnt great leader at all. Men were cheaper (conscripts with 8 hour bootcamp training) in Soviet doctorine. Their armed forces motto is STILL the more the better. That's why they have armors 3 times more than US even now! It's a military doctorine that failed. The Nazis on the other hand spearheaded pronged attacks, the Blitzkriegs.

Stalin wasnt a great leader or military tactician infact he was a revolutionary with no military battlefield knowledge.

What yahuudi agent @Jaanbaz Al Oont Sheikh said was Gen Shreeef sab needs to go Stalin on the asses of the politicians.

You know we'd be better off man.
 
Last edited:
. .
Back
Top Bottom