PML-N elects Nawaz as 'Quaid for life', Shahbaz as interim party president

[VCheng]

Munh tod jawaab by Sher-e-Pak to undemocratic elements.

Regards

The irony is surely lost on you here. How can a party with a "for-life" leader be a democratic party itself?

 

[Pakistani E]

Waseem Akhtar = Dhamal Chaudry ?

Khawaja Saad Rafique = Haidar Abbas Rizvi? No that just doesn't feel right. Haidar bhai is more eloquent than that paindu.

 

[Zibago]

Khawaja Saad Rafique = Haidar Abbas Rizvi? No that just doesn't feel right. Haidar bhai is more eloquent than that paindu.

Kon baney ga Abid Sher Ali aur Rana Sanaullah?

 

[Super Falcon]

Munh tod jawaab by Sher-e-Pak to undemocratic elements.
Regards

Carore di lanat nawaz pa aur uska haram khor supporters pa mulk dushmano se yahe umed ha agee aekho is bezat ka kesa mou kala hota ha

 

[Pakistani E]

Kon baney ga Abid Sher Ali aur Rana Sanaullah?

Abid sher ali = Mustafa kamal. Dono ki zaban milti julti hay.

Deewanay kiske...qaid ke...

Manzil nahi..rehname chaiyay...

Ham no hamaray baad...NAWAZ..NAWAZ..

 

[313ghazi]

No surprise there.

 

[gutto786]

Now PML (N) will need to have a Rabitta committee as well. Then when Nawaz sharif will be charged in march then they will need to have a Rabitta committee Pakistan and rabitta committee saudi arabia
Seen!

 

[Baghial]

abi tu raat key nien uttri.......................................................................................................................................................................

 

[YeBeWarned]

PML(N) and Pee Pee Pee should change their Moto to " Slaves and Proud " ..

 

[SoulSpokesman]

@Syed.Ali.Haider

Syed sb,

The irony is surely lost on you here. How can a party with a "for-life" leader be a democratic party itself?

No, sir, it is not lost on me. This is not an ideal state of affairs- unfortunately this (a party being the private property of an individual or a clan) is a norm for the whole subcontinent, not just Pak. With the exception of the greens, the saffrons and the reds.

But I suspect MNS wudnt have had himself crowned the quaid for life had it not been for an unwarranted interference by an external, undemocratic, unaccountable judiciary acting on the behalf of the Deep State. The judiciary has every right to disqualify MNS from holding a constitutional post, but disqualifying him from a post in a party which swears by him seems so wrong. In that sense, it is a good comeback by MNS.

Regards

 

[VCheng]

@Syed.Ali.Haider

Syed sb,

The irony is surely lost on you here. How can a party with a "for-life" leader be a democratic party itself?

No, sir, it is not lost on me. This is not an ideal state of affairs- unfortunately this (a party being the private property of an individual or a clan) is a norm for the whole subcontinent, not just Pak. With the exception of the greens, the saffrons and the reds.

But I suspect MNS wudnt have had himself crowned the quaid for life had it not been for an unwarranted interference by an external, undemocratic, unaccountable judiciary acting on the behalf of the Deep State. The judiciary has every right to disqualify MNS from holding a constitutional post, but disqualifying him from a post in a party which swears by him seems so wrong. In that sense, it is a good comeback by MNS.

Regards

As the famous song says:

"Clowns to the left of me,
Jokers to the right, here I am,
Stuck in the middle with you"

They are ALL criminals, and should be called out as such. Two wrongs do not make a right.

 

[Flash_Ninja]

unwarranted interference by an external, undemocratic, unaccountable judiciary acting on the behalf of the Deep State.

This ridiculous conspiracy is based on hearsay, not factual evidence.

, but disqualifying him from a post in a party which swears by him seems so wrong.

A political party should be able to function without their traditional leader, what you are describing is a cult, which has absolutely no place in politics.